Zucky Zuckerberg, what have you done? You
made a fool of everyone. Especially yourself. Do you need a good
laugh? All the sucking up the Zucker did to Chump was in vain. Tom Boggioni (RAW STORY) reports:
In
a deep dive into Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's face-off with the Federal
Trade Commission anti-trust investigation over his acquisition of
Instagram and WhatsApp, the Wall Street Journal is reporting that the
controversial founder of Facebook placed a bet that Donald Trump would
intervene -- and it never happened.
According
to the Journal's Dana Mattioli, Rebecca Ballhaus and Josh Dawsey, the
FTC is in the process of getting Zuckerberg to admit he bought the two
apps in an effort to "neutralize" them as a threat to his core business
and is seeking up to $30 billion in penalties.
Instead,
Zuckerberg offered up $450 million which former FTC Chair Lina Khan
derided as "delusional" in an interview with the Journal, adding, "Mark
bought his way out of competing, so I’m not surprised that he thinks he
can buy his way out of law enforcement, too. His proposed remedy, like
his market strategy, is: ‘let my illegal monopoly keep monopolizing.’”
The
report notes that it appears Zuckerberg thought his paltry offer would
get him off the hook with Trump also weighing in on his behalf.
According
to the report, Zuckerberg contacted FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson in
March with his lowball offer with the Journal adding, "On the call,
Zuckerberg sounded confident that President Trump would back him up with
the FTC, said people familiar with the matter. The billionaire Facebook
co-founder had been developing closer ties to Trump—his company donated
$1 million to Trump’s inauguration and settled a $25 million
lawsuit—and had been pressing the president in recent weeks to intervene
in the monopoly lawsuit."
Zucky Zuckerberg, the "Sexy Sadie" of today, the ultimate fake ass.
He’d
paid $1 million into Donald Trump’s inaugural fund. He’d settled a
lawsuit the president launched over being blackballed by Facebook for a
whopping $25 million. He sat in Trump’s box at the inauguration and
shuttled between the White House and Mar-a-Lago to ingratiate himself
with his new friend.
FACEBOOK
and META were garbage products but he rode their popularity to what
passed for fame and prestige. He lost both and so much more when he got
in bed with Chump. He's been exposed for the hack he is and he's
harmed the image of FACEBOOK.
In Menlo Park, pedestrians are hearing a recording claiming to be Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.
“Hi
this is Mark Zuckerberg, but real ones call me the Zuck,” the voice
announces. “You know, it’s normal to feel uncomfortable or even violated
as we forcibly insert AI into every facet of your conscious experience.
And I just want to assure you — you don’t need to worry because there
is absolutely nothing you can do to stop it. Anyway, see ya.”
Meghan
Horrigan-Taylor, chief communications officer for the city of Palo
Alto, said that tampering likely occurred last Friday. City employees
first noticed the voice message Saturday morning.
In all 12 intersections were “malfunctioning,” said Horrigan-Taylor.
“City
staff have disabled the audible feature until further repairs can be
made,” she told NBC-7. “Other traffic signals in the City were checked
and the impact is isolated. Signal operations are otherwise unaffected,
and motorists are reminded to always exercise caution around
pedestrians.”
Everyone laughs at Zuck. David Gardner (THE DAILY BEAST) reminds, "He’d
paid $1 million into Donald Trump’s inaugural fund. He’d settled a
lawsuit the president launched over being blackballed by Facebook for a
whopping $25 million. He sat in Trump’s box at the inauguration and
shuttled between the White House and Mar-a-Lago to ingratiate himself
with his new friend." He threw it all away.
Wednesday, April 16, 2025. Whistle blower Daniel Berulis comes
forward with disturbing reports on DOGE, Chump continues to wreck the
economy and the American dream, MSNBC's web team is still asleep this
morning so could someone please wake them, Dems in Congress talk of
going to El Salvador to investigate what's going on, and much more.
Let's
start with Alien Musk's DOGE which has existed with no real authority
and certainly no oversight. We've trusted Musk with access to this
country's most sensitive information despite the fact that he's a
security risk due to his drug usage, despite the fact that he's depended
on huge amounts of money from China and despite the fact that he's not
an American citizen (he's first a citizen of South Africa, then Canada
and then the US). From yesterday's ALL THINGS CONSIDERED (NPR):
MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:
President Trump's Department
of Government Efficiency team, or DOGE, appears to be collecting
sensitive data from all over the government. A whistleblower has come
forward by filing an official disclosure to Congress. The disclosure is
over concerning activity at one independent federal agency - the
National Labor Relations Board. NPR's Jenna McLaughlin spoke to that
whistleblower. He described to NPR what he saw and how DOGE appeared to
go to great lengths to try to cover its tracks.
JENNA
MCLAUGHLIN, BYLINE: It was a Friday afternoon in February when Daniel
Berulis got a call from his boss. DOGE, the new federal cost-cutting
unit, effectively led by billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk, would be
arriving soon.
DANIEL BERULIS: I was working on a
spreadsheet for some budgeting stuff, and I got a call from my boss
saying, hey, it's possible DOGE will show up.
MCLAUGHLIN:
The following week - according to his official disclosure to Congress -
Berulis and his colleagues watched a black SUV with a police escort pull
into the parking garage of the National Labor Relations Board in
Southeast Washington, D.C. The small, independent federal agency
investigates and adjudicates complaints about unfair labor practices. It
stores reams of potentially sensitive data, such as private legal notes
in ongoing labor investigations or confidential lists of union
organizers.
Most of that data lives on the Cloud, a virtual
computer system that can be accessed remotely. It's Berulis' job to
watch over the cloud and make sure no single user has access to data or
systems they don't need. But for DOGE, those policies and guidelines
didn't seem to apply, Berulis says. They had a very specific request.
BERULIS: Do not log the accounts. Don't log the access and stay out of our way.
MCLAUGHLIN: That was just the start for Berulis and his colleagues.
BERULIS:
That was a huge red flag. That's something that you just don't do. It
violates every core concept of security and best practice.
MCLAUGHLIN:
After his suspicions were raised, Berulis was able to hunt down a few
details about what took place while DOGE had access. In his disclosure
to Congress, there's a ton of complicated technical detail. But here's
what it says.
There's clear evidence DOGE got the highest
level of access to the system, that a big chunk of data left the
agency's internal case management system, followed by another chunk of
data leaving the agency itself and that whoever had done those things
had turned off security tools and network monitoring logs. They deleted
records and appeared to try and disguise the chunks of data leaving the
agency as routine web traffic. And after the DOGE accounts were created,
someone with an IP address in Russia started trying to log in to the
NLRB system, using a username and password that DOGE had created. Even
though the attempts were blocked, Berulis says that made him worried the
system was more vulnerable now.
The NLRB tells NPR the
agency did not authorize DOGE to access their systems, and that there's
no record of DOGE requesting it. They also said there was a recent
internal investigation that ruled out a breach. However, the disclosure
includes forensic evidence and records of communications that seem to
tell a different story.
BERULIS: Why was that done? And
that's a purposeful effort. That doesn't just happen. Logs don't just
disappear. Tools don't just turn themselves off randomly. Everything in a
computer has a cause and effect. That means it has to have a trigger.
MCLAUGHLIN:
NPR has talked to 10 outside cybersecurity experts - embedded in
companies, government agencies and the private sector - who reviewed
Berulis' claims. They say the activity is suspicious and that there's no
reason a legitimate user would act this way or remove data that is
protected by multiple federal laws, including the Privacy Act. They say
it is hard to definitively prove what happened without further access to
the NLRB systems or without an investigation by agencies with more
resources, like the FBI. But from what they can see, none of this
behavior is normal. They told NPR the shadowy tactics described in the
disclosure are the kinds of things criminals and hackers from China and
Russia like to do. Meanwhile, several labor law experts who spoke to NPR
say they believe there's no possible reason why DOGE should have had
access to or removed NLRB's sensitive labor data.
SHARON
BLOCK: There is nothing that I can see about what DOGE is doing that
follows any of the standard procedures for how you do an audit that has
integrity and that's meaningful and that will actually produce results.
MCLAUGHLIN:
Sharon Block is the director of Harvard Law School Center for Labor and
a Just Economy. She has held key labor policy jobs in multiple
administrations, including as a member of the National Labor Relations
Board. She said she thinks DOGE's statements about cutting waste and its
behavior don't match up.
BLOCK: That mismatch between what
they're doing and what we know the established professional way to do
what they say they're doing - that just kind of gives away the store -
that they are not about actually finding more efficient ways for the
government to operate.
Last night on THE RACHEL
MADDOW SHOW (MSNBC), Rachel spoke with the whistle blower and with his
attorney. We'd embed the video here but MSNBC's internet team appears
to be sleeping on the job and not understanding the importance of
breaking news.
The whistleblower report, which NBC News
has reviewed a copy of, comes as DOGE and Trump’s billionaire adviser
Elon Musk continue to face multiple lawsuits questioning their access to computer systems across the federal government.
Berulis,
who works at the labor board, wrote in the declaration that within days
of DOGE staffers arriving in March, he noticed a series of “anomalous”
events in the board’s computer systems. Those included changes to the
use of multi-factor authentication, which is a widely used security
protocol, and internal alerting systems being switched off, he wrote in
the 14-page statement.
He also wrote that he
tracked what appeared to be the outbound transfer of around 10 gigabytes
or more of data — “the equivalent of a full stack of encyclopedias” if
the data were all text files, he wrote. He wrote that the removal was
“extremely unusual because data almost never directly leaves NLRB’s
databases.”
The database accessed by DOGE
contained personally identifiable information of “claimants and
respondents with pending matters before the agency” as well as
confidential business information gathered during investigations, he
wrote.
e added that after DOGE gained access to the labor
board’s systems, there was an increase in attempted logins from
locations outside the United States including from a user with an
internet protocol (IP) address in Russia. He wrote that the person with
the Russian IP address appeared to have a correct username and password,
created minutes earlier by DOGE engineers, and was blocked from logging
in only because of their location.
“Those attempts were blocked, but they were especially alarming,” Berulis wrote.
Berulis
included in his disclosure several screenshots from a computer
workstation that he says are evidence of data being transferred. He
wrote that he has almost two decades of experience in his field and that
he has held a Top Secret security clearance.
Musk is currently embroiled in a legal battle
with the NLRB over the agency’s ability to enforce labor law. Attorneys
for Musk’s SpaceX argued before a court in November that the NLRB’s structure is unconstitutional.
A ruling against the agency could severely diminish its power.
The legal battle began after the NLRB accused SpaceX of illegally firing employees who had publicly criticized Musk.
The nonprofit Whistleblower Aid, which is representing Berulis legally, passed along his sworn disclosure in a letter
to Sens. Tom Cotton and Mark Warner, the top Republican and Democrat on
the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, respectively. It asked the
committee to probe the matter.
The letter
describes DOGE’s actions as possibly constituting a “significant
cybersecurity breach that likely has and continues to expose our
government to foreign intelligence and our nation’s adversaries.”
It
also claims that ”someone physically taped a threatening note to Mr.
Berulis’ home door with photographs – taken via a drone – of him walking
in his neighborhood” as he prepared to make his disclosure. The note,
which Berulis declined to share with Reuters, specifically referenced
the impending disclosure, the letter says.
The
spying and intimidation attempts? They started before he went
public. Daniel Berulis' attorney explained that to Rachel Maddow last
night. Which means that DOGE is also spying on government employees.
Yesterday on CNN, Jake Tapper reported on this story and spoke with
Daniel.
It’s
worth underlining the caveat that no one quite knows where the data
allegedly pilfered from the NLRB is going—if indeed it has left the
agency at all. But the information allegedly leaving the NLRB would be
extraordinarily valuable to corporate titans like Musk looking for a leg
up on rivals, as well as a window into the inner workings of the labor
unions they despise. It would also explain why Musk is involved with
DOGE to begin with. As a number of his companies, especially Tesla,
struggle, the government systems DOGE now controls could provide
invaluable information.
The theft of
personal information also points to another more nefarious motivation
for Musk and DOGE. It’s already abundantly clear that the group will not
reduce the deficit. It likely will not even decrease federal spending,
which is already $100 billion higher under Trump than it was under Biden
at this point in his term. Instead, the group’s slashing of regulations
and bureaucracy is aimed not at reducing “waste” but at cutting the
many governmental layers that exist to fight risk—and fraud.
In
another sense, it really doesn’t matter if this information is being
used for nefarious corporate reasons at all. What matters is that
unaccountable coders with close ties to the world’s richest man have
their mitts on the personal information of millions of Americans—that’s
bad no matter what they’re doing with it.
Some reaction on BLUESKY.
Be really great if MSNBC could get Rachel's interview with Daniel uploaded to their YOUTUBE channel this morning.
Moving
over to the topic of the economy, the elephant in the room is the
breasty Donald Chump who continues to wreck the US economy. David J. Lynch (WASHINGTON POST) reports
that, since January 20th, the US dollar is on the decline having lost
10% of its value during that time period -- 5% of the decline occurred
in the last few weeks as Chump's tariff scheme was implemented. "Bad
news," Lynch explains, "for Americans traveling abroad and could also
aggravate inflation by making foreign goods more expensive."
On the topic of the economy, we noted yesterday that Chump was destroying travel to the US and the billions of dollars that this travel results in:
Other
damage he's doing? The United States makes a lot of money from
foreigners traveling here for various events, conventions and sight
seeing journeys. Dallas, TX? A magnet for people around the world who
want to remember President John F. Kennedy. And a ton of people do
because President Kennedy was a monumental and historical figure --
unlike his nephew Tiny Balls Junior who is an embarrassment. Florida?
The incredible beaches. Key Largo, Key West. DISNEY WORLD, UNIVERSAL
STUDIOS FLORIDA THEME PARK, Daytona Beach, The Dahil Museum, etc, etc.
California? DISNEYLAND Park, the wineries, the film studios, the Golden
Gate Bridge, Golden Gate Park, Alcatraz Island, Pier 39, the beaches,
the San Diego Zoo, Catalina Island, Big Sur, Joshua Tree, Big Basin
Redwoods State Park,
Hollywood Walk of Fame, Santa Monica Pier, San Francisco Museum of
Modern Art, Mission San Juan Bautista . . . New York has the Statue of
Liberty, the Museum Of Modern Art, Central Park, Empire State Building,
Time Square, Grand Central Terminal . . . That's just a few things in a
few states. Most of the states have major tourist attractions. And
tourists from outside the US coming here accounts for a lot of money
each year.
Do you get how
much money that is? How many industries that impacts? You've got the
airline industry, you've got the car industry if the visitors rent a
car, you've got taxis and Ubers, you've got hotels and motels, you've
got eateries, you've got bars, many of the points of interest have fees
visitors have to pay, you've got the clothing industry since travelers
often purchase an outfit or two (or a t-shirt or two) in addition to
what they've packed, you've got shops -- souvenir and regular shops.
Or it did.
Do we grasp how much money Chump's running off?
In
2023, international travelers poured an estimated $213 billion --
billion -- into the US economy. That amounted to approximately $584
million a day.
And now
Chump's making us pariah around the world. See, sending people to a
gulag in El Salvador doesn't really argue for freedom and democracy.
And since Chump declares these deportations and imprisonments require no
trials, if you're in Paris, you really think Las Vegas or whatever is
worth seeing when, while you're visiting the US, you might accidentally
get caught up in one of Chump's dragnets and end up being taken not back
to France but a to prison -- one where the are no rules or guidelines
and people are tortured.
Ignoring
the many tales of horror inflicted upon innocent tourists to the United
States, California Gov. Gavin Newsom encouraged Canadians to visit the
Bear Republic. Canadians said no.
California
depends on international tourism, and the Trump administration's new
Draconian policies will hit the state hard. In 2024, nearly 1.8 million
Canadians visited California, contributing around $3.72 billion to the
state's economy. Only Mexico boasts higher international tourism numbers
than the Golden State, and you can be sure they will enthusiastically
not visit either. In an attempt to build some confidence in potential
international travelers, Newsom took to TikTok with an invitation.
Canadians politely shoved it back in his face.
Janna Brancolini (THE DAILY BEAST) points out, "President
Donald Trump’s policies could cost the U.S. economy $90 billion this
year in lost tourism and export revenue, according to analysts at
Goldman Sachs. Many foreign visitors are avoiding the U.S. over concerns
about increased hostility at the border, including reports about
European tourists being detained for weeks in U.S. immigration centers.
Others are angry about Trump’s trade wars and his treatment of U.S.
allies -- particularly Canada -- and are boycotting U.S. travel and
products."
This topic was also
addressed on THE 11TH HOUR WITH STEPHANIE RUHLE when Stephanie spoke
with Wilfred Frost about the upcoming series -- Sunday, April 27th -- on
his father journaist David Frost -- a six part docuseries entitled
DAVID VS. Stephanie and Wilfred looked at the countries and the drop
in travel to the US with Wilfred noting that Denmark had one of the
highest fallen rates on travel to the US since Chump was sworn in on
January 20th.
Love to post the video but, guess what --
That's right MSNBC's web team just sleeps on the job. We will note
this discussion Stephanie had last night at the start of her program.
Staying on the topic of the economy,
Brad Bannon (THE HILL) explains, "President
Trump has just reached a crucial stage early in the second term of his
presidency. Sandwiched between his abject capitulation on tariffs and
the bitter fight over his tax breaks for fat cats and plutocrats, he now
owns this creaky economy." Andrew Stanton (NEWSWEEK) elaborates, "A
growing number of Americans are blaming President Donald Trump, rather
than former President Joe Biden, for the state of the economy, according
to two recent polls." And what's the conclusion to the growing feeling of mistrust toward Chump and his GOP tariff boosters? Maria Villarroel (LATIN TIMES) explains, "As
the Trump administration continues defending tariffs and the
uncertainty they have created in the global economy, voters are
reacting, with more saying they trust Democrats more than Republicans to
handle the economy for the first time since 2021, a new poll shows. The
poll in question was conducted by Morning Consult among 2,203
registered U.S. voters across the country between April 11-13. It found
that more trust Democrats in Congress more than their Republican
counterparts to handle the economy (46% to 43%)." More bad news for
Chump via Miles Klee (ROLLING STONE):
New
polling from the University of Massachusetts Amherst reveals that after
almost three months in office, a majority of respondents disapprove of
Trump's actions in office. Just 27 percent said they "Strongly Approve"
of his job performance, with another 17 percent indicating they
"Somewhat Approve" of him so far in his second term, for total
favorables of 44 percent. By comparison, 44 percent "Strongly
Disapprove," and 7 percent "Somewhat Disapprove," for an unfavorability
rate of 51 percent.
Trump is also
underwater on every issue apart from immigration. At least 40 percent of
respondents said he has handled jobs, foreign affairs, civil rights,
inflation, and trade "Not Well At All," with the president receiving
especially poor marks on the latter two economic fronts: a combined 62
percent unfavorable on inflation and 58 percent on trade, presumably as
the cost of household necessities hasn't budged, while Trump's messy
tariffs plans have roiled international markets and investment
portfolios.
Again,
Chump has killed the American dream and few people want to travel into a
den of iniquity. His trashy ways have tarnished the country's image
around the world. And, as we noted yesterday, people don't want to
travel to some country that might deport them -- accidentally or
intentionally -- to a prison in El Salvador. Daniel Hampton (RAW STORY) notes:
A
civil rights attorney sounded the alarm Monday afternoon, warning the
Trump administration is essentially engaged in what he called "human
trafficking."
Trump publicly said he would like
to deport American citizens who are violent offenders to El Salvador,
where they would then serve their prison sentences under a deal with the
Salvadoran government. Trump made the remarks during a White House
meeting with El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele.
[. . .]
The
idea has been widely challenged by legal experts, including civil
rights attorney Scott Hechinger, who took to X on Monday to blast the
president.
"Pay attention: This is human
trafficking. President Trump is already paying to ship humans to El
Salvador & now wants to expand his slave trade. US military
contractors like Eric Prince are salivating, now negotiating to
privatize deportations/imprisonment to make billions," warned Hechinger.
In a separate post, he called the deportation effort a "clear assault on civil liberties and due process rights."
"It
also represents an arguably darker milestone: 'The US government is now
in the business of trafficking migrants on the global market.'"
A darker milestone? Travis Gettys reports that historian Timothy Snyder is also making that argument:
"Yesterday
the president defied a Supreme Court ruling to return a man who was
mistakenly sent to a gulag in another country, celebrated the suffering
of this innocent person, and spoke of sending Americans to foreign
concentration camps," Snyder wrote.
"This is the beginning of an American policy of state terror," he added, "and it has to be identified as such to be stopped."
Snyder,
who is leaving Yale University for the University of Toronto in the
fall, said both Stalinists and Nazis both referred to their own people
as "criminals" and "terrorists," as both Trump and Bukele did at the
White House, to justify their authoritarian abuse and escape from the
law.
"It is that anti-constitutional escapism
that enables abuse," Snyder wrote. "State terror involves not just the
malignant development of state organs of oppression, such as masked men
in black vans, but also the withdrawal of the state from its role as a
guardian of law. What aspiring tyrants present as 'strength,' the
ability to terrorize innocent people, rests on what might be seen as a
more fundamental weakness, which is the withdrawal of the state from the
principle of the rule of law. When we have law, we are all stronger;
when we lack law, everyone is weaker except for the very few who can
direct the coercive power of the state against the rest of us."
In
the face of all of this, Democrats can't afford to be a cowardly James
Carville. People want to see leadership and they want to see that some
elected official actually gives a damn. Phillip M. Bailey (USA TODAY) reports:
Democratic
lawmakers say if a wrongly deported man sent to a supermax prison in El
Salvador isn't brought back to the U.S., they will visit the central
American country, adding further pressure on the Trump administration
for his release.
President Donald Trump met
with El Salvador President Nayib Bukele in the Oval Office on Monday,
where he praised the foreign leader for opening his country's notorious
prison system to alleged gang members and detainees the U.S. wants out
of the country.
[. . .]
"I've
been clear: if President Bukele doesn't want to meet here in D.C., then
I intend to go to El Salvador this week to check on Kilmar Abrego
Garcia's condition and discuss his release," Sen. Chris Van Hollen,
D-MD, said in an April 14 post on X.
"Kilmar was illegally abducted and deported by the Trump (administration). He must be brought home now."
Other
members of Congress say they plan to join Van Hollen's trip, including
Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fl., who described Garcia's detention as a
"kidnapping and illegal detention."
"We need answers now," said Rep. Yassamin Ansari, D-Ariz., who reshared Van Hollen's post on Monday.
This needs to happen.
Brian Taylor Cohen discussed this Congressional trip last night with US House Rep Robert Garcia.
Again, this needs to happen.
And
Lawrence Tribe discussed this last night. Let's post that video. Oh.
Wait. We can't. He did that on MSNBC speaking with Lawrence
O'Donnell. Again, MSNBC's web team is sleeping on the job.
Marjorie Taylor Greene? She's got some conditions.
Maybe it's because of her recent 'winnings' -- see Elaine's "Lock up MTG?" from last
night -- but she is holding a town hall her way. David Badash reports:
Jake Gittes: I wouldn't extort a nickel from my worst enemy. That's where I draw the line.
Loach
Jr.: Well, I'll tell you, Jake. I knew a whore once. For the right
amount of money, she'd piss in a guy's face But she wouldn't s**t on
his chest. You see, that's where she drew the line.
Jake Gittes: Well, Junior, all I can say is: I hope she wasn't too much of a disappointment to you.
Oh,
wait, it just sounds like they're talking about Marjorie. That's
actually from the Jack Nicholson film THE TWO JAKES (script by Robert
Towne). Here's David Badash writing about Marjorie:
In
a social media video, Congresswoman Greene stated, “this is a town hall
that’s strictly for constituents. That means you have to live in my
district, and you had to sign up on the sign up link. That’s important.
Make sure you bring your ID, as we will be verifying that you actually
live in the district and have signed up to be in the town hall.”
Greene,
under scrutiny over recent stock purchases she allegedly made, is
holding the town hall in a county Vice President Kamala Harris carried
in November by 15 percentage points, according to Fox News. The GOP
Congresswoman established additional rules, namely, no
protesting—despite First Amendment protections.
“Also,
this is important for everyone attending the town hall,” she said. “You
need to understand this is not a place to protest. This isn’t a place to
stand up and scream and yell. This is a place to sit and listen, and we
have your questions if you signed up.”
Huh?
Isn't this the same bull dog who went after AOC? Stuck her ugly face in
the mail slot of AOC's office? I understand Marjorie stuck her face in
a lot of slots over the years. But this is when the burly girl was
making her way through the halls of Congress. And burly butch wasn't
one of AOC's constituents.
Poor
Marjorie, she can't handle an honest interaction with her
constituents. Listen to what I just said. "With her constituents." As
if. Marjorie can't handle an honest interaction with anyone. But last
night, she had them tossed out of the meeting, had them tasered and
much worse. Let's hope they all remember when the midterms approach.