“Today, the Court, for the first time in its history, grants a business open to the public a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class,” Sotomayor wrote.
The associate justice harkened back to the civil rights and women’s rights movements in her dissent, suggesting that in recent years, gender and sexual orientation minority groups have faced “backlash to the movement for liberty and equality.”
“New forms of inclusion have been met with reactionary exclusion. This is heartbreaking. Sadly, it is also familiar,” she wrote. “When the civil rights and women’s rights movements sought equality in public life, some public establishments refused. Some even claimed, based on sincere religious beliefs, constitutional rights to discriminate. The brave Justices who once sat on this Court decisively rejected those claims.”
Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined Sotomayor’s dissenting argument.
Smith and her attorneys from the right-wing Christian group Alliance Defending Freedom identified a prospective client named Stewart who inquired about a website for his same-sex wedding, but a man claiming to be that individual came forward and claimed he is, in fact, a straight, married father who never made that request.
“I’m married, I have a child — I’m not really sure where that came from?" the man told the New Republic. "But somebody’s using false information in a Supreme Court filing document."
Legal experts were appalled that a ruling of such importance to LGBTQ rights could be based on such flimsy evidence.
"Please recall that no same-sex couple has ever sought to engage Lorie Smith's business to create a wedding for their website; this case is built entirely on hypotheticals; there are essentially no facts," tweeted Mark Joseph Stern, a legal writer for Slate. "The decision's scope is ambiguous and uncertain."
"It’s not clear what happened, and it’s not clear the claim makes a difference in the case — the issue wasn’t in the 10th Cir opinion and didn’t come up at oral arguments, in fact, a recurring point has been that there are no same-sex couples involved — but it’s certainly weird," added legal writer Chris Geidner.
"Just so you know, the Supreme Court just sanctioned discrimination against LGBTQ people based on a fake case," tweeted Imani Gandy, senior editor for law and policy for Rewire News. "Lorie Smith and ADF invented a gay couple to discriminate against and the Supreme Court said sure why not. On the last goddamn day of Pride."
"For Gorsuch to question the dissent’s handling of the facts in 303 Creative after his lies in Kennedy is nuclear hypocrisy," said Georgia State law professor Eric Segall. "'The dissent gets so turned around about the facts that it opens fire on its own position.'"
"The web designer in 303 Creative is an artisan doing work for hire," said Indiana University law professor Steve Sanders. "She is creating products ordered by customers, not selling her own artistic productions or following her own muse. All the Court's citations to the contrary are distinguishable. The 1st Am does not apply."
"Those of you writing up 303 Creative will want to be sure to note that the alleged request was made up," said legal writer Marcy Wheeler. "SCOTUS just ruled on something makebelieve."
"Let's be clear: nothing happened to the plaintiff in 303 Creative, the whole 'case' was a hypothetical exercise, and the GOP Justices used it as a vehicle to undermine every single federal, state, county, and city anti-discrimination law in the country," added trial lawyer Max Kennerly.
"This isn't a complicated first amendment case," tweeted Elie Mystal, justice correspondent for The Nation. "You can be as bigoted as you want to be on your own, hateful time. But when you put up a sign 'open for business' you have to SERVE THE CUSTOMERS who walk through your door. It isn't hard. Though I know bigots think it so."
Lastly, do not forget that Katie Halper has made the decision to glorify sex offenders. Today, she and professional cuck Aaron Mate brought pedophile Scott Ritter onto USEFUL IDIOTS to have fun and chat. He is a convicted pedophile. He is a registered sex offender. But he's also Katie's new buddy. She's pathetic and she's disgusting. May she rot in hell.
"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Rachel Looker (USA TODAY) reports on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s campaign:
In Norristown, Kennedy condemned the “toxic polarization that is really destroying our country.” Like his father in the 1960s, he lauds a similar crusade, but is instead campaigning on his belief that leaders in the Democratic Party today amplify division and push lies.
The junior Kennedy has his family's name but lacks his ancestors' popularity and is perceived differently in the public eye −in part for pushing anti-vaccine views that are at odds with what government agencies and prominent public health experts say. More diseases, like measles, can occur in communities with pockets of unvaccinated people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
This early surgical intervention is still happening to kids, hence the need for more education. While the documentary certainly covers this trauma, it offers hope through the eyes of activists.
Everyone's story is different. Some people's parents discover they are intersex when they're born but others do not know until puberty or beyond. Roth Weigel, for example, had internal testes and a vagina at birth. The protocol was to remove the testes – effectively castrating her.
Intersex people are often told to keep quiet about their identities which can make living their lives tricky, especially when it comes to dating and sex. It's ultimately up to individuals whether they want to come out and feel safe to do so.
Even among progressive circles the word "intersex" leave many scratching their heads. Cohen says: "I was a little floored by how many people just in the dinner party conversations that you have ... including people that are in the therapy world are like, 'Oh, yeah, intersex? What's that again? Is that like trans or kind of like trans?' Come on people. Get it together!" (Granted, LGBTQ+ terminology has only become very mainstream the last decade or so.)
"There's a huge lack of information," Wall adds, "and there is ignorance, and there's also willful ignorance."
While the community is fighting for legislative change to protect intersex kids, they're also figuring out what intersex culture really looks like.
"There's enough time where trans people have been in community where there's trans culture. You can talk in a similar language. Intersex people haven't been together and healed enough to be able to understand what it means to be in joyful community with each other," Gallo says.
According to Telemundo Puerto Rico, Ortiz was shot to death early Sunday morning on the highway behind a university in Carolina, just east of the capital city of San Juan, where seven to eight bullet casings were identified at the scene. Although media reports have misgendered and deadnamed her, Police Commissioner Antonio López Figueroa said the murder was being investigated as a transfemicide in a statement to Telemundo Puerto Rico.
“The agents are working on the investigation process that will lead to determining the true motive for death,” Figueroa told Telemundo. “As our duty dictates in all cases of violent deaths, we will not stop working until we clarify this death.”
It’s legislation that’s been closely watched by a self-described, life-long conservative Republican and his transgender son, who said it’s not external pressure, but an internal struggle.
“I did it because I knew it was the right, next-best thing in my life and I wouldn’t have done it if it wasn’t fully something that my heart and my mind and my spirit told me was the best thing for me,” said Ashton Colby. “So absolutely no pressure. And I’m so happy I did transition.”
“Transgender people, the folks that I’ve met, dear souls, young people trying to figure it out, you know, deep crisis,” said Rick Colby, Ashton’s father. “And a lot of times, it’s a spiritual crisis: ‘Who am I? Why am I here?’ And they’re trying to figure it out, and to see this assault wave of rhetoric against them…”
Rick Colby has been a loyal Republican since Ronald Reagan was in the White House, but he doesn’t recognize the party that’s expending so much time and energy opposing trans rights.
Despite DeSantis waging war on Disney however, the public appears to still have positive feelings toward the company.
In fact, nearly 50 percent of people surveyed in research for a Newsweek poll viewed Disney in a "favorable" or "very favorable" light.
In research conducted by Redfield and Wilton, 1,500 eligible U.S. voters were asked: "To what extent, if at all, do you have a favorable or unfavorable view of Disney?"
A total of 46 percent of those polled said they had positive feelings about the company, with 20 percent saying they had a "very favorable" view and 26 percent saying their view of Disney was "favorable."
That is in comparison to 13 percent who had an "unfavorable" view of the company.
The poll which was carried out on June 25, found 11 percent of people had a "very unfavorable" view of Disney while 24 percent were on the fence with neither a "favorable nor unfavorable" opinion.
A further six percent of the respondents said they did not know what view they held of Disney.
The poll of popular opinion is not the only battle Disney is winning against DeSantis, its social media has also had a boost over the past month.
Disney gained 44,742 new Twitter followers in the 30 days up to June 21, bringing its total to almost 10.3 million, according to the social media statistics website Social Blade.
It witnessed a further boost on Instagram, where Disney gained 278,550 followers in the same amount of time. Disney's official Instagram account now has 37,975,982 followers, making it the 199th most followed account on the social media platform.