Thursday, February 09, 2017

Janis Joplin

Jamie e-mails that I note the Mamas and the Papas all the time "and even the Beatles and Roberta Flack but you've never written about Janis."

Really?

I'm not calling Jamie a liar, I'm just surprised I've never written about Janis Joplin.

Yes, I like Janis' music.

I think she was an amazingly gifted vocalist.

On the box set, JANIS, you can hear an early version of her number one hit "Me & Bobby McGee."

You can listen to that and see how she worked and worked to shape that song into what it was.

I love "Call On Me."

I really noticed it in the film COMING HOME (Jane Fonda).




That's "A Woman Left Lonely."

I love her vocals on that.

In a better world, we'd have a million copycats.

But they tried to turn her life into a cautionary tale, the press, in a way, please note, that they didn't with Jim Morrison.

I think that probably scared some off.


"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Thursday, Feburary 9, 2017.  Chaos and violence continue, does anyone notice the corpses dumped in the streets, US asks for another 180 days for Mosul, Corrine Brown's aid turns on her, and much more.



Let's start with the US political scene.

       Ranking Member

Timothy Walz
Timothy Walz
Minnesota-01


US House Rep Timothy Walz is officially Ranking Member on the House Veterans Affairs Committee.

Good for him.

Good for veterans.

Bad for the inept Nancy Pelosi and the corrupt Corrine Brown (who is set to face trial on federal charges in April).




I believe we said it best about Congress' own personal Snuffleupagus (above in Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "CORRINE BROWN") in the November 19, 2014 entry "Corrine Brown is not fit to serve."

And she wasn't.

And dumb asses who don't ever attend a Congressional hearing, don't follow what laws get passed, etc, insisted that criticizing Corrine was part of a war on women.

No, it was about an incompetent member of Congress who couldn't speak the English language, couldn't get her wig on straight (not a metaphor, she had attended hearing with the wig askew and once with it on backwards) and had more rumors of corruption than she had wigs in her collection.

On the English language, let's drop back to the June 27, 2015 snapshot:

Thursday, I didn't have my Corrine-To-English translator ring on me so we'll just note a little bit of her opening remarks.


Ranking Member Corrine Brown:  The VA is facing a shortfall of 2.6 billion for veterans healthcare.  This shortfall must be address [sic] ammediately [sic].  We cannot put the health and lives of our veterans at ris [sic] by spending our time and attention pointing fingers and assigning blame.  VA will be facing an additional shortfall at the start of the next fistal [sic] year in October 




We have to stop there.

We have to.

Corrine goes on to say that the country is headed towards a government shutdown -- she uses shutdown twice.  Both times she probably would have been bleeped on TV.

She always invents her own words and here she took the "u" in "shutdown" and replaced it with an "i" both times she said it.

A government sh*tdown.

The fist time she said it, people were looking around.  Then she said, "Let me say that again, we are headed towards a government sh*tdown" and several on the Committee appeared to bite their lips to avoid laughing.

On her third time using the term, she did manage to say "shutdown."

Keep playing with the English language, Corrine, it works if you work it.


Corrine used her time to ask about fee based care and Choice.  Yes, Choice is fee based.  Many grasped that before Corinne's question but everyone grasped it after Sloane explained Choice.

Well . . .

Everyone but Corinne Brown.


After he finished describing it, she asked, "And Choice?"


A confused Sloan Gibson replied softly, "That is Choice."


Oh, Corrine Brown.



The disgrace that never stopped.

And continues to this day.

Corrine's been busy since she lost her primary last August.  She immediately set up a committee for her followers to donate to her legal fund.  She's appeared at various churches throughout Florida with her hands out trying to stick in people's pockets.

Yesterday, Steve Patterson (FLORIDA TIMES-UNION) reported:

Ronnie Simmons, former U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown’s longtime chief of staff, pleaded guilty Wednesday to a fraud conspiracy charge that strengthens the legal vise squeezing his indicted ex-boss.
Simmons, who pleaded guilty to just two of 19 charges he faced from a July indictment, also admitted to helping steal government money by creating a phantom job for an unnamed relative that cost the government about $735,000 over 15 years.

“If you plead guilty, there will be no trial of any kind,” U.S. Magistrate James Klindt told Simmons before agreeing during a Wednesday hearing to recommend a district judge accept the plea. The rest of the charges will be dismissed if the judge accepts the plea.


Anne Schindler (WTLV) adds:

If Simmons were to receive the maximum punishment for the two charges, he would face up to 30 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.
However, according to the plea deal, prosecutors are recommending a "downward adjustment" of his sentence and consideration of his "substantial cooperation." A judge is not bound by the plea deal. 
In exchange, Simmons must truthfully testify against his former boss, and anyone else involved in the case, at the request of prosecutors.
Simmons was indicted July 6, 2016 alongside Brown, who was charged with 22 related counts. She has pleaded not guilty.
Anthony Suarez, Simmons' attorney, described his decision to testify against her as "gut wrenching"  for his client. But, he said the fake charity scheme was merely a symptom of a pay-to-play political system.


ACE NEWS SERVICE explains exactly what Suarez is stating took place:

In connection with his guilty plea, Simmons admitted that, between late 2012 and early 2016, he and a co-defendant, former Congresswoman Corrine Brown, 70, of Jacksonville, Florida, participated in a fraudulent scheme involving the One Door for Education – Amy Anderson Scholarship Fund (One Door) in which the two defendants and others acting on their behalf solicited more than $800,000 in charitable donations based on false representations that the donations would be used for college scholarships and school computer drives, among other things. As part of the scheme, Simmons admitted that he and Brown solicited donations from individuals and corporate entities that Brown knew by virtue of her position in the U.S. House of Representatives, many of which the defendants led to believe that One Door was a properly registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, when, in fact, it was not.
Simmons further admitted that, contrary to his and Brown’s misrepresentations, Brown, Simmons, One Door president Carla Wiley, and others, used the vast majority of One Door donations for their personal and professional benefit, including tens of thousands of dollars in cash deposits that Simmons made to Brown’s personal bank accounts. Simmons admitted that he engaged in such cash transactions involving funds from the One Door bank account at Brown’s direction. In one instance, Simmons admitted depositing $2,100 in One Door funds into Brown’s personal bank account the same day that Brown wrote a check for a similar amount to pay taxes to the IRS. Likewise, Simmons admitted that he and Brown also used the outside consulting company of one of Brown’s employees to funnel One Door and other funds to Brown and others for their personal use. Further, Simmons acknowledged that more than $200,000 in One Door funds also were used to pay for events hosted by Brown or held in her honor, including a golf tournament in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida; lavish receptions during an annual conference in Washington, D.C.; the use of a luxury box during a Beyoncé concert in Washington, D.C.; and the use of a luxury box during an NFL game between the Washington Redskins and the Jacksonville Jaguars in the Washington, D.C. area.



Corrine stands a good chance of serving time.

And she should be behind bars.

Her disgrace is also Nancy Pelosi's disgrace.

Corrine was not fit to be Ranking Member of any Committee.

She was especially not fit to be Ranking Member of a veterans committee.

As a member of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, Corrine had 'distinguished' herself with one attack on veterans after another from 2009 to 2016.

Why did she attack them?

To defend the administration.

Take the scandal with the new veterans on the GI Bill not getting their checks.  Corrine declared it was their fault and the colleges fault.


She continued this nonsense even after then-Secretary of the VA Eric Shinseki testified to the House Veterans Affairs Committee on October 14, 2009.


I'll be frank, when I arrived, uh, there were a number of people telling me this was simply not executable. It wasn't going to happen. Three August was going to be here before we could have everything in place. Uh, to the credit of the folks in uh VA, I, uh, I consulted an outside consultant, brought in an independent view, same kind of assessment.  'Unless you do some big things here, this is not possible.'  To the credit of the folks, the good folks in VBA, they took it on and they went at it hard. We hired 530 people to do this and had to train them. We had a manual system that was computer assisted. Not very helpful but that's what they inherited. And we realized in about May that the 530 were probably a little short so we went and hired 230 more people. So in excess of 700 people were trained to use the tools that were coming together even as certificates were being executed.  Uhm, we were short on the assumption of how many people it would take. We based our numbers on the Montgomery GI Bill which is about a 15 minute procedure. The uh chapter thirty-three procedures about an hour on average, maybe an hour and 15 minutes. So right off the bat, we had some issues with assumptions. Uh, we are still receiving certificates of enrollment. This week alone, we received 36,000 certificates of enrollment coming from schools who are working through the process and we put them into the execute of providing those checks -- three checks.


Corrine never missed a moment to place the burden and the blame on the veterans in her last 8 years of Congress.  Barack Obama was president then and Corrine saw her role on the Veterans Affairs Committee as playing defense for the administration, not in assisting veterans.

Which is why veterans groups endorsed Walz for Ranking Member and not Corrine.

Tim Walz is a voice for veterans regardless of who occupies the White House.

He had proven himself on the committee repeatedly.  (For this documented in detail, see the editorial we did at THIRD "Editorial: Corrine Brown must not be named Ranking Member.")


But Nancy Pelosi wanted her friend Corrine to serve as Ranking Member.

lets be what

That's Isaiah's "Let's Be Whats!"


From the disaster of Nancy Pelosi's leadership of House Democrats to the disaster of Iraq . . .

We've repeatedly stressed: "The Islamic State and al Qaeda in Mesopotamia are not the same thing.  They have similar goals and can work together or can be at war with one another."  And from January 24th:


Xenophobia allows a White person to group the Islamic State and al Qaeda in Iraq together.

For many years, you saw this play out at the US State Dept.

But the two are not the same and were never the same.

They have some similar motives and they have some opposing motives.

Which is why the two work separately in Syria -- they also do in Iraq but a lazy (and, yes, xenophobic) press just attributes all actions in Iraq to the Islamic State.

al Qaeda in Iraq remains.  And they have been responsible for some recent bombings.

Even some that the Islamic State has taken credit for.

But that's another difference between the two groups.

An informed dialogue would benefit all.

But, sadly, we're not getting it these days.



Maybe reality is starting to sink in?

Natalie Johnson (FREE BEACON) reports:

A Sunni insurgency is taking root in Iraq as the U.S.-led coalition continues to weaken the Islamic State's territorial strongholds, particularly in Mosul, according to a new report.
The D.C.-based Institute for the Study of War warned that al Qaeda's top leadership likely will capitalize on ISIS's continued losses and attempt to gain influence within splinter militant groups opposed to the Shia-led government of Iraq.

Emily Anagnostos, the researcher who authored the report, told the Washington Free Beacon on Wednesday that the U.S.-led coalition fighting ISIS in Iraq and Syria needs to broaden its focus to target smaller Sunni insurgent groups that likely will grow as ISIS faces setbacks.

So the simple narrative may be dying at last.


If the Islamic State is focused on Mosul -- retaining it and repelling Iraqi soldiers -- exactly who's carrying out violence elsewhere?

ALUSMARIA notes a Falluja suicide bomber took their own life and the lives of 2 Iraqi soldiers with two more injured.

That's only one of many examples of violence today.

They also note that the corpse of a member of the Ministry of the Interior was discovered dumped in the streets of Baghdad (shot dead).

When the bodies are being dumped in the streets (as happened yesterday as well), it's a sign that violence is on the rise.

Sec. Gen. of Hezbollah party in Basra Basim al Musawi assassinated late last night in a drive by shooting in Basra province south .
 
 




MIDDLE EASTERN MONITOR notes:

A senior leader within the Iran-backed Iraqi Hezbollah militant group was assassinated last night in the southern Shia-dominated city of Basra according to local police sources and social media activists.
“Bassem Al-Moussawi, secretary-general of [Iraq’s] Hezbollah, was killed late yesterday when unidentified assailants opened fire on his car in Basra province’s Al-Hayyaniya district,” the Basra police force spokesman, Major Jumaa Al-Hamrani, told Turkish state-run Anadolu.
An associate of Al-Mousawi was injured in the attack, after which the gunmen managed to flee the scene, Al-Hamrani said.

No group has yet has claimed responsibility for the assassination. However, Basra is completely under the control of several Shia militant organisations, each vying for a greater share of power and influence at the expense of one another. The assassination could therefore be one militia attacking another.



Turning to the issue of protests.  Yesterday's snapshot noted the protest taking place in Baghdad and wondered if the western press would cover it (having ignored the protest last Friday already)?

Not a word from AP, REUTERS, THE NEW YORK TIMES, etc, etc.


Qatar's PENINSULA has a report which opens:

Thousands of supporters of firebrand Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr staged protests in Baghdad on Wednesday to demand the dissolution of Iraq’s High Electoral Commission. 
"The electoral commission in its current form is unviable," protestor Murad al-Yaseri told Anadolu Agency. 
"It is beholden to political parties," he added. "It is incapable of overseeing impartial elections."

Protestors gathered outside the capital’s heavily fortified Green Zone, demanding the establishment of a new electoral commission "untainted by political affiliations". 


MIDDLE EAST MONITOR carries the same report.


If the United States paid attention to what Iraqis protest, maybe, just maybe the US government wouldn't be dropping bombs on Iraq daily and US troops wouldn't be needed on the ground in Iraq?


Sadr has called for a million man demonstration to be held of Saturday Feb 11th in . The location will be a ''Surprise''.
 
 
 


Meanwhile, it's day 115 of The Mosul Slog.


Betty's "Give them 180 more days for Mosul" takes on the assertion of U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend that "within the next six months I think we’ll see both (the Mosul and Raqqa campaigns) conclude."

And now they're saying in 180 more days, the city may be liberated.

The people of Mosul suffer.

Their government doesn't care.

Hayder al-Abadi becomes prime minster in August of 2014.

The Islamic States took Mosul two months before in June of 2014.

He's made prime minister in August of 2014 and he waits until October of 2016 to try to liberate the city from the terrorist group.

Talk about a worthless and unresponsive government.

The failure to liberate Mosul is a stark testament to how ineffective the Iraqi government currently is.



The following community sites -- plus PACIFICA EVENING NEWS -- updated:



  •   




  •  
     

    Wednesday, February 08, 2017

    The hideous POWERLESS (plus David Lindorff on journalists)

    "TV: Funny and unfunny" (Ava and C.I., THE THIRD ESTATE SUNDAY REVIEW):
    While CBS has something to be proud of, NBC should hang its head in shame over POWERLESS.

    This sitcom is a stain on Thursday nights.




    RON: I wished we worked for Batman.  I feel like he would really get us.

    EMILY: Well maybe someday we will.

    VOICE OVER: Heh.  That's funny.


    No, it's really not.

    That's not the fault of Ron Funches (Ron) or Vanessa Hudgens (Emily) or any of the cast.

    With the exception of Alan Tudyk, the cast does a great job.

    But the writing's not there.

    Will it ever be?

    Could it be?

    Comedies don't tend to do well in America when they revolve around superheroes.

    More recently, the 2006 film MY SUPER EX-GIRLFRIEND struggled to find an audience.

    THE CW makes every night about superheroes.  Monday it's SUPERGIRL (transplanted from CBS).  Tuesday's FLASH.  Wednesday is ARROW.  Thursday it's LEGENDS OF TOMORROW.  All of that plus ABC's MARVEL AGENTS OF SHIELD.

    That's before you even consider the non-stop superhero films.

    Was a comedy really needed?

    POWERLESS fails to make a convincing argument.

    It features all the laughs of an episode of FELICITY -- which is to say very few -- while managing to feel twice as long.



    That show is hideous, POWERLESS.

    It's so bad, you have to watch it to believe it.

    Only 3.2 million people watched.

    It should be cancelled but only 3.9 million watched the show before it, SUPERSTORE.

    SUPERSTORE's rarely funny either.

    But it's not as awful as POWERLESS.

    POWERLESS just might be the worst show of the season.

    It's a point Stan raised in "Worst show of this season?"

    I think he's right.

    Meanwhile, Dave Lindorff (COUNTERPUNCH) notes that Russia isn't the only country where journalists are dying:


    More recently, of course, there is the bizarre death of Michael Hastings, a reporter for BuzzFeed andRolling Stone who was killed in a high-speed crash of his new Mercedes C250 coup, which had reportedly been observed driving an estimated 100 mph done a local Los Angeles street in the middle of the night in 2013 before veering off into a palm tree and exploding into flame. Hastings had reportedly been working on an article on the Democratic party, the NSA and the CIA at the time of his death, and had told associates he needed to “get off the radar for a bit” because federal agents were interviewing his associates. His death followed his publication in 2010 in Rolling Stone of a lengthy article on the top commander in Afghanistan, Gen. William McCrystal, whose on-the-record criticisms to him of President Obama led to the general’s resignation. McCrystal had earlier led the US military’s assassination program in Iraq, which like the CIA’s notorious Phoenix Program of assassinations of Viet Cong leaders had attempted to kill off the leaders of Iraq’s Sunni counterintersurgency.  Around the time of Hasting’s death it became known that such new cars as his Mercedes were vulnerable to hacking which would allow someone with a computer to wrest full control of all functions of a car — the accelerator, the steering and the breaks — from the driver and to cause crashes like the one that killed Hastings. The secretive manner in which Hastings’ body was handled by the county coroner, and the way his car was removed by police under a white shrink wrap, has only deepened suspicions about the real cause of his death.
    Consider too the strange murder of Seth Rich, the 27-year-old Democratic National Committee computer worker who Wikileaks has suggested was the source of leaked DNC emails late in last year’s election campaign — leaks which many believe contributed to Hillary Clinton’s defeat on Nov. 8 by Donald Trump. Rich was shot twice in the back while walking home at night in Washington, DC on July 10, 2016 in what local police quickly termed a “botched robbery,” though his killer reportedly made no attempt to take a watch, phone or wallet. Wikileaks, which released the emails, has offered a $25,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Rich’s killer.

    While, as in the case of Russian killings of journalists, links to leaders are purely speculative in cases of journalist killings in the US, the same kinds of inferences often made about Putin’s possible role are all too easy to make about leaders roles when it comes to the murder of journalists and their sources here in the US, too.
    3.9
    3.2
    "Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
    Wednesday, February 8, 2017.  Chaos and violence continue, Moqtada al-Sadr may be seeking a political alliance, protests in Baghdad and much more



    As the western press continues to ignore events on the ground in Iraq, maybe it's time to update Tracy Chapman's "Behind The Wall"  to "the press always comes late, if they come at all"?


    So far this morning, no western media  reports on the gathering protest in Baghdad.


    A Massive protest will take place today in 3 PM near the Greenzone by Sadr supporters demanding new Elections Commission.
     
     



    security forces have closed double bridge and roads as protesters gather near it. Security is on high alert.
     
     



    No coincidence, Iraq's prime minister, Hayder al-Abadi, held a press conference today.  ALSUMARIA reports he called on the Parliament to immediately begin forming an electoral commission.  Get the connection?


    Saturday, we noted:



    Hundreds of Iraqis did useful things yesterday inclu
    NINA reportsding the hundred who rallied in Baghdad's Tahrir Square.  ALSUMARIA reports they rallied to call for reforms in the government (corruption) and reforms in the election law and the Independent High Electoral Commission.  ALSUMARIA reports hundred also protested in Karbala with the same demands.

    The western media has been ignoring the protests.


    Is this the day they finally discover them?

    And if they do, will anything happen?







    NINA reports that MP Magda al-Tamimi is calling for the members of the electoral commission to appear before Parliament for questioning due to a number of reasons including the large amounts of complaints about alleged corruption she has been receiving about them.


    Due to the protest, ALSUMARIA reports, the Election Commission has closed shop and gone home for the day to avoid "friction" with the protesters.

    And ALSUMARIA is reporting that the protest has started with thousands turning out to demand changes in the electoral commission and in the voting law.

    Sadrist respond to link the demonstrations on the anniversary of the Baath coup




    ALL IRAQ NEWS carries the above photo in their report on today's protest in Baghdad.


    And, in what may be shocking news for some, a new political alliance is being reported.

    ALL IRAQ NEWS carries the story that Moqtada al-Sadr is discussing teaming with Ayaad al-Allawi for a political slate in the upcoming elections.

    Moqtada is one of the most powerful Shi'ite politicians.  His only real challenger to the title is probably Ammar al-Hakim.

    Ayaad al-Alawi is a Shi'ite as well.

    He proved his political strength in the 2010 election when he devised an integrated political slate, Iraqiya, which won the 2010 elections and which would have led to Ayaad being prime minister were it not for then-US President Barack Obama overturning the election results with The Erbil Agreement.
    (For those keeping track, when the US government interfered with that election, Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.)

    A teaming of Moqtada and Allawi is not all the strange.

    Nouri al-Maliki sees both as political enemies.  (Nouri was prime minister from 2006 through 2014 and wants to be prime minister again.)

    And the two were part of a coalition attempting to get a no confidence vote against Nouri in 2011.  (Then-US Vice President Joe Biden pressured then-Iraqi President Jalal Talabani to stop the process.)


    If they do form a political slate, it would not be surprising if they attempted to bring in Ammar and others they had worked with in 2011 as well.


    Turning to violence, the US Defense Dept announced this morning:


    Strikes in Iraq
    Attack, fighter, and remotely piloted aircraft and ground-based artillery conducted 12 strikes consisting of 51 engagements in Iraq, coordinated with and in support of the Iraqi government:
    -- Near Rutbah, a strike destroyed a vehicle-borne bomb.
    -- Near Kirkuk, a strike engaged an ISIL tactical unit.
    -- Near Mosul, nine strikes engaged six ISIL tactical units and two ISIL staging areas; destroyed 12 watercraft, eight cranes, seven engineering equipment pieces, five vehicles, four supply caches, two tunnels, two mortar systems, a front-end loader, a weapons cache, a fighting position, a tactical vehicle, a weapons facility and a vehicle-borne-bomb facility; and damaged nine supply routes.
    -- Near Qayyarah, a strike damaged four supply routes.

    Task force officials define a strike as one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative, effect. Therefore, officials explained, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against buildings, vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making those targets harder or impossible for ISIL to use. Accordingly, officials said, they do not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. Ground-based artillery fired in counterfire or in fire support to maneuver roles is not classified as a strike.



    Meanwhile, it's day 114 of The Mosul Slog.


    The Defense Dept published an article yesterday which includes:

    "At this point, ISIL fighters are stuck in Mosul," the Defense Department's director of press operations, Navy Capt. Jeff Davis, told reporters.
    With Iraqi forces closing in and bridge access to eastern Mosul severed, the terrorists in the western quadrant are unable to resupply and reinforce, he said.

    "The fighters who remain in west Mosul face a choice between surrendering or annihilation, as there's not a place to retreat," Davis said.



    Strange, though.

    Violence is in place besides west Mosul.


    3 corpses were discovered in the streets of Kirkuk yesterday.  2 were found dumped in the streets of Baghdad today.



    Also today, a police commissioner was shot dead in front of his east Kirkuk home. a home implosion in Falluja has left 1 person dead and two more injured (the home was booby trapped),  and 2 members of the Iraqi military were killed in a western Anbar bombing.

    Meanwhile Alsumaria reports that the head of security for Ammar al-Hakim, head of the Islamic Supreme Council in Iraq, has filed charges against MP Adel Nouri over an incident Monday between Baghdad and the Green Zone when they say Adel Nouri's car charged at the convoy Ammar was traveling in.  They are insisting it was an assassination attempt.





    The following community sites -- plus BLACK AGENDA REPORT and PACIFICA EVENING NEWS -- updated:













  • iraq

    Tuesday, February 07, 2017

    Rosa Brooks whines again

    Oh my, this former Defense Dept. official was subjected to obscenity on the internet: some in all caps! The horror.


    The writer is Rosa Brooks.

    I can't stand her.

    She is a liar who pretends to be of the people.

    But no sooner did she join Barack Obama's White House then she was calling for the government to license journalists.

    Grasp that.



    "Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
    Tuesday, February 7, 2017.   Chaos and violence continue as a western media blackout ignores protests in Iraq as well as international law.

    The media failure never ends.

    Link to headline article



    What is the purpose of this trash?

    It's supposed to be journalism.

    But it fails at every test.

    Michael Gregory seems unaware that when 'reporting' for REUTERS it is his job to provide context.

    If it's just a non-stop feed, it's not reporting.

    The so-called Iraqi forces are yet again breaking the law but you'd never know that to read Michael Gregory's so-called report.

    They are leaving the bodies of members of the Islamic State in the streets -- so dogs will eat the corpses, one helpfully explains.


    In the long and useless article, Gregory finds time for this, "But a man who approached said the bodies should be buried because that is everyone's right."

    And that's the closest to context Gregory ever gets.

    It is everyone's right.

    It is also -- a point Gregory fails to inform the readers -- the law.

    From the International Committee of the Red Cross and Red Crescent:



    Rule 115. Disposal of the Dead
    Rule 115. The dead must be disposed of in a respectful manner and their graves respected and properly maintained.
    Summary
    State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts.
    International armed conflicts
    The obligation to dispose of the dead respectfully was first codified in the 1929 Geneva Conventions.[1]  It is now dealt with in detail in the 1949 Geneva Conventions.[2] Many military manuals specify that the dead must be disposed of decently.[3]  This obligation is set forth in the legislation of most, if not all, States.[4]  It was upheld in 2002 by Israel’s High Court in the Jenin (Mortal Remains) case.[5] The above-mentioned treaty provisions also require that graves be respected and properly maintained. Additional Protocol I adds that the parties must conclude agreements to protect and maintain gravesites permanently.[6]  The requirement to respect and maintain gravesites is also laid down in numerous military manuals.[7] 
    Non-international armed conflicts
    The obligation to dispose of the dead decently in non-international armed conflicts is set forth in Additional Protocol II.[8]  In addition, this rule is contained in other instruments pertaining also to non-international armed conflicts.[9] A number of military manuals which are applicable in or have been applied in non-international armed conflicts specify that the dead must be disposed of decently.[10]  The legislation of most, if not all, States requires respect for this rule.[11]  It may be said that this rule reflects a general principle of law requiring respect for the dead and their graves.No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. A reported case of the disrespectful disposal of dead civilians in Papua New Guinea was condemned by the UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions.[12] 
    It is also likely that further detailed rules supporting the requirement of decent disposal of the dead and respect and proper maintenance of their gravesites are contained in domestic legislation.
    Interpretation
    The Geneva Conventions specify that the dead must be buried, if possible, according to the rites of the religion to which they belonged and that they may only be cremated in exceptional circumstances, namely because of imperative reasons of hygiene, on account of the religion of the deceased or in accordance with the express wish of the deceased.[13]  The Geneva Conventions furthermore require that, in principle, burial should be in individual graves. Collective graves may only be used when circumstances do not permit the use of individual graves or, in case of burial of prisoners of war or civilian internees, because unavoidable circumstances require the use of collective graves.[14]  Lastly, the Geneva Conventions require that graves be grouped according to nationality if possible.[15]  These requirements are also set forth in numerous military manuals.[16] It is likely that some of these requirements also apply in non-international armed conflicts on the basis of national law. In 1995, for example, Colombia’s Council of State held that the deceased must be buried individually subject to all the requirements of the law, and not in mass graves.[17] 



    It is a violation of the law.

    In all the rah rah quotes (see the article) about how wonderful leaving bodies in the streets as a lesson is, Gregory never notes the law.

    His job is to provide context.

    The law is context.

    When people complain that they were treated unfairly under the law, they are complaining because laws exist so that we ideally are all treated uniformly.  Mob mentality is not the law.  Vengeance is not the law.

    What is taking place in Mosul right now is not the law.

    It is yet another violation of the law.

    And it shames not only the Iraqi military but the government that has allowed these travesties to take place.

    The government of Iraq was put in place by an occupying power (the United States government).

    It has failed to represent the Iraqi people which is why the Islamic State was able to get a hold in Iraq to begin with.

    Now it fails to follow even the most basic recognized international laws.

    And for Michael Gregory and REUTERS, that's not a story.

    For them, a 'report' is a bunch of quotes about how great this is with one person quoted saying it's not right.

    That's 'balance,' 'perspective' and 'context' to them?

    This so-called report is hideous and doesn't meet the basics of journalism.

    Again, they had a story: The violation of the laws, the disrespect of the dead.

    But they didn't report that story -- they didn't report anything.

    Michael Gregory's done the equivalent of grabbing quotes from a chat board, piecing them together with no context and calling it 'reporting.'

    He should be ashamed.

    And people should be calling out Iraqi prime minister Hayder al-Abadi.

    This is a huge violation of international law.

    If he's going to get away without any rebuke for this, understand what comes next.

    Both Bully Boy Bush and Barack Obama played footsie with paranoid Nouri al-Maliki.

    They fed his paranoia.

    And his actions resulted in the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq.

    Hayder al-Abadi is the head of state.

    Iraq is publicly in violation of the law.

    Hayder deserves to be called out and rebuked for that.

    Instead, it's day 113 of The Mosol Slog and few are even aware of it judging by the lack of media coverage.


    Mosul was seized by the Islamic State in June of 2014.

    113 days ago, Hayder al-Abadi finally launched an operation to liberate or 'liberate' it.

    113 days and counting.


    If this was what 'planning' brought about, the world should fear what will take place in a post-Islamic State Iraq.

    Sweden's Ambassador to the United Nations, Olof Skoog, tells RUDAW:

    With the United Nations presence in Iraq, as the liberation goes forward, what comes next? And I think the United Nations Special Representative [to Iraq] has made a very strong appeal to all of us, not just countries that are on the security council, but the whole membership of the United Nations to come up now to sustain its effort to Iraq and to the people and the government to ensure that the next phases now of preparing for elections, reconstruction, in where there has been where there was destruction, helping to get the economy back on track, etc., so that this effort is sustained. But of course in the end, these things will only work if it’s led by the Iraqi people, themselves. But we are certainly there to back it up to keep on supporting Iraq.


    Will the government become of and by the people in Iraq?

    Hasn't so far.

    Saturday, we noted:



    Hundreds of Iraqis did useful things yesterday including the hundred who rallied in Baghdad's Tahrir Square.  ALSUMARIA reports they rallied to call for reforms in the government (corruption) and reforms in the election law and the Independent High Electoral Commission.  ALSUMARIA reports hundred also protested in Karbala with the same demands.



    Though ignored by western media, those protests were called by Shi'ite cleric and movement leader Moqtada al-Sadr.

    ANADOLU AGENCY reports today:

    Firebrand Iraqi Shia cleric and politician Muqtada al-Sadr has called on followers to stage mass demonstrations in Baghdad on Wednesday to demand reform of Iraq's official electoral commission.

    "We demand reform of the electoral commission, both in terms of its membership and its bylaws," read a statement issued by a committee tasked with organizing Sadrist rallies.

    Wednesday's protest will be considered a "first step", the statement added, warning that "escalatory steps" would be taken if demonstrators' demands were not met.





    Winding down, we'll note that Kurt Eichenwald takes a brief break from crusing the young males on Cedar Springs (don't worry, he understands) to Tweet this nonsense.

    A reporter I worked with died in Iraq trying to bring news to America. And Donald "Heel Spurs" Trump claims we try and hide terror news.





    Why is this kiddie porn fan allowed to be at NEWSWEEK or any periodical.

    THE NEW YORK TIMES fired him for lying.

    Yes.

    But among the lies that worried them was his story that makes no sense about being 'helpful' by giving the kiddie porn performer money (thousands of which he lied to NYT about).

    He did not come across the kiddie porn while pursuing a story -- by his own admission -- and he did not plan to write a story -- by his own admission -- when he was forking over thousands to the young male.

    He was unethical, absolutely.

    But also alarming to the paper was his frequenting kiddie porn sites to begin with and doing so -- by his own admission -- when he wasn't even planning to write about the topic.

    We shouldn't take people like him seriously.

    But let's consider what the kiddie porn lover is saying: Donald Trump can't criticize the press because Kurt had a friend (shocking!) who died reporting in Iraq.

    That is beyond insane.

    Many people lied in Iraq in their reporting -- many continue to do so.

    Many reported stories that did not pan out.

    A loss of a friend is a sad thing.

    Probably even sadder for Kurt since he's never had many.

    But it doesn't mean that the press can't be called out.

    And, by the way, not mentioning the name of the friend?

    Yes, when you're a serial liar like Kurt that will cause many to wonder if the person ever existed.

    But that's not my point.

    The only thing larger than Kurt's waist is his ego.

    How vain do you have to be to Tweet what he did without naming the dead?

    Pretty damn vain.

    Go back to your kiddie porn, Kurt, adults are talking.


    The following community sites -- plus BLACK AGENDA REPORT, PACIFICA EVENING NEWS and Tavis Smiley -- updated:


  • Idiots
    13 hours ago






  • iraq