One of the worst members of the House of Representatives is MTG. Yet she truly thinks she has a shot at the US Senate. Daniel Villareal (LGBTQ NATION) reports:
Greene thinks she can be that nominee. She recently told NewsNation,
“The polling shows I can win the governor’s primary or I can win the
Senate primary. That’s a choice that I can make, and I’ll give it some
thought.”
However, a recent poll suggests that she’s wrong about her chances.
The poll, released last week by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC),
shows Ossoff (D) holding “commanding leads” over three other Republican
candidates, the publication wrote, including Greene, Secretary of State
Brad Raffensperger, and Insurance Commissioner John King.
Though none of those aforementioned Republicans have publicly pledged to run, here’s how they fared against Ossoff in AJC’s poll:
Raffensperger got 39% of respondents’ support, and Ossoff got 48%.
King got 38% of respondents’ support, and Ossoff got 51%.
Greene got 37% of respondents’ support, and Ossoff got 54%.
The fact that Ossoff got the highest level of support when paired
against Greene suggests that she would be a uniquely unpopular candidate
who, in this poll, compelled 60% of independents and 10% of Republicans
to choose a Democrat.
That is hilarious. Sadly, so much of her life isn't.
U.S.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican from Georgia, bought shares
of Palantir Technologies days before the U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement announced a $30 million contract with the company.
Rating:
True (About this rating?)
Context:
Though
Greene made those trades, we could not determine whether she ordered
them herself or whether her portfolio manager made that decision without
her input.
Crooked Marjorie. Profitting from public service while others suffer and it doesn't bother her, no, not one bit.
It's
tempting to just blame the source material because THE FOUR SEASONS
made for a very bad film. But grasp that even that hideous film was
better than what Tina's churned out.
Need an example?
What
supposed to pass for an exciting and presumably satisfying ending in
the mini-series takes place on the ice. Kate and Jack have wandered on
the ice in winter. No one can save them from the ice possibly
cracking. Will Forte, as her husband Jack, gets Tina's Kate to drop
down to the ice and for them to roll themselves towards the shore. They
make it and celebrate. And we're supposed to celebrate with them. But
we don't because the scene's poorly lit (not as poorly lit as the ones
that make Tina Fey's neck and chin repulsive in side view) and because
it's a cheat. Since Lillian Gish starred in 1920's WAY DOWN EAST, film
audiences have been conditioned for the ice to crack. Not only is that
the case in WAY DOWN EAST all the way through the latest James Bond NO
TIME TO DIE, but, grasp this, it was also true in Alda's FOUR SEASONS.
That's right the one dramatic and cinematic moment from Alda's film is stripped from the mini-series. Wait, it gets worse.
The
scene also makes no sense. That's because in Alda's film it didn't
have to do with the Tina character (played by Carol Burnett) or with her
husband. In Alda's film, the young character Ginny (who steals Sandy
Dennis husband away from her) is the one on the ice. Danny (Coleman
Domingo's character in the mini-series) is the one who finds her but
he's also the one who the ice breaks under. Ginny goes to alert the
others, they grab Danny's car and go off to rescue him. The car falls
through the ice but they rescue Danny.
Time
and again, Tina throws scenes to herself. Scenes that didn't mean much
in the original but at least made sense in terms of character and plot.
Need another example? Ginny.
Ginny was a full character in the film. She even ended up married to Nick and pregnant with their child.
Though
Ginny in the mini-series is 32, Erika Henningsen is playing a character
Tina has conceived as an airhead between the ages of 18 and 21.
Tina's
attacking younger people with the rewrite on Ginny. She's a fool. She
has no sense of humor. She can only eat and drink certain things
(mushroom coffee being only one example). She does not get married to
Nick or get pregnant because Tina couldn't go to town on her the way she
does if the character warranted any sympathy. Even when picking out
photos for Nick's memorial (Nick doesn't die in the film, he and Ginny
are both integrated into gatherings with the others by film's end),
Tina's Ginny is just an airhead who doesn't realize what's good taste
and what's not and whether or not a photo of dead Nick with a boner in
his pants might offend.
It's a hatefully written character and that falls on Tina Fey.
Again,
THE FOUR SEASONS, the 1981 film, was not seen by many people. But it
clearly was not seen by the critics rushing to glorify the damage Tina
Fey has inflicted upon her source material.
Vanity
is not just Barbra Streisand or Kevin Costner needing butt scenes in
their films (THE MAIN EVENT, REVENGE, DANCES WITH WOLVES, etc). Vanity
is also Tina Fey turning a 107 minute film into a mini-series twice as
long and stealing every strong scene for her own character.
Vanity is also Tina Fey not grasping that she doesn't have the skill or talent to pull it off.
Ava and C.I. did an epic this week. It's also their first piece solely about an entertainment program in over a year. They've been mixing the news and entertainment for months. I think their longterm fans have been waiting for something like this for some time.
Tuesday, May 6, 2025. Crazy Chump is endangering us in more ways than
we could ever imagine and there's no one in the Cabinet to be
responsible and call out the risks he's creating for the American
people.
Starting with Lawrence O'Donnell last night on MSNBC.
It's not just me and it's not just you, Donald Chump comes off more and more
like the deceased father in the play OH DAD, POOR DAD, MAMMA'S HUNG YOU
IN THE CLOSET AND I'M FEELIN' SO SAD?
Donald
Trump gave a wide-ranging NBC interview, and his various answers led to
renewed discussion about his purported "cognitive decline."
Among
other things, Trump was asked, "Your secretary of state says everyone
who's here, citizens and noncitizens, deserve due process... Do you
agree?" The president then replied, saying, "I don't know... I'm not,
I'm not a lawyer. I don't know."
He's
not a lawyer? He's also not a first time president. He was president
from January 2017 to January 2021. Does he not know that? Does he not
know that he took an oath to uphold the Constitution back in January 2017
and again in January 2025? Has he never read the Constitution he took an oath to uphold?
Back to McAfee:
Former
Republican lawmaker Joe Walsh, for instance, pointed out that Trump
said of the economy, "I think the good parts are the Trump economy and
the bad parts are the Biden economy."
"He is a
horrible, pathetic human being. He’s everything you teach your children
NOT to be," Walsh said before discussing Trump's potential decline.
"There
should be coverage of Trump’s cognitive decline. Massive coverage," the
ex-congressman said. "Because it’s an issue. A huge issue."
And Walsh wasn't the only one.
Independent
journalist Aaron Rupar said that Trump's "Meet the Press interview was
just the latest illustration that dude's brain is gone."
This cognitive decline is on full display as REUTERS reports:
President
Donald Trump said on Monday he had nothing to do with the production of
an image that showed him dressed like a pope but said it was done in
jest.
"I just saw it last evening," Trump told
reporters in the Oval Office. He said his wife, Melania Trump, thought
it was cute. Some in the Catholic community have criticized the image.
He
just saw it Sunday evening? Possibly, he's lying. He is rather well
known for his non-stop lying. But maybe the brain's turned to complete
mush and he no longer remember that he actually posted the photo himself
to his own social media on Friday? It was reposted to White House
accounts on Sunday. But he put it up on his social media Friday. Does
he not remember that? Is he that far gone?
A
federal judge used President Donald Trump's own boastful words against
him to halt an executive order that took aim at a major Washington,
D.C., law firm, reported MSNBC.
U.S. Judge
Beryl Howell issued a permanent injunction to blockTrump from
retaliating against Perkins Coie due to the president's political
grievances. Trump's order had limited Perkins Coie lawyers' "access to
government buildings, revoked their security clearances and ordered
federal agencies to terminate contracts with the firm."
But
Judge Howell found that the Trump administration had "singled out
Perkins Coie based on the content of its speech and actions," which
infringed up on the firm and its attorneys' First Amendment rights.
To
make her ruling, Howell did something "unusual," according to MSNBC.
She "used Trump’s subsequent agreements with other firms — and his
boasts about them — as evidence against his administration."
Perkins
Coie was one of six law firms Trump targeted for representing his
"political opponents or whose lawyers were involved in investigations
into the president during his first term," MSNBC reported.
Howell
cited a Trump quote from an April event, when he claimed "Have you
noticed that lots of law firms have been signing up with Trump? $100
million, another $100 million, for damages that they’ve done. But they
give you $100 million and then they announce, ‘We have done nothing
wrong.’ And I agree, they’ve done nothing wrong. But what the hell,
they’ve given me a lot of money considering they’ve done nothing wrong."
Again,
has the cognitive decline become so great that he no longer can
remember what he's saying in public and on camera? Cognitive decline
would explain his nonsense about two dolls and five pencils. Elizabeth Crisp (THE HILL) quotes former Mike Pence aid Marc Short:
“I
think it’s really damaging messaging,” said Short, who now co-chairs
the conservative Advancing American Freedom, Pence’s policy and advocacy
organization. “I think everybody understands he’s very financially
wealthy, but beginning to tell the American people how many dolls or how
many pencils they can have, I think, suggests a little bit of an
elitism perspective.”
President
Donald Trump's cognitive ability was questioned again Monday after he
rambled his way through a simple question regarding the White House's
decision to reopen Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary in California.
Trump
bizarrely likened the decision to being a "movie maker" when questioned
by a reporter in the Oval Office. "Well, I guess I was supposed to be a
movie maker. We're talking—we started with the movie making and will
end. I mean, it—it represents something very strong, very powerful in
terms of law and order," he said.
When
Trump first announced the decision Sunday, he said it was aimed at
keeping dangerous criminals far away from people they want to hurt,
according to a post on his social media platform Truth Social. Trump
also mentioned a museum dedicated to the prison as he darted from
tangent to tangent.
"Our
country needs law and order. Alcatraz is, uh, I would say, the
ultimate, right? Alcatraz. Sing Sing and Alcatraz. Eh, the movies. But,
uh, it's right now a museum, believe it or not, a lot of people go
there. It housed the, uh, most violent criminals in the world, and
nobody ever escaped. One person almost got there. But they, as you know
the story, they found his clothing rather badly ripped up," he said.
The
episode has once again caused Americans to question their leader's
cognitive ability. Some even compared Trump's rambling to that of former
President Joe Biden.
He's
got a whole Cabinet of crazy backing him up. That includes the hideous
Junior. Marcia detailed the dangers of the two last night in "Chump and Junior are destroying America's future." Junior is crazed. And he's losing power as a result.
We
didn't take a position here re: vaccines and autism. As I explained
many times, in my offline life, I fundraise for autism and it had ripped
the community apart, ripped families apart. So I didn't have that
discussion, I focused on fundraising and on science. Then crazy Junior
had to haul his steroid ass into the political arena. And that's why I
had to come out publicly as against the notion that vaccines cause
autism. Grasp that I've fundraised decades and never had to take a
stance on that because it had destroyed families, that debate.
And Junior was part of that destruction.
So
some good news there is that among families who make large donations --
including one family in particular in the Bay Area -- Junior has no
pull.
What he's done, the totality of it all,
has turned people against him. The nonsense he's pulled has made a
large number of people stop embracing him and his con job.
Autism researchers and advocates are pushing back against the creation of an autism database
– meant to track the health of autistic people in a major research
study – and pointing to the ways such databases could be misused.
While
the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) denies it’s a
registry, the agency did confirm a sweeping database of autistic people
will power a $50m study on autism. The health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, said last week that he plans to announce results from the study within months.
A petition
against the registry gained thousands of signatures in a single day,
jumping from 2,500 to nearly 35,000 signatures within 24 hours.
“I’m
a quiet person who likes to just be in the background,” said first-time
petition creator Ryan Smith, a parent of two neurodiverse children
living in Idaho. He also didn’t want to make himself a target.
It's
garbage like that move by Junior that's decimated his support, that's
driven people who thought he listened to them and cared about their
families away from him for good. Hes a con artist and he's exposed
himself. Some BLUESKY reaction.
The
messaging app seen being used by President Donald Trump's former
national security advisor, Michael Waltz, is temporarily suspending
services following a reported hack.
"Out of an abundance of
caution, all TeleMessage services have been temporarily suspended," a
spokesperson for TeleMessage's parent company, Smarsh, said.
A
recent photo of Waltz indicated he was communicating on TeleMessage
with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, director
of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and special envoy Steve Witkoff.
The
latest news highlights enormous gaps in the Trump administration's
cybersecurity measures. Experts have warned that sensitive data could
quickly land in the wrong hands, making apps like Signal and TeleMessage
obvious — and apparently easy — targets for foreign adversary hacking
groups.
Waltz was ousted from his national
security advisor role on May 1, alongside his deputy Alex Wong. While
it's unclear what the exact reasoning was for the demotion, inside
sources told The Guardian last week that the president had briefly
considered firing Waltz after he accidentally added The Atlantic editor
Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal group chat that contained discussions about
war plans in Yemen.
Given the
latest news, the situation could be even worse than we thought. Not
only was Waltz previously using an unmodified version of Signal to
discuss highly sensitive information — a major deviation from Department
of Defense protocol — but the Signal knockoff he was spotted using is
incredibly vulnerable to hacking as well.
As
404 reports, the hacker was unable to obtain messages between Waltz and
his accomplices. However, they did access to data related to the Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) agency, the crypto exchange Coinbase, and
other financial institutions.
The data included names and contacts of government officials, as well as usernames and passwords for the app's backend.
"I would say the whole process took about 15-20 minutes," the hacker told the publication. "It wasn’t much effort at all."
"If
I could have found this in less than 30 minutes then anybody else could
too," they added. "And who knows how long it’s been vulnerable?"
We
have a huge security problem that Chump refuses to address. Instead he
has us all at risk because he won't take the needed measures and fire
the incompetents. That includes the ridiculous Pete Hegseth who
continues to wreck the Defense Dept. Haley Britzky and Natasha Bertrand (CNN) report:
US
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has ordered senior Pentagon
leadership to cut the number of four-star generals and admirals by at
least 20% across the military, according to a memo signed by Hegseth
dated Monday and obtained by CNN.
As of 2023, there were 37 four-star generals and admirals across the entire military.
The
memo also directs the Pentagon to cut the number of general officers in
the National Guard by 20%, and to cut the total number of general and
flag officers across the military by 10%. There are currently about 900
general and flag officers — those with the rank of one star or higher —
across the military.
In his memo, Hegseth wrote
that the cuts are a “critical” step toward “removing redundant force
structure to optimize and streamline leadership by reducing excess
general and flag officer positions.”
I
guess I just don't understand what qualifies a weekend talk show host
to make such determinations. I hope that real events don't bitch slap
Hegseth across the face. I don't care if he gets slapped but I do care
if real events pull the US into some conflict and suddenly we're short
staffed because a TV personality was convinced that "I would say over a
third are actively complicit" (his words) are 'woke' and so he got rid
of needed generals. Did that come to him while he was under the dryer?
While he was getting a blow out?
Hegseth has never been qualified for this job but he remains in it.
This
administration is insane from the top down and they are putting future
generations at risk with what they are doing to education, science and
medicine. They are putting us all at risk by refusing to follow basic
security protocols. They are putting us all at risk with the disaster
that is now our FAA.
Rachel Maddow outlined
that last night on MSNBC. My hope was to note that. Despite the fact
that MSNBC has posted three segments of her show and one segment in a
mix of other shows, they didn't post the FAA segment which was the most
important one of last night. I'm not a MORNING JOE fan and ignore it.
But the FAA story is too important and they've discussed it this
morning.
How are there not Congressional hearings regarding the above revelations?
Again,
Chump is a menace. He is not a public servant, he's a greedy crook.
He's is not interested in the public safety, he is only interested in
lining his own pockets.