Saturday, September 05, 2020

3 things -- Jessica Krug, Ed Snowden, UNITED WE FALL

 Starting with Jonathan Turley:

The case rekindles the tension in academic over claims of minority status, including the controversy surrounding the long-claims of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) who also taught at George Washington that she was a Native American. Much of our minority status designations are based on such self-identifications.  The Census Bureau approach is based solely on self identification. Since 2000, it has allowed people to check multiple boxes for races and ethnicities. Brown University attracted attention for proposing a pure self identification system for “people of color.”

Krug, 39, wrote a  Medium post titled “The Truth, and the Anti-Black Violence of My Lies.”  She revealed what she described as a life built on a “napalm toxic soil of lies.” That career include different claims of minority status from African to Caribbean to Puerto Rican roots as well as being raised in a poor family in the projects.  This background gave her greater credence in writing as a “historian of politics, ideas, and cultural practices in Africa and the African Diaspora.”


Okay, then.  What do you say to that?  I also wonder what "cancelling herself" means?  Is she resigning from her job?  She should have to.  She lied and got the job because she lied and her lie is outrageous and offensive and brings shame to George Washington University.

Raphael Satter (ICH):

Seven years after former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden blew the whistle on the mass surveillance of Americans’ telephone records, an appeals court has found the program was unlawful - and that the U.S. intelligence leaders who publicly defended it were not telling the truth.

In a ruling handed down on Wednesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said the warrantless telephone dragnet that secretly collected millions of Americans’ telephone records violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and may well have been unconstitutional.

Snowden, who fled to Russia in the aftermath of the 2013 disclosures and still faces U.S. espionage charges, said on Twitter that the ruling was a vindication of his decision to go public with evidence of the National Security Agency’s domestic eavesdropping operation.

“I never imagined that I would live to see our courts condemn the NSA’s activities as unlawful and in the same ruling credit me for exposing them,” Snowden said in a message posted to Twitter.

Evidence that the NSA was secretly building a vast database of U.S. telephone records - the who, the how, the when, and the where of millions of mobile calls - was the first and arguably the most explosive of the Snowden revelations published by the Guardian newspaper in 2013.

Up until that moment, top intelligence officials publicly insisted the NSA never knowingly collected information on Americans at all. After the program’s exposure, U.S. officials fell back on the argument that the spying had played a crucial role in fighting domestic extremism, citing in particular the case of four San Diego residents who were accused of providing aid to religious fanatics in Somalia.


Ed Snowden needs to be pardoned.  What he did was a public service and the truest example of civic duty in years.  He's a hero.

Ava and C.I. (THE THIRD ESTATE SUNDAY REVIEW) on the series UNITED WE FALL:

As a viewer, you relate to them and you root for them.  


As a Water Cooler Set member?


Of course not.  They don't like anything that's popular or geared for the mainstream.


They attack the series with all the built up rage they've been carrying around since 1982 when Ricardo Montalban showed up in a Farrah Fawcett wig to reprise his role of Khan in STAR TREK II: THE WRATH OF KHAN.


And Ricardo's an interesting reference point. Ricardo became a star in Mexico before traveling to the US and working for MGM where he made numerous films including three with Esther Williams (FIESTA, ON AN ISLAND WITH YOU and NEPTUNE'S DAUGHTER), LATIN LOVERS with Lana Turner and two films directed by William Wellman (BATTLEGROUND and ACROSS THE WIDE MISSOURI).  He starred for two years on Broadway with Lena Horne in the musical JAMAICA.   Later films include THE SINGING NUN, MADAM X (again with Lana Turner), SAYONARA (with Marlon Brando), SWEET CHARITY (with Shirley MacLaine), THE DESERTER (with John Huston), ESCAPE FROM THE PLANET OF THE APES, CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES, THE TRAIN ROBBERS (with Ann-Margaret), 


 He did numerous television programs -- including THE LORETTA YOUNG SHOW, HERE'S LUCY, GUNSMOKE, WONDER WOMAN, COLUMBO, MISSION IMPOSSIBLE, THE DEFENDERS, THE DORIS DAY SHOW, I SPY, THE DINAH SHORE CHEVY SHOW, THE WILD WILD WEST, THE MAN FROM UNCLE, DR. KILDARE, IT TAKES A THIEF, MURDER SHE WROTE, BEN CASEY and, of course, FANTASY ISLAND.  His other TV work included STAR TREK (1967's "Space Seed" episode) where he first played Khan. It also included the mini-series HOW THE WEST WAS WON for which Ricardo won an Emmy -- one of the few Latinos to win an Emmy.


Another who has?  Rita Moreno.


Rita Moreno is someone we've long applauded -- excepting only that hideous NETFLIX LAUGH-IN 'special' which was garbage and an embarrassment.  She is also a true EGOT.  An "EGOT" -- for anyone who doesn't know -- is someone who has won an Emmy, a Grammy, an Oscar and a Tony.  It's a small and select group.


Barbra Streisand has long promoted herself as someone in that group.  Hmm.  She's not a true EGOT because that Tony isn't for a performance.  It was a one-time award that they gave to her in 1970 after she'd moved on to film, "Star of the Year" -- or, as it was really known, "Come Back To Broadway, Barbra Joan, Barbra Joan."  She never did.  She didn't win a Tony in a competitive race (she was nominated twice -- for I CAN GET IT FOR YOU WHOLESALE and FUNNY GIRL -- and lost both times).  So she's not a true EGOT.


Rita won in competitive races.  There are no 'honorary' or one-time awards.


Rita's a one-of-a-kind superstar.  And she was in the news recently with Michael Schneider (VARIETY) reporting:


The new “One Day at a Time” has been virtually ignored by Emmy voters, save an annual nomination in the multi-camera picture editing for a comedy series category (where the competition is limited anyway, since there aren’t many multi-cam shows out there). The Television Academy Honors at least smartly recognized the show in 2018 with its “television with a conscience” award. Critics have bestowed much love on the series, and fan support kept the show alive when Netflix canceled it, spurring a move to Pop TV.

“One Day at a Time” boasts a predominantly Latinx cast, and sadly such shows still aren’t getting their due at the Emmys. In a year where African American performers and shows with Black leads saw a boost in representation at the Emmy nominations, there wasn’t room for similar strides among Latinx, Asian American and other groups. Such an omission is a bit mystifying, particularly as the Imagen Awards — which also just announced their nominations — demonstrated there’s no shortage of Latinx contenders.

In comedy, this year that included “One Day at a Time,” “Vida,” “Gentefied” and “Little America,” and stars such as Justina Machado (“One Day”), Mishel Prada (“Vida”) and, yes, Moreno. According to Imagen, this year’s awards submissions increased by 55% from 2019.


Before anyone e-mails, we quoted Schneider; ourselves, we don't use the term "Latinx."  It seems imposed, not arising from a community. 


But Rita's not nominated and Justina's not nominated and Mishel's not nominated . . . 


Where's The Water Cooler Set?


Oh, that's right, ripping apart UNITED WE FALL.

That article needs to be passed around.  Only nine Latinos have won prime time Emmys for performance -- acting in a show or doing a variety or comedy special.  That is appalling -- as is so-called critics attacking shows with Latino casts.  I did stream UNITED WE FALL.  I thought I'd watch one episode but I ended up watching six.  It's a very funny show.  



"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

 Friday, September 4, 2020.  The UN announces a public dialogue with Iraq over the issue of the disappeared and we look at the candidates for US president.


Sunday was the International Day of Victims of Enforced Disappearances (see "The number of the disappeared only increases").  The disappeared are victims around the globe.  People disappear, they are disappeared, and who stands up for them, who calls for their release and return (if they're still alive)?  The US-led war and ongoing occupation of Iraq continues and it has created and aided in the numbers of the disappeared.  In fact, it's helped turn Iraq into a land of widows and orphans.    The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights issued the following yesterday:  


Enforced disappearances: UN Committee to hold special online dialogue with Iraq
GENEVA (3 September 2020) - The UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED) will hold a special public dialogue with Iraq during its upcoming online session to discuss what the country is doing to address the issue of enforced disappearances. 

Iraq ratified the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance in 2010. Its initial report was examined by the Committee in 2015. The dialogue, due to be held on 14 and 15 September at 3:30 pm Geneva time, will focus on selected issues related to the measures adopted by the State to implement its obligations under the Convention. This will include the evolution of State’s strategies to prevent enforced disappearances, and to search for disappeared persons and investigate alleged enforced disappearances.

The overall CED session begins on 7 September at 4pm Geneva time, with a victim from Gambia addressing the opening. The session will last for three weeks until 25 September.

Among its activities, the Committee will also co-host a public webinar with the Working Group on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances on the search and investigation of enforced disappearances. The year 2020 marks the 40th anniversary of the Working Group, and the 10th anniversary of the entry into force of the Convention. The Committee and the Working Group will work together to strengthen advocacy and to support all those who are seeking the truth about the fate and whereabouts of disappeared persons.

The meeting schedule and details of the session, including information submitted by Iraq, are now available online. The public meetings will be webcast at this link. For media accreditation.

ENDS

For media inquiries, please contact Vivian Kwok at +41 (0) 22 917 9362 / vkwok@ohchr.org or the UN Human Rights Office Media Section at +41 (0) 22 928 9855 / media@ohchr.org 

Background

The Committee on Enforced Disappearances monitors States parties’ adherence to the Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance. The Committee is made up of 10 members who are independent human rights experts drawn from around the world, who serve in their personal capacity and not as representatives of States parties. The Committee’s concluding observations are an independent assessment of States’ compliance with their human rights obligations under the treaty. 

Learn more with our animations on the Treaty Body system and on the Committee on Enforced Disappearances!

Follow the UN human rights office on social media! We are on Twitter @UNHumanRights, Facebook @unitednationshumanrights and Instagram @unitednationshumanrights


As we have noted this week, Sunday's day of the disappeared was ignored by US outlets, completely ignored.  Will the session be covered?  Or do the privileged in the US just feel that the disappeared should remain disappeared and ignored?

Iraq is supposed to hold elections next June.  These early elections have been announced and they are in response to the non-responsive government that fails to meet the needs of the Iraqi people.  This failure has been true of every administration since 2003.  Each administration has vowed to rid Iraq of corruption and to improve the lives of the average Iraqi.  Each administration has, thus far failed.  Some really didn't try.  Graft and corruption was so 'normal' under the two terms of thug Nouri al-Maliki (installed in 2006 by Bully Boy Bush based upon the CIA assessment that Nouri's paranoia was so great he would be easy to control and then re-installed by Barack Obama and Joe Biden in late 2010 after the Iraqi people voted him out of office in the March 2010 elections), it was so normal under Nouri that even the lazy and do-nothing US Congress had to hold hearings on the corruption. 

They didn't do anything other than hold hearings.  

Nouri got rich, his idiot son got rich, his whole family got rich.

The Iraqi people?

They lost out.  They lost basic needs, the items available through their ration cards were greatly reduced, the employment sector didn't really exist, basic needs like potable water and electricity were iffy throughout Iraq.

May 7th, Iraq's latest prime minister was installed, Mustafa al-Kadhimi.  Weeks later, GREAT GAME INDIA noted:

Former Iraqi intelligence chief Mustafa al-Kadhimi was installed as the prime minister of Iraq as a result of a secret US Iran deal. The deal was that Iranians would back Kadhimi and in return US would unfreeze Iran’s assets targeted by US sanctions. Kadhimi has a history of working as an agent of the US intelligence services who provided false reports about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. The US’s withdrawal of Patriot missiles from Saudi Arabia last week was also part of the secret US Iran deal.

As per the deal, the US will not change its policy of exerting “maximum pressure” on Iran but agreed to de-escalate militarily in the Gulf. Americans also agreed to look the other way if any European country would release Iranian money frozen by US sanctions. The details of the deal were revealed by senior Iraqi political sources to Middle East Eye.


Ahead of planned elections, questions are being asked. Omar al-Nidawi (MIDDLE EAST MONITOR ONLINE) reports:

 

On 4 August, Iraqi activist Ridha Al-Igaili’s home in Amara, the capital of Maysan province, was attacked by militiamen who fired a rocket-propelled grenade and sprayed the building with bullets. This was the second attempt on his life this year. Luckily for Al-Igaili, a pharmacology student and member of the Maysan Students’ Union, no one was injured. News of the attack reverberated quickly on social media. Barely two weeks later, fellow activists Reham Yacoub and Tahseen Osama were assassinated.

These cold-blooded attacks were the latest in a wave of targeted violence and kidnappings by shadowy gunmen seeking to silence advocates of free speech and those speaking against Iraq’s corrupt, militia-dominated system of ethno-sectarian power sharing. They dampen any optimism for reform resulting from Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi’s announcement of early elections next June.

I have spoken recently with Iraqi activists who have been part of the pro-reform protest movement in Iraq since last October about their views on the election. Uniformly, these courageous young protesters were less concerned with the election date and much more interested in the conditions under which candidates and voters would campaign and go to the polls.

Their concern is justifiable. Within the first four months of the protests, government forces and gunmen believed to be affiliated with party militias killed at least 600 protesters, injured thousands and subjected scores to forced disappearances and torture. To outsiders, these are grim statistics, but to many Iraqi protesters, the victims of government violence such as Safaa Al-Sarray, or Hussein Adil and Sara, are friends-turned-martyrs. The memory of these icons of the “October revolution” inspires Iraq’s young protesters to keep struggling, peacefully, for reforms, and fair elections are their gateway.

Holding elections next June before the term of the current parliament expires will be a challenge. The government needs to address the conditions set by Iraq’s electoral commission (IHEC); finalise annexes to the new election law to define the contested borders and number of electoral districts; find $300 million from the country’s depleted purse to organise the polls; and take legislative action to rectify the legal status of Iraq’s top court (in questionable condition following an arguably illegal 2019 appointment of a court member) so that it can ratify the results. An even harder challenge will be to persuade sitting MPs to dissolve Parliament before June 2021 and forego months’ worth of pay, perks and power. Even if Kadhimi overcomes these obstacles, it will be even harder to create conditions for genuinely free and fair elections for all Iraqis.


Elections are scheduled for November in the US.  The GOP candidate will be incumbent President Donald Trump.  Many are hoping to defeat him.  The Democrats are offering up Joe Biden   Joe turns 78 in November.  His task is to attempt to convince American voters that he can process and that his senility has not progressed as far as it has.  Hidin' With Biden is the campaign strategy.  They broke it to have him meet with the family of a victim of police violence.  The victim doesn't have to defend himself in terms of the violence.  If he was attacked unfairly, there's no excuse for that.  However, it's also true that he has charges against him for assaulting a woman.

Not really sure that's the photo-op for Joe who has groped and sniffed women, creeped everyone out, and who has credible charges of assault made against him by Tara Reade.

There are plenty of victims of police violence who aren't facing trial for rape.  It's a shame Joe refused to meet with the families of any of those victims.

Just as there are many, many victims of police violence not accused of rape, there are candidates for president in this race not accused of rape.  Gloria La Riva, for example.  She is the nominee from the Party for Socialism and Liberation.  


Gloria is, of course, bilingual.  So she wouldn't need an interpreter when meeting with foreign leaders who spoke Spanish.  Nor does she need a written script of an encounter before she can appear before the cameras -- as so many have accused Joe Biden of needing.

Her campaign issued the following statement:

Three massive wildfires are currently raging in northern California surrounding the densely populated San Francisco Bay Area on all sides with a total of 700 fires burning throughout the state. Two of these Bay Area megafires are the second and third largest in California history. The largest in history occurred just 2 years ago north of the Bay Area in Mendocino County. Every year, wildfires are becoming more frequent, larger and more destructive, yet the state has done little to prepare and protect the population in advance. 

The current fires were sparked by over 11,000 dry lightning strikes within 72 hours that were  triggered by a tropical cyclone off the coast colliding with onshore extreme temperatures from an extended statewide heatwave. This rare weather anomaly created an unstable atmosphere and the barrage of lightning during a drought year when vegetation was prime to ignite. 

Cal Fire crews were sorely stretched thin for the first week of the fires. This is partly due to the immense number of fires occurring within a few days — 367 fires were sparked just from the storm — in addition to lack of support from fire crews from other western states due to fires throughout the region. Cal Fire annually relies on hundreds of inmates to supplement firefighting efforts, but many of these inmates have received early release due to COVID-19 risks in prisons and are now unavailable to assist. This points to a cruel contradiction within the system. While these formerly incarcerated men and women have extensive training and experience in fighting California wildfires, and are desperately needed, they are unable to get jobs on fire crews post-release due to their record of felony convictions. 

Cal Fire in recent years has increased efforts to clear vegetation in advance of fire season, but with climate change, aging electrical infrastructure and extreme weather events like the one that caused the current fires, those efforts fall short. Until the 1800s when colonizers banned the practice, the indigenous people of California annually held controlled burns to clear vegetation and reduce the spread of wildfires. Controlled burns are now again being utilized by the state, but in order to expand and improve these efforts, partnerships with California tribes could increase the number of annual controlled burns and bridge indigenous knowledge with fire science. 

As of Aug. 25, 136,000 people had been evacuated and over 800,000 acres have burned in the three largest Bay Area fires — that’s an area twice the size of Los Angeles. Evacuation centers are distancing people but there is still a high risk of COVID spread by being indoors with others for an extended period of time. Some are seeking refuge in discounted hotels rooms to avoid possible COVID exposure, but many cannot afford this option, demonstrating the class divide surrounding climate change impacts.

As the climate crisis unfolds, it is imperative to address land use policies. More and more areas on the edge of fire-prone forested areas are being developed for housing, putting populations at great risk. Developers are only concerned with profits and the state has done nothing to address land use despite the evidence that wildfires are becoming more severe, causing more loss of life and driving many into complete destitution when they lose their homes. 

Immigrant farmworkers throughout the state are being forced to work through, not only extreme temperatures, but also in wildfire smoke. Despite air quality regulators urging everyone to stay indoors to protect themselves from smoke, these super exploited workers face eviction and starvation if they don’t go to work. 

Under a socialist program, the priority of the government would be to mitigate the effects of climate change and do everything possible to prepare for catastrophe, protect all sectors of the population from smoke and fire, and rehouse all those who lose their homes. 

The La Riva/Freeman campaign demands:

  • Funds for expanded wildfire prevention efforts
  • Partner with California tribes on controlled burns
  • Increase the number of permanent CAL FIRE crews and allow formerly-incarcerated fire crews to be employed
  • Provide free hotel rooms for evacuees during the pandemic so families can safety distance
  • Real relief for residents who lose homes and can’t afford to rebuild — seize vacant units and investor-owned properties and house the houseless!
  • Reform land use policy — relocate people from high-risk areas and end wildland development
  • Make Big Tech pay! Tax the corporations to pay for climate change mitigation and wildfire prevention!



Last month, Gloria Tweeted:

I saw the genocide committed against the Iraqi people, due to George H. W. Bush's bombing war in 1991, Bill Clinton's sanctions that killed over a million Iraqi people and Madeleine Albright's despicable claim that it was worth those 500,000 dead children by total blockade.


Joseph Kishore is running on the Socialist Equality Party's ticket.  He Tweeted:

They are "extremely fearful of any criticism from the left, under conditions where the Biden-Harris campaign is openly appealing for right-wing support... and seeking to compete with Trump in law-and-order denunciations of protests against police violence."


And:


"The Russians are stoking divisions in the US" line by the Democratic Party is the most obvious intelligence misinformation operation since "Weapons of Mass Destruction."


Jo Jorgensen is the Libertarian Party's candidate.  Like Joe and Gloria, Jo is not accused of rape.  Her campaign's most recent press release is this:


GREENVILLE, S.C.— Libertarian vice-presidential hopeful Jeremy “Spike” Cohen will visit the east bay on Thursday, to share the Jorgensen–Cohen ticket’s plan to protect civil liberties by reducing the size and scope of the federal government. This includes ending both the racist war on drugs and qualified immunity for police officers.

Their platform also calls for bringing U.S. troops home from overseas, creating a truly free market in health care, and removing governmental barriers to competition in the energy industry, allowing for innovation in clean energy solutions, such as nuclear.

“Having challenged injustice, corruption, and prejudice in our government institutions, I’m excited about our 2020 ticket,” said Nickolas Wildstar, a 2018 Libertarian Party (LP) candidate for governor who plans to run again, should the ongoing petitioning effort to recall Gov. Gavin Newsom succeed. “Mr. Cohen ignites the American spirit of revolt against tyrannical leaders, and Dr. Jorgensen has the experience and principles to guide our nation to become greater—freer—than ever.” Wildstar added that together, the pair offers real solutions to racially biased policies, economic instability, and imperialism.

Wildstar will join Cohen, along with James Just, the Libertarian candidate for State Assembly (Dist. 7), as featured speakers at the campaign rally, which will kick off at 5:30 P.M. at Empowerment Park. LP Alameda Secretary Terry Floyd will emcee.

The Jorgensen–Cohen ticket is on track to appear on the ballots of all 50 states plus D.C.

Cohen’s events will feature selected officials and down-ticket candidates, include media availability, and are scheduled as follows (subject to change; times shown in local time zone):

Thursday, September 3
12 – 3 P.M.: Supporter luncheon (private ticketed event); Castro Valley 
3 – 4:15 P.M.: Media availability (by appointment) 
4:30 – 8 P.M.: Campaign rally at Empowerment Park, 462 Bellevue Ave., Oakland

For a full list of the candidates’ upcoming campaign events, visit Jo20.com/events.

Media advisory: Rain or shine! The candidate will have media availability at most tour stops. A mult box will be available at the rallies, although no risers. Personal distancing protocols will be followed; hand sanitizer and masks will be provided.  

For questions or to schedule interviews during these campaign stops, contact: 

  • Thurs., Sept. 3: Elizabeth Stump, Jorgensen–Cohen 2020 media coordinator, via e-mail at CA@Jo20.com, or by phone at (510) 828-2281


And here is her campaign's most recent ad.




Howie Hawkins is also not accused of rape and he's also running for president.  Howie's the nominee from the Green Party.



His campaign issued the following yesterday:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 3, 2020

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Kevin Zeese, KZeese@HowieHawkins.us   301-996-6582

Robert Smith, Robert@HowieHawkins.us   304-707-2824

 

Howie Hawkins Files Suit Against Election Commission In Wisconsin Supreme Court For Ballot Access

 

Today, the Green Party campaign of Howie Hawkins and Angela Walker filed suit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission in the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The suit filed by the Milwaukee law firm of von Briesen & Roper, s.c., asks the court to place Hawkins and Walker on the ballot for the November 3, 2020 general election.

Howie Hawkins said, “Thousands of voters in Wisconsin signed petitions to put the Green Party on the ballot. These voters want more choices than the Democratic and Republican Party. Our campaign stands with the majority of voters and calls for Medicare for all, a Green New Deal, taxes on the wealthy and an end to ongoing wars, and neither President Trump or former Vice President Biden supports those issues.”

Two thousand signatures are required to place candidates on the ballot. The Commission agreed that Hawkins/Walker submitted 1,789 valid signatures. In dispute were 1,834 more signatures where the staff of the Commission certified that they were qualified Wisconsin voters. The Commission voted 3-3 failing to sustain a challenge to the validity of those signatures. Under the law, those signatures should be presumed valid because the complaint filed by Allen Arnstein did not provide clear and convincing evidence that the petitions were invalid.

The issue in the case is around the address of Angela Walker, who said, “Throughout this process I lived in Florence, SC. My address in Florence changed, and the Commission has my current address.” The Hawkins/Walker campaign contacted the Commission for advice on how to proceed regarding Walker’s address and followed the Commission’s advice, submitting a statement of candidacy with the signatures with her current address.

“We hope the court will uphold the right of voters to vote for the Green Party since we submitted far more than enough valid signatures,” Hawkins said.

The suit asks for expedited action because the deadline for finalizing the ballot is rapidly approaching.

See Documents:


Howie, Jo, Joseph and Gloria, four candidates for US president and four who have not been accused of rape.



The following sites updated:

Thursday, September 03, 2020

Jonathan Turley covers criminal Pelosi

 Jonathan Turley:

Thirty years after the late D.C. Mayor Marion Barry’s famous statement, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared that a Salon owner set her up in an embarrassing incident where Pelosi was shown not just violating San Francisco’s pandemic laws in getting her hair done but not wearing a mask while doing it. Pelosi refused to take responsibility for the violation (including the failure to wear a mask) and, in the tape below, only took responsibility to “failing for a set up.” She added “I think that this salon owes me an apology, for setting me up.” The Salon owner, Erica Kious, has stated that she expects to close eSalon after receiving a torrent of death threats and hostile massages after Pelosi’s allegation. The question is whether she could actually sue for defamation.

Speaker Pelosi has previously used the eSalon, according to Kious, and was shown below on Monday getting her hair down despite a ban on salons for such appointments.

While not addressing her failure to wear a mask, Pelosi publicly attacked the Salon.

Read his whole column.

Funny, isn't it?  How Nancy and her goons thought they could lawyer up her stylist and we'd all believe him?

Why would believe him?

We already know Nancy's lying.  She's lying when she pretends that being caught on tape breaking the law is her being set-u.  No, you were caught on tape breaking the law.

A stupid whore named Carla Marinucci -- she's so ugly and the mustache hairs, ew!!!! -- works for POLITICO and wants to ask -- muddy the water -- if it was illegal to tape Nancy due to wire tapping laws.


This wasn't a wire tap.  Pelosi was recorded via the business' security camera system.

You know, the same footgate you see on your local news when some local business gets ripped off.

There is no law against that and, more to the point, Carla, a business is not a private area.  

Carla, go wax that ugly mustache.  

"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

 Thursday, September 3, 2020.  Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi lands in hot water, France's president pushes nuclear facilities in Iraq, and much more.


So we're going to have to talk the hair cut.  We avoided it here.  I didn't avoid it offline, we're all laughing at how cheap Nancy Pelosi is.  In the neighborhood, she has a reputation for watering down the drinks at her own gatherings -- not because she's afraid someone will be drunk and impaired on the road home but because she's so damn cheap.

Until she opened her mouth yesterday, that's all it was.  A laugh among those of us who know Nancy about how cheap she is.  Her whole episode could have been avoided if she'd offered to pay a little bit of money and the hairdresser would have come to her.  I don't go to some shop the day of an awards ceremony and get my hair done.  I pay the money and they come to me.  I keep waiting for Jon Peters to do a guest column on this for THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER -- about how even in the 70s, during the non-pandemic -- hairdressers would go to client's home for an additional fee.  

How cheap is Nancy?  The joke currently is that she's so cheap she's planning on being buried with her penny jar.  

And none of this would be mentioned here but she had to open her mouth and make it worse.

If you're late to the story, see:


  • And a quick recap, Nancy can't deliver a needed stimulus package -- one that should have been in place before August 1st when benefits were slashed -- but she can make time for a hair cut.  

    Again, she could have avoided this if she didn't, as one friend put it, use SuperCuts.  She went in to a salon that was closed.  She went inside despite the fact that our mayor has said no to that.  She could have visited and had her hair done on the outside.  But she wanted to be inside, violation number one.  Violation number two, she's not wearing a mask.

    Had that been it, we wouldn't be talking about it today.  I would have worn a mask -- diabetes, back on chemo, and other factors make me a risk.  But if she's not going to wear one, that's on her.  

    What made it pertinent for us?  What makes it pertinent for a site that covers Iraq?

    She has said that she didn't know the law.  Any judge would reply, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse."  She has said she was set up?  How?  She got caught.  No one forced her to do what she did.  She made the decisions to do what she did and she's responsible for her actions.  Only she refuses to take responsibility or accountability.

    Via CNN, here's her offending and laughable statement:

    I take responsibility for trusting the word of a neighborhood salon I've been to over the years many times, and when they said we're able to accommodate people, one person at a time, and that we can set up that time, I trusted that. As it turns out, it was a setup. So I take responsibility for falling for a setup.


    No, she does not take responsibility.  As many have already noted (many in the area), we all know what the rules are regarding haircuts.  This is not new, this did not pop up last week.  

    Nancy is in the wrong and she has no excuse.  I honestly thought that when she spoke on the manner, she'd say, "I made a mistake and I'm sorry about that.  I've certainly learned from this humiliating moment and it's might hope that others will be able to learn from it much easier than I have."

    I would've accepted that statement.  I wouldn't have applauded it because it doesn't merit applause -- it's the least, the very least, we should expect from a public servant.

    Instead, she wants to lie.  "I take responsibility."  But she doesn't.  According to her, her actions are not her fault.  According to her, they're the fault of someone else.  It's their fault because she "trusted" them.  And her talk of taking responsibility is hollow and a sham: "I take responsibility for falling for a setup."

    This is where we are now.  Adults think they are not responsible for their own actions and that they can blame others for what they do wrong.

    If you're not getting it, we've heard that garbage from one politician after another who voted for the Iraq War.  As is well established here, I do not like John Edwards (grabby hands).  But when John Edwards took responsibility for his vote, he did take responsibility.  (Elizabeth tried to muddy the waters for him but he took responsibility.)  

    The others?

    No.

    Joe Biden, 18 years after his vote for the war, still can't take responsibility.

    It's not his fault, he insists, the mistake he made was taking Bully Boy Bush's word.  

    No, that was foolish.  The mistake you made was voting for the Iraq War to begin with.  Saddam didn't have to disarm because he had no WMD.  

    We have let Joe and so many others get away with that.  We've looked the other way and pretended that it was okay for them to blame others for their own actions.

    It started with an indefensible vote and now it's made its way down to a hair cut.

    These things do not happen in isolation.

    Nancy will not take responsibility for her actions.

    She had attacked others for not wearing a mask.  She is a hypocrite.  She is also an adult -- and then some, she's 80-years-old.  And yet she refuses to take accountability.

    We all make mistakes -- every one of us.  That certainly includes me.

    If I know I've made mistakes (I probably make many that aren't even brought to my attention), I'll say so.  I'll say so and I'll take accountability and I'll move on.

    The alternative is too time consuming.  The nonsense of denying over and over and looking an idiot and liar is too time consuming.

    Admit your mistake, try the best you can to learn from it, and get the focus back on what matters.

    But Nancy thinks she's the Christ-child.  Nancy thinks she's infallible.  She refuses to own her actions, she refuses to take accountability.

    That is reflected among the political class with regards to Iraq.  

    And now, because they've gotten away with it on such a huge issue, Nancy wants to deploy the same tactics on a hair cut.

    The event itself, my opinion, was minor.  What made it major and why we have to discuss it here?  Because she refuses to take accountability.

    I don't give a damn if it was a 'set-up' or not.  If they laid a trap out for her?  Well she took the actions that made her the focus that she is now.

    It's on her and she needs to take accountability.

    Shame on anyone who tries to rescue her on this.

    She was in public.  She is a public servant.  She had hectored others for not wearing masks.  She thought she could get away with it despite cries of "the science, the science, the science!"  She needs to take accountability and her refusal to do so makes her not just look like a stupid hypocrite, it also makes her look very, very immature.

    You wouldn't let your child get away with this nonsense of avoiding accountability, you damn sure shouldn't let a professional politician -- one who's been in office for far too many years.

    Emmanuel Macron is another hideous person holding political office.  A neoliberal who cares nothing about the people he supposedly represents.  The protests and the attacks on the protesters in France have been one of the biggest stories the US press has ignored in the last 12 months.  Macron is a western neoliberal with many friends -- not just Barack.  


    Khaled Yacoub Oweis (THE NATIONAL) reports:

    French President Emmanuel Macron in Baghdad on Wednesday discussed solving Iraq's power cuts with nuclear energy and expressed support for Prime Minister Mustafa Al Kadhimi's push to contain armed groups outside the control of the state.

    The French leader is the first western head of state to travel to the country since the new Iraqi government took office four months ago.

    Mr Al Kadhimi said he discussed with Mr Macron "a future project" to use nuclear energy to produce electricity and solve decades-long power shortages.

    He said the nuclear project would be under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency and would create jobs.


    There is so much wrong and appalling with that.  First off, the Iraq War was started on lies.  One of the lies was, per Bully Boy Bush, 'we have recently learned that Saddam sought yellow cake uranium from Africa.'  Well if Macron gets his way, the next Saddam the US creates will have access to basic materials in Iraq and won't have to seek it from outside.  

    Second, nuclear energy is not safe.  It does not become safe.  There is always the chance that an accident can happen or, for that matter, a terrorist attack which turns a nuclear plant into a nuclear bomb.  We don't need more nuclear facilities.  (Yes, I know some alleged 'greens' back nuclear energy -- well there's always at least one whore in every group.)  

    Third the waste has to be disposed of.  Are we going to send it into space?  Are you going to let your neighborhood be a dumping ground?  Where's it going to go?

    Macron works for the nuclear industry -- and anyone else willing to pay him off.  He does not work for the people of France and how dare he go to Iraq, a country that is already suffering, and try to pimp nuclear energy.  Shame on him.  I didn't think he could get anymore disgusting but I was wrong.

    Karwan Faidhi Dri covers the visit for RUDAW.


    In other news, Caleb Weiss and Joe Truzman (LONG WAR JOURNAL) report on talk of a new group in Iraq resorting to violence:

    Guardians of the Blood, a purported new militant group claiming to be a part of the so-called Islamic Resistance in Iraq recently published a statement and video claiming responsibility for two Aug. 24 attacks allegedly against a ‘CIA security convoy’ and an ‘American convoy.’

    “The heroic mujahideen on the evening of Monday 08/24/2020 unleashed their anger and fire for their revenge on an American military convoy retreating from Camp Taji towards Ain al-Assad base,” Guardians of the Blood said in the statement.

    The video, posted on Aug. 30, showed a convoy of large trucks traveling on a busy road. After a few moments, an explosion occurred beside one of the vehicles. The scene then repeated itself before ending.

    Additionally, the group said its men were responsible for targeting a “vehicle belonging to American intelligence” between Erbil and Mosul. 



    AP's James LaPorta Tweets:

    #BREAKING Scoop:
    @USArmy
    Ranger Sgt. Maj. Thomas Payne of
    @USASOCNews
    will receive the Medal of Honor for a 2015 Iraq raid that rescued 70 prisoners set to be executed by ISIS. President
    @realDonaldTrump
    will present the award to Payne on 9/11. apnews.com/0fd2ac443f7efa
    Image
    1:14 PM · Sep 2, 2020


    You can find LaPorta's report here.

    Turning to the topic of political persecution, Vijay Prashad (BNN) reports on political prisoner Julian Assange:


    On September 7, 2020, Julian Assange will leave his cell in Belmarsh Prison in London and attend a hearing that will determine his fate. After a long period of isolation, he was finally able to meet his partner-Stella Moris-and see their two sons-Gabriel (age three) and Max (age one)-last week. After the visit, Moris said that he looked to be in "a lot of pain."

    The hearing that Assange will face has nothing to do with the reasons for his arrest from the embassy of Ecuador in London on April 11, 2019. He was arrested that day for his failure to surrender in 2012 to the British authorities, who would have extradited him to Sweden; in Sweden, at that time, there were accusations of sexual offenses against Assange that were dropped in November 2019. Indeed, after the Swedish authorities decided not to pursue Assange, he should have been released by the UK government. But he was not.

    The true reason for the arrest was never the charge in Sweden; it was the desire of the U.S. government to have him brought to the United States on a range of charges. On April 11, 2019, the UK Home Office spokesperson said, "We can confirm that Julian Assange was arrested in relation to a provisional extradition request from the United States of America. He is accused in the United States of America of computer-related offenses."


    New content at THIRD:



    The following sites updated: