At least Kamala Harris has stated she will not support Gina Haspel.
Good to see that Donnelly's facing pushback on his idiotic support for Haspel:
Joe announced today he will support Gina Haspel’s nomination to be @CIA Director. Read his statement:
- What is the point of a Dem Senator in IN if he just votes in lock step with repubs. I voted for you for better representation than the Rs. Not the same. But keep working for those Rs votes. They will vote you out just cause you have a D. Where I would vote for what you do.
- And literally no one primaried him. It's ridiculous. He's likely going to lose in Nov because he's a fence sitter who can't do what dem voters voted him in to do. Stand up to Republicans.
- Exactly. He will never get the Rs vote. With A D next to his name he might as well have aborted 1k babies in satanic ritual to honor our god Pelosi, as far as they are concerned. But he could have won the Dems. He could have shown us a chance for rep. in red state. He failed us.
- Vote an actual progressive then.
- If the Dems weren't so weak and lacked so much confidence in a liberal msg and actually chose to support and put one up for primary in a conservative state I would. 100% But Centrist Dems are afraid to be called socialists. They are terrified of being called tax and spend.
- Why do you think they DONT put progressives up in red states? because they'll get destroyed. Its not even up for debate. They would. Anyone saying otherwise doesn't understand politics, and losing on purpose just on principle is even worse.
- Here is the thing, when I say liberal I do not mean a Nancy Pelosi style Liberal. I mean the Dem base we used to have. Blue collar workers. Of any color. You can court liberal policies in conservative language in you believe the msg. You can support equal rights as a conservative
- Only the Rs convinced Dems they can't. Rs said you can't support gay rights in Red states. But a Dem can say I support everyone's constitutional rights. No one should be fired based on who they are. Don't even have to say gay. Buts dems have no spines to voice their msg to others
- 4 more replies
- Your statement should read: “I’m trying to save my job, therefore I’ll vote republican. I’m a DINO, who only cares about being in office.”
- Which is also why he won’t keep this seat come November.
- Your campaign has ONE path to re-election. Up the turnout (T.O) % of Dems & Dem leaners. Others have tried to pull GOP leaners by votes like this e.g. play acting as a GOPer it doesn't work even worse it pushes down Dem T.O.
- @JoeforIndiana lost every vote from my democratic household.
- IN is likely gone anyway but a Dem like Donnelly at least votes no on tax scam his tea party replacement? 100% yes all trump every vote.
- Nope. Lost my vote. I will never vote for someone who supports torture.
- Damn it, Joe!
- I wrote, now I’m calling, you should do the same. Anyone who refuses to say water boarding is torture should not be given this power.
Good for Tim Kaine for not supporting Haspel.
- Among the many casualties of the war on terror was the moral judgment of those in government complicit in the use of torture. Gina Haspel was one of them. Like @SenJohnMcCain, I am gravely concerned by her failure to condemn torture as immoral. I will be opposing her nomination.
The ACLU has a list of things that should trouble everyone about Gina Haspel. I'll note this:
Haspel wouldn’t say whether she wanted the torture program to continue
When Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) asked Haspel if she ever called for the CIA’s torture program “to be continued or expanded” between 2005 and 2007, Haspel didn’t answer directly, only saying that she and her colleagues “believed in our work” and that she didn’t want to be put “on the sidelines.” Haspel even said that the real “tragedy” was “that the controversy surrounding the interrogation program” had “cast a shadow over what has been a major contribution to protecting this country.”
Wyden was troubled by her response, responding, “I would really like to have on the record whether you called for the program to be continued, which it sure sounds to me like your answer suggested.”
There is reason to believe that there was an effort in the CIA to expand the torture program at that time, as evidenced by a 2005 proposal uncovered in the ACLU’s lawsuit against the psychologists who helped devise the torture program. If Haspel did in fact advocate for the torture program from 2005 to 2007, it would have followed the publication of shocking photos of brutal torture at the Abu Ghraib prison in 2004. In 2005, the Senate passed Sen. John McCain’s anti-torture amendment and in December of that year, President Bush signed the Detainee Treatment Act into law. Everyone in Congress believed the CIA torture program was over — and it would be deeply problematic if Haspel was trying to keep it going.
Gina Haspel belongs in prison, not in charge of any agency."Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
ATTENTION Iraqis living in the USA: If you OR your parents were born in Iraq, you are eligible to vote in the Iraqi elections TODAY. U.S. voting locations are posted. You must present proof of U.S. and Iraqi citizenship of yourself or your parents to vote.
Iraqi expats and their adult children can vote in the #IraqElection on May 10-11; two days before the general Iraq elections on May 12th. Pictures of Iraqi #Chaldeans and #Assyrians living in USA, Europe, and Australia voting today in the Iraq Elections. #IraqiChristians
Staying in the US for a moment more, Ro Khanna, he pretended to care about the Iraq War in his failed attempt to enter Congress in 2004. These days, he is a member of Congress and he still pretends to care about the Iraq War.
Every single Democrat in the House and Senate should pledge now to oppose any preemptive strike on Iran. Our base should demand this in 2018. We need to prevent another epic blunder like Iraq, which too many Democrats enabled. Let’s be a real opposition party on Iran — no war.
We need to prevent another epic blunder like Iraq?
Excuse me, when do we need to stop the epic blunder of the Iraq War?
April 24th, the Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson and Gen David Goldfein appeared before the Senate Armed Forces Committee and explained that the US Air Force, in 2017, conducted over "172,000 sorties and 98,000 precision air strikes -- over 70% of the total in the campaign -- to support Iraqi and partner forces in Syria and Iraq." And, no, Wilson and Goldfein did not announce an end to these actions. In fact, the bombing campaign will continue.
And does.
Between May 4 and May 10, #Coalition military forces conducted 53 strikes consisting of 63 engagements in #Iraq and #Syria.
tinyurl.com/y753lx2t
The fakery never ends. And some (non)action groups join in on the fakery.
Ah, the liberal Dem war opportunists have awoken! Send them money!
WalkOn.org -- they walked on away from Iraq after using the war as a moneymaker and pretending to be against it. As John Stauber pointed out at COUNTERPUNCH:
I have written previously about
how beginning in 2006 the Democrats progressive front group MoveOn, who
had the money and PR to position themselves as the leading antiwar
organization, worked with Nancy Pelosi to co-opt the movement into a
campaign vehicle for the party, making sure the war was funded all the
while Bush was in office, and using it like a gift to attack Republicans
in 06 and 08.
In the pathetic giddiness that
overtook progressives after Obama’s election, there was little notice
given to his announcement that there would be no investigation of how
America was led to and lied into war, that page would be turned and we
would move forward. After all, the war was a bipartisan venture, and
his soon to be cabinet members Vice President Biden, Secretary of State
Clinton, and future Secretary of State Kerry were all pro-war culprits.
In late 2011, Obama pulled a George Bush type PR stunt, and declared the Iraq war had ended, welcoming home the troops. That news story now reads like the front page of The Onion.
Once dubbed the 'Venice of the Middle East,' Iraq's Basra is now a showcase for the virtual absence of public services in a country plagued by turmoil, corruption and decay reut.rs/2G6eHe6
Ulf Laessing (REUTERS) reports:
Today the cherished canal of Mohamed’s youth is a reeking, refuse-filled cesspool forcing passersby to cover their mouths.
It is a showcase for the virtual
absence of public services in a country plagued by turmoil, corruption
and decay since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.
“Basra was once a wonderful
place,” said Mohamed, 52, who runs a grocery shop established by his
father in 1966 in a street full of traditional dwellings that are
falling apart.
“But we’ve had wars and neglect,”
he said, pointing to the illegible scrawl on a wooden post from the
1960s - the last time Iraqi authorities put up street signs in the city
of 2.5 million people, Iraq’s second largest, just upstream from the
Gulf.
Basrawis interviewed at random
said they would not vote in Saturday’s parliamentary election or, even
if they do, had lost faith that officials would restore their city to
its old glory.
May 12th, elections are supposed to take place in Iraq. Ali Jawad (ANADOLU AGENCY) notes, "A total of 24 million Iraqis are eligible to cast their ballots to elect members of parliament, who will in turn elect the Iraqi president and prime minister." RUDAW adds, "Around 7,000 candidates have registered to stand in the May 12 poll, with 329 parliamentary seats up for grabs." AFP explains that the nearly 7,000 candidates includes 2014 women. THE SIASAT DAILY adds, of the nearly 7,000 candidates, "According to the electoral commission, only 20 percent of the candidates are newcomers." Ali Abdul-Hassan and Sinan Salaheddin (AP) report, "Iraqi women account for 57 percent of Iraq’s population of over 37 million, according to the U.N. Development Program, and despite government efforts to address gender inequality, the situation for Iraqi women has declined steadily since 2003. According to the UNDP, one in every 10 Iraqi households is headed by a widow. In recent years, Iraqi women suffered further economic, social and political marginalization due to decades of wars, conflict, violence and sanctions." RUDAW also notes that 60 Christian candidates are competing for the five allotted minority seats. How do they elect the prime minister? This comes after the general election and is based on who won seats in the election. Abdulrahman al-Rashed (AL ARABIYA) explains, "To win the premiership, a candidate needs to win the majority of the votes, i.e. the votes of 165 MPs out of 329. Since it is a multi-party system, it is almost impossible to win these votes without sealing political alliances. The governorate of Baghdad is the most important one because it is the largest with 69 seats." The chief issues? Mustapha Karkouti (GULF NEWS) identifies them as follows, "Like in previous elections, the main concerns of ordinary Iraqis continue to be the lack of security and the rampant corruption." Sunday, RUDAW explained that the electoral commission "so far fined 210 candidates for violations of commission guidelines."
As noted in the April 3rd snapshot, pollster Dr. Munqith Dagher has utilized data on likely voters and predicts that Hayder al-Abadi's Al-Nasr will win 72 seats in the Parliament, al-Fath (the militias) will get 37 seats, Sa'eroon (Moqtada al-Sadr's new grouping) will get 27 seats, Nouri al-Maliki's State of Law will get 19 seats, al-Salam will get 18 seats (KDP and PUK parties for the Kurds), Ayad Allawi's Wataniya will get 15 seats. There are others but Dagher did not predict double digits for any of the other seats. The number are similar for the group of those who are extremely likely to vote (Hayder's seats would jump from 72 to 79 seats). Other predictions? The Middle East Insstitute's Fanar Haddad insists to Sammy Ketz (AFP) that the post of prime minister will come down to one of three people: Hayder al-Abadi (current prime minister), Nouri al-Maliki (two time prime minister and forever thug) or Hadi al-Ameria "a leader of Hashed al-Shaabi, a paramilitary network that played a pivotal role in defeating IS. Ameri comes from Diyala province and is a statistics graduate from Baghdad University. He fled to Iran in 1980 after Saddam executed top Shiite cleric Ayatollah Mohammed Baqr al-Sadr. The 64-year old is widely viewed as Tehran's favoured candidate."
ICYMI: Kurdish candidate in Iraqi elections survives assassination attempt in Khanaqin
kurdistan24.net/en/news/b7e144…
#TwitterKurds #Iraq #IraqiElections
More violence is expected. The US Embassy in Baghdad issued the following yesterday:
Security Alert – U. S. Embassy Baghdad, Iraq (May 10, 2018)
Location: Baghdad, Iraq
Event:
National elections will take place on Saturday, May 12. The U.S.
Mission has received information of possible terrorist attacks against
polling stations throughout Iraq, specifically in the Umm Al-Qura and
Ghazaliya neighborhoods of Baghdad. The Embassy has temporarily
curtailed movement of its personnel to these areas.
Actions to Take:
- Be aware of your surroundings.
- Enhance your personal security.
Assistance:
U.S. Embassy Baghdad
Al-Kindi Street, International Zone, Baghdad
Telephone: 0760-030-3000
Telephone: 301-985-8841, ext. 4293 or 2413 (U.S. numbers that ring in Baghdad)
U.S. Citizen Emergency After-Hours Telephone: 011-964-770-443-1286 or 011-964-770-030-4888 from the United States or 0770-443-1286 or 0770-030-4888 from within Iraq
E-mail: BaghdadACS@state.gov
Website: https://iq.usembassy.gov/
Al-Kindi Street, International Zone, Baghdad
Telephone: 0760-030-3000
Telephone: 301-985-8841, ext. 4293 or 2413 (U.S. numbers that ring in Baghdad)
U.S. Citizen Emergency After-Hours Telephone: 011-964-770-443-1286 or 011-964-770-030-4888 from the United States or 0770-443-1286 or 0770-030-4888 from within Iraq
E-mail: BaghdadACS@state.gov
Website: https://iq.usembassy.gov/
U.S. Consulate General Erbil
413 Ishtar, Ankawa Erbil, Iraq
Telephone during business hours from Iraq: 0760-030-3227; from the United States: 240-264-3467 and then extension 4554
U.S. Citizen Emergency After-Hours Telephone from Iraq: 0760-030-4909 and ask to speak with the duty officer; from the United States: 240-264-3467 and ask to speak with the duty officer
E-mail: ErbilACS@state.gov
Website: https://iq.usembassy.gov/embassy-consulates/erbil/
413 Ishtar, Ankawa Erbil, Iraq
Telephone during business hours from Iraq: 0760-030-3227; from the United States: 240-264-3467 and then extension 4554
U.S. Citizen Emergency After-Hours Telephone from Iraq: 0760-030-4909 and ask to speak with the duty officer; from the United States: 240-264-3467 and ask to speak with the duty officer
E-mail: ErbilACS@state.gov
Website: https://iq.usembassy.gov/embassy-consulates/erbil/
State Department – Consular Affairs
888-407-4747 or 202-501-4444
888-407-4747 or 202-501-4444
- Iraq Country Information
- Iraq Travel Advisory
- Enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP) to receive security updates.
- Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.
Those who venture out to vote on Saturday will be doing so with little information provided by their media. Mustafa Habib (NIQASH) reports:
Some outlets claim they are independent but once the political party funding started to come in, they quickly aligned with their backers.
Presenters and reporters were quick to publish embarrassing or scandalous videos of their funders’ opponents, or criticize the opposition parties, or come up with dated government documents that supposedly showed how corrupt every other politician was. When television reporters were sent out to interview locals on the street and solicit their opinions on what was wrong with local politics and what they wanted from their representatives, only the views that fit with the funders’ policies and platforms made it to air.
The broadcast partisanship came in many other forms too - and included tactics such as only inviting guests to talk shows who would criticise the channel’s opponents, ignoring the activities of the current government and only using statements from MPs who had oppositional opinions on important subjects such as rapprochement with the Gulf states, the US presence in Iraq and privatizing the electricity sector in Iraq.
All this meant that most local journalists were covering political conflicts, rather than dissecting the actual policies of parties, which have helped voters make an informed choice.
There were several topics that almost everyone covered. Logistical issues around the elections were a favourite subject and the preparations being made by Iraq’s Independent High Electoral Commission, or IHEC, which is tasked with overseeing the elections, were outlined in depth; this included security, organisation of polling and voter registration.
That sounds a great deal like the US media covering US elections, doesn't it? Well the US government and journalists did think they were skilled enough to teach Iraqis journalism. As though they were infants born into a world they couldn't understand without some patronizing American telling them what a free press was?
Mustafa Habib also reports:
It is just a few days before the Iraqi elections and there is a major campaign underway on Iraqi social media. But this is no election campaign. The most popular hashtags include ones that say things like: I’m not voting, boycott the elections, or stay at home. Hundreds of Iraqis changed their Facebook pictures to a logo that said, “I will not vote”.
Those who support the boycott had plenty of arguments to offer. They reminded voters about the lack of change after past elections and the laws that regulate how parties get into parliament that, boycotters say, unfairly exclude smaller parties and help to maintain the status quo.
The movement has been so noticeable that Iraqi politicians have been forced to respond. Senior Sunni Muslim politician, Salim al-Jibouri, said the elections presented a historic opportunity to put Iraq on another path after so many crises, and asked voters not to boycott the polls.
Former Iraqi prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, who heads one major Shiite Muslim group campaigning, said that the boycott campaign was the result of external interference and was meant to mislead the public. Another Shiite Muslim leader, Muqtada al-Sadr, said that if voters boycotted the elections they would be leaving the country to the corrupt.
Some of the activists behind the online campaigns did not see it that way. One popular blogger on social media wrote about his distrust of the authorities running the elections. “All I see is privileged politicians in a time of struggle. And this war on corruption appears to target only certain sectors of society,” he complained.
“I won’t vote because I won’t legitimize thieves and murderers,” another Facebook user added.
“We decided to boycott the election because we believe it is futile,” explained Safaa Subhi, the name used by one blogger on Facebook. “There is no real chance for change and we are trapped in a black hole that was dug by the political elites; they used their power to pass laws to ensure that the bigger parties remain in government and get to continue with their corrupt ways. They don’t even give the voters a chance to remove them from power.”
The following community sites -- plus Jody Watley and THE DIANE REHM SHOW -- updated:
