Tuesday, January 28, 2025

The big disgraces Nancy Mace and Marjorie Taylor Greene

I would tell Nancy Mace that this latest news was ironic but I fear she would confuse it with "moronic" since she's never struck me as a highly educated person.  Or even a moderately educated person.  But Alex Bollinger (LGBTQ NATION) reports:


Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) has gotten a lot of attention in the media these past several months for her crusade against out Rep. Sarah McBride (D-DE), the first out transgender person elected to Congress, but now conservative Daily Wire podcaster Matt Walsh is outraged at Mace for doing what she railed against: entering a space that conservatives believe should be the exclusive domain of people assigned one sex at birth.
Mace introduced a resolution banning trans women from using women’s facilities at the Capitol shortly after McBride was elected, a move that she admitted was targeted at McBride despite trans people visiting and working at Congress for decades without issue. She posted hundreds of times to social media about her antipathy towards trans people, arguing that trans women are actually men and that they are a threat to women.

Yesterday, Mace brought up one of her past accomplishments in a post on X: She is the first woman to ever graduate from The Citadel, a public military college in South Carolina that banned women until a federal court in 1995 forced it to stop discriminating. She argued that this is what motivates her dislike of transgender people.
“I didn’t fight like hell to become the first woman to graduate from The Citadel just for some man in a miniskirt to take away that achievement,” she posted on X with a picture of herself in college. “Protecting women’s accomplishments isn’t a political talking point for me – it’s personal.”

Anti-trans activist and self-described “theocratic fascist” Matt Walsh took issue with Mace’s statement, arguing that Mace did just what she accuses trans people of: She entered a previously male-only space “in the name of diversity and inclusion.”

“That is the exact argument trans-identifying males use to invade female spaces,” Walsh raged. “Nancy Mace was literally a beneficiary of a DEI program. It’s a ridiculous and tone deaf thing to brag about in this moment.”

“We rightly lament the death of female-only spaces. But male-only spaces died long before, thanks in part to the efforts of Nancy Mace,” he continued.

Matt Walsh is a lunatic but he is a consistent lunatic.  He is also right that if Nance wants to attack transgender people and accuse them of invading her space then she needs to stop trying to invade men's spaces and, in fact, she needs to apologize to the country for going to The Citadel and taking away a spot that could have gone to a man.

I believe in "our spaces."  I am consistent.  I believe in equality.  Matt Walsh is a lunatic who believes in exclusion but is consistent.  Nance just makes it up as she goes along and is the queen of hypocrisy.  

Hypocrisy?  Did someone say Marjorie Taylor Greene?



Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) refused to attend a Republican retreat at President Donald Trump's Doral resort in Florida and said the party should be "doing our damn job" instead.

In a statement on Tuesday, Roy blasted the lavish annual Republican policy retreat at Doral.

"If you're asking me to go spend money to go sit in a resort rather than doing our damn job in Washington with a plan that we put forward, well, you've got no plan," Roy said in a statement obtained by Fox News. "No, I'm not going to do that. I'm going to go be a husband, a father and a kid and go listen to my constituents."

"They'll find out when it comes to the day that we're voting on whether they're listening to us or not, because, look, I'm not going to back down on honoring the commitment that I made to the people that I represent to reduce the deficit, to truly secure the border," he added.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) responded by insisting "everyone should be here" at Doral.
 


Poor Marjorie.  She's a cheap date who shows up anywhere there's free booze.  She doesn't understand work -- let alone working for constituents.  Tells us again about the Jews and the space lasers, crazy Marjorie. 


"The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

Tuesday, January 28, 2025.  Unless you want the GOP to retain the White House in the 2028 election, you better be identifying the 2024 backstabbers right now.






Donald Trump referred to out MSNBC host Rachel Maddow as “the enemy of the people,” along with the networks MSNBC and CNN.

He wrote in a post to Truth Social this weekend: “Wow! Rachel Maddow has horrible ratings. She’ll be off the air very soon. MSNBC IS CLOSE TO DEATH. CNN HAS REACHED THE BOTTOM. This is a good thing. They are the Enemy of the people!” 


We started with Rachel because she's under attack. Under attack from Chump.  And from Dump.  You know her, judging by the e-mails hitting the public account, the worthless Krystal Ball.  She went on THE VANGUARD because that's where she could do her MSNBC attack.  The hosts are young kids, still feeling their way.  They're not apt to hold her to her record -- in part because they also endorsed Jill Stein.  And at one point, they were also on The Cornel West Train.  Their excuse is that they're young.  The only thing young about Krystal Ball is her husband.   So they're not going to call her on much of anything and certainly not all the damage her crap ass program does.  

"Media: How Amy Goodman harmed immigrants and helped elect Chump" is what Ava and I wrote Sunday because we realized (and were tipped off) that Amy Goodman was going to try to portray herself as the defender of immigrants this week after what went down last week.  She was going to lie to the uninformed freaks that are her fans -- check BLUESKY, you'll find them whoring and saying she has integrity -- and pretend like this was one of her big issue and 'Dig me, the elderly red from Brooklyn with my token 'co-host' of Latino descent, this is my issue and I cover it all the time.'  But she didn't cover it all the time as Ava and I noted:


It's worth noting that while Amy Goodman could only do five segments on immigration policy (again, two slamming Kamala, two saying Kamala and Chump were the same and one focusing on what Chump did in his first term), she had plenty of time for other topics during that same three month  period.


105.


That's the number of segments she did on Gaza during the same three month period, 105.  Many of those trashed Kamala.  In fact, those same three months featured at least 33 segment with Uncommitted (at least 33, many of her guest didn't disclose on air that they were part of the Uncommitted 'movement' that urged people not to vote for Kamala).  


So now Chump's been president for a week.  And the biggest issue right now?  His attacks on immigrants.  Again, in the three month lead up to the election, Amy Goodman did 105 segments on Gaza.  She only did five segments on the immigration policies of the two candidates -- four of the five slammed Kamala.  



I don't know how you can see these raids going on and not hold Amy Goodman responsible.  She's part of the reason they're taking place.  She ignored the issue on DN except to distort it four times with regards to Kamala.  Three months and it's an hour long broadcast -- although one week it expanded to two hours a day -- five days a week.

33 segments on Uncommitted.  


She failed the immigrant community.  I've never understood why but she is the least liked person on the left.  Wait, I understand that.  She's a glory hog who didn't even come up with DEMOCRACY NOW! and who sent the plethora of people who did -- some on airs -- packing to hijack the show.  Now she makes millions off it.  But what I didn't understand was why everyone was so scared to call her out?

Even Danny Schechter, when he was alive, was scared to call her out.  He called me the day he did her awful program.  He was supposed to be talking economic issues but Amy insisted that her audience was "too dumb" (her words per Danny) to understand and that they needed to talk about other things.  

I told him I'd write about it and I did.  At his own NEWSDISSECTOR blog, he wrote about it himself but didn't name her.  

And left voices I know loathe her as a person but are afraid to say so.  Ones I don't know flood the public e-mail account with horror stories and, of course, I've paid her interns for a lot of information over the years.

She has no integrity.  And she actively worked to destroy Kamala's campaign which, yes, does mean she worked to elect Donald Chump.  We can't have garbage like that hidden.  If we make it as a country to 2028, we can't risk this woman yet again tanking the Democratic Party's presidential nominee as she did last year and as she did in 2000.

So Krystal Ball got put on hold.

We may pick her up this weekend, Ava and I, for our topic.  But what I will note now as Krystal attacks MSNBC is that (a) she's a disgruntled former employee because she couldn't deliver an audience and (b) BREAKING POINTS is not a news program and it does not qualify as public affairs programming -- not even mediocre public affairs programming.  It is performative nonsense that's about as real as Friday night wrestling on basic cable.

I don't blame the kids of THE VANGUARD.  They're young and they can be foolish on the job while they learn.  

But our country can't afford Krystal Ball's nonsense.  We can't afford what she normalizes on her hideous program.

And I'm not young enough to pretend that her 'brave' moments on the program she started are in any shape or form actual acts of bravery.  She's a grifter.  When Jon Stewart rightly called out this kind of grifting and how it hurt our country, CNN cancelled CROSSFIRE.  

So let's all stop pretending that BREAKING POINTS is any shape or form informative or helpful.

And any choice that asks me to pick a Rachel or Chris or Lawrence over a Krystal Ball?  I'm going to go with any MSNBC host.  I'm not going to go with grifter and liar Krystal Ball.

Grifters like Krystal and Amy actively work to harm the Democratic Party.  I'm not spending my time online letting them get away with it.  Our country is in serious trouble right now because Chump is in the White House and those on the left and 'left' who helped put him there need to be called out and called out regularly.  They need to be exposed so that next go round, if they don't believe the nominee is sufficiently left and they do their usual stunt of attacking the Democrat with left voices (who all turn out to be Socialists even though the grifters don't mention that), people will know what's going on.

Again, no problem with Socialists or with Communists on my part.  I'm a Democrat we see issues differently from time to time and we see solutions differently from time to time.  

If we didn't, we'd all be Democrats or Socialists or Communists.  

But where I do have a problem is when a Socialist is attacking a Democrat and pretending to be a Democrat.  That's a problem.

And sadly -- check out BLUESKY -- some people are so stupid that they don't understand the difference between the three groups.  Like the self-identified 'independent' who wanted me to know that Bernie Sanders is a Democrat.  Why, he's a Democratic Socialist! -- she insisted.

He's a Socialist.  As Laura Flanders noted on air on AIR AMERICA RADIO when he got elected to the Senate, the next morning she didn't want to pick up a paper and see "independent'" Bernie Sanders elected to the Senate.  She wanted see Socialist Bernie Sanders elected to the Senate.  Because, like her, he's a Socialist. 

And she rightly knows that the truth there can break down taboos.

It's the idiots like the BLUESKY 'independent' who fall for the con games of people like Amy Goodman and Krystal Ball.  It has to stop.

Kamala was not a centrist Democrat.  But had the choice been between Chump and a centrist Democrat, I would've chosen the Centrist Democrat.  In 2023, I stated here that I would be voting for the Democrat whomever it was and I meant that.  Because Chump was and is a threat to democracy.  

I'm not trying to relitigate 2016 or any other election.  And I don't endorse in the presidential race.  Not here.  But this wasn't the usual election.  This wasn't a Dem up against Mitt Romney or John McCain or whomever.  Donald Chump, a convicted felon, was a known factor.  We knew what he'd done in his first term.  

This wasn't some roll the dice and find out.

Which is why I said here in 2023 that it would be the Democratic Party nominee that I'd be voting for regardless of who that nominee was.  I repeated that over and over in 2023 and in 2024.  

I also noted that the days of being fair were over.  I wasn't going to waste my time, as I did during previous elections, posting and writing about laughable candidates as though they were serious or had a chance.  I used to try to be so fair.  

2024 was a monumental election and those on the left who tricked and lied need to be identified so that they cant get away with it next time -- if we're lucky enough to have a next time.


Let's note Jesse Dollemore




Yes, putting Chump back in the White House doomed the Palestinians.  And that's only a surprise if you're a damn fool or a stupid idiot.  


And now we're going to back it up a moment.  The snapshots are dictated and I generally put in videos or whatever beforehand and dictate around them.  I just found out that Krystal Ball is rightly being called out by POST-LEFT WATCH so we're going to include that here now if I'm able to explain how to do it over the phone.




Okay, I'm told the Bluies (?) are in.  I'll pick back up with Krystal to also note that she tries to play the feminist card.  She's not a feminist.  Please do not buy into that 70s false media stereotype that all feminists are ugly.  They aren't.  And all ugly women aren't feminists.  Krystal's one of the uglies who is not a feminist.


And now we're way behind.  To get this up on time, I'm not dictating around the following things I had put in earlier for us to note.  We'll just call it snapshots of how Chump's immigration policies are destroying the country. 




President Trump's promise of mass deportation is now in full swing as immigration agents sweep through communities.

The White House posted pictures of men shackled before a flight to Guatemala.

"Deportation is going very well. We're getting the bad, hard criminals out. These are people that have been as bad as you get, as bad as anybody you've seen. We're taking them out first," President Trump told reporters.

[. . .]

Immigration advocates are urging people to fight fear with facts, while emphasizing the importance of knowing your rights.

"There's a lot of rights that you have regardless of immigration status in this country people need to exercise them," Heiser said.

 


It used to be that immigrants who earned U.S. citizenship could only see it taken away if they hid their Nazi past, had ties to terrorists, or lied on their application – fewer than a dozen people per year.

That changed during President Donald Trump's first administration when he led a campaign to denaturalize thousands of immigrant U.S. citizens – though it never met its goals. Last week, Trump rebooted the effort, ordering "adequate resources" be spent to denaturalize some U.S. citizens as part of his broader plan to restrict immigration.

Tucked among the priorities listed in his Day 1 executive orders was a one-line reference to enforcing a section of immigration law under which the government can revoke an immigrant's U.S. citizenship if it was "unlawfully procured."



President Donald Trump owes his re-election in part to some gains among working-class Latino voters who rolled the dice on a change in economic policy — but that change is likely to hit them worse than anyone else, wrote former Congressional Hispanic Caucus communications strategist Kristian Ramos for Salon.

The fact is, he wrote, Trump's policies will actually worsen everything that has been squeezing these voters — something he appeared wholly unconcerned with even on the campaign trail.

"The nation’s affordability crisis has uniquelyimpacted Latinos," wrote Ramos. "As reporter Jack Herrera notes, '80% of Latinos are working class. Their experience of the economy the past four years — COVID shutdowns, inflation, gas prices, housing costs — was rough. That put the incumbent Democrats at a disadvantage.'"

Trump capitalized on this, blaming inflation on the Biden administration. But in reality, under Democrats, "employment is up, wages are growing, manufacturing jobs are higher than ever, and inflation has dropped significantly" — and when you actually look at his plans, they are uniquely targeted to worsen affordability on nearly every level, Ramos continued.

For starters, he said, there are all the cuts to vital programs and services Republicans plan, including "changes to Medicare, the Affordable Care Act, and popular climate measures. These cuts alone would deeply hurt Latinos who live in climate change frontline communities and have benefited from the cost-saving energy rebates in the Clean Energy Plan. Worse yet, nine million Latinos are insured through the Affordable Care Act and 6.5 million Latinos use Medicare — roughly 10% of all enrollees." And all of this is to pay for big tax changes that will make lower-income workers pay $800 more on average while cutting taxes on the rich.

But that's just the beginning, Ramos wrote, because Trump's aggressive tariff proposals will raise the prices of goods all around the country — as will his plans for large-scale deportation of workers.


 


Selena Gomez broke down in tears on Monday morning (Jan. 27) in an Instagram post in which she promised to do anything she can to help undocumented Mexican nationals in the midst of the new Trump administration's nationwide crackdown on undocumented non-citizens.

According the People magazine, the Texas-born singer whose grandparents immigrated to the U.S. from Mexico without proper documentation posted a since-deleted Instagram Story in which she weeped alongside the caption, "I'm sorry" and a Mexican flag emoji. "All my people are getting attacked, the children," Gomez added in the video that can be seen here. "I don't understand. I'm so sorry, I wish I could do something but I can't. I don't know what to do. I'll try everything, I promise."





U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids were reportedly conducted across South Florida on Sunday as President Trump begins to make good on his promise to increase the deportation of undocumented migrants

One man exclusively told CBS News Miami his wife was taken during one of these raids.

One man, who did not want to be named, told CBS News Miami that ICE had taken his wife during one of these raids in the Miami neighborhood of Brownsville.

"It's despicable what they're doing right now," he said. "It's very embarrassing."

The man told CBS News Miami that he wanted Mr. Trump to let his wife stay in the U.S., as their 11th anniversary is on Friday.

When asked if she was in the process of getting her U.S. citizenship, the man told CBS News Miami that she was right in the middle of it. The man's wife, who's Venezuelan and has lived in the U.S. for a few years, had a court date set up and "everything was good" until that moment.





Costly, cruel, and chaotic — that’s how three immigration experts characterized the Trump administration’s new policy aimed at removing undocumented immigrants from the United States. The experts argue that the fallout is not limited to the human toll but extends to a massive economic burden: an estimated $26 billion to fund the policy, along with billions more in lost productivity across industries and sectors that rely heavily on immigrant labor.

At a Friday press conference, Nayna Gupta, policy director for the American Immigration Council, outlined the scope and implications of the executive orders signed by President Trump. “The Trump administration has claimed in recent months that it will target ‘criminal immigrants’ but what Trump’s executive orders make clear is that they are outlining immediate action to hurt all immigrants,” said Gupta, who argued that the Trump administration had taken the election as a mandate for “cruelty on immigration.”

Gupta argued that the key to halting these measures lies in members of Congress and elected officials taking a stand against the policies, which she said “are expensive and have absolutely no effect in improving this broken immigration system.” The policy director said that there will be pushback to this anti-immigration measures. “It will be up to other elected officials and organizations like us to be prepared to put forward a vision and solutions that get us to a better place because Americans want something that is effective, efficient, fair and also humane. And that is, in fact, quite doable,” said Gupta.



In Austin, people protested.  KXAN reports:

Protestors gathered at the Texas Capitol Sunday afternoon after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations were conducted in Austin. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration confirmed to NewsNation affiliate KXAN that it assisted in those operations.

Rally attendee Cheryl Flores spoke to KXAN about how the Austin ICE operations impacted her family.

“They are the epitome of the American Dream,” Flores said. “They’ve come here and worked hard. They have a right to be here just like anyone else who has fled a country that doesn’t provide the needs of the citizens.”




At least 15 Indigenous people in Arizona and New Mexico have reported being stopped at their homes and workplaces, questioned or detained by federal law enforcement and asked to produce proof of citizenship during immigration raids since Wednesday, according to Navajo Nation officials.

The reports, which have caused panic amongst tribal communities in both states, come amid the Trump administration’s attempt to ramp up undocumented immigrant arrests nationwide and amass a larger force to carry out the president’s deportation pledge. CNN has reached out to the White House for comment.

The reported raids and the exact number of Diné/Navajo and other Indigenous tribal citizens who were apprehended are still under investigation, Navajo Nation Council Speaker Crystalyne Curley told CNN. It is unclear if Immigration and Customs Enforcement or other law enforcement entities were conducting the apprehensions. ICE has not responded to CNN’s request for comment.

Navajo Nation officials have contacted the Department of Homeland Security, the governors of Arizona and New Mexico, and ICE to address the reports, the Office of Navajo President Buu Nygren said in a news release Friday.



Native Americans were in the Americas before anyone -- hence the term "Native."  And they are US citizens as Lucy Strathmore (2 PARAGRAPHS) notes:



The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, which granted U.S. citizenship to all Native Americans born within the United States, was signed into law by President Calvin Coolidge.

It was enacted partially in recognition of the estimated 12,000 Native Americans who served in the US Armed Forces during World War I and the tens of thousands of Native Americans who “supported the war at home by working in war industries, purchasing war bonds, and assisting in war relief efforts.”






At least 15 Native people in New Mexico and Arizona have reported that they’ve been stopped, questioned, or detained by federal law enforcement officials during immigration roundup efforts since Wednesday, according to Navajo Nation officials. They were asked to provide proof of citizenship despite being Indigenous to the United States.

In a news release, the Navajo Nation said its officials contacted the governors of Arizona and New Mexico, the Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to follow up on the reports.

“My office has received multiple reports from Navajo citizens that they have had negative, and sometimes traumatizing, experiences with federal agents targeting undocumented immigrants in the Southwest,” said the office of Navajo President Buu Nygren.

One Navajo woman was reportedly questioned by ICE after her workplace in Scottsdale, Arizona, was raided Wednesday morning, and was asked to show proof that she was Native, Arizona state Senator Theresa Hatathlie, who is Diné/Navajo, told CNN. The woman and seven other Indigenous people were lined up behind white vans and questioned for two hours without a way to contact their families.



The following sites updated: