Wednesday, May 06, 2026

Drama Queen Lindsey Graham

Lindsey Graham, the embarrassment that occupies space in the Senate.   Leigh Kimmins (DAILY BEAST) reports


Bloodthirsty MAGA hawk Lindsey Graham has abruptly changed his tune on the Iran war.

The South Carolina senator has been one of the biggest cheerleaders for Donald Trump’s Operation Epic Fury and even claimed credit for nudging the president into it.

But he can’t seem to make up his mind about what should happen to Kharg Island, which is Iran’s primary oil export hub, handling approximately 90 percent of its crude exports and functioning as a critical economic lifeline.
As the war dragged on and Trump sought an off-ramp, Graham went on Fox News to suggest seizing the strategically important island.

“Here’s what I’d tell President Trump,” Graham said on March 22. “Keep it up for a few more weeks. Take Kharg Island, where all of the resources they have to produce oil. Control that island. Let this regime die on a vine.”

Now, just weeks later, he has totally contradicted himself. “I’m not a real advocate of taking Kharg Island,” he said on Sean Hannity’s eponymous show on Monday evening.

Lindsey is just a drama queen who changes his view point constantly.  He's become such a joke since John McCain passed.   He's just turned himself into a prostitute for Chump.  He has no courage, he has no ethics.  He's just someone who gives it up for Chump.  


Some comments on the article:


Chris Fosnacht
11 minutes ago
All reports have been that he was a major factor in the decision for us to attack Iran.  He doesn't get to back into the shrubs on this.  He owns it and the devastating effects on the entire world's economy.  He should get wrecked in the election if his constituents actually believe in holding people accountable for their actions.  They can see his effect on their lives every time they fill their tanks.

Profile Picture
David zinger
13 minutes ago
1. Bloodthirsty MAGA senator retreats from his own war plan
2. The U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is running for re-election to a fifth term in 2026. He filed for re-election in March 2026 and is facing both Republican and Democratic challengers in the June 9, 2026, primary.
3. They say Lindsey Graham is a MAGA Republican, could be southern evangelical who believes Trump is Jesus, is and has been Trump minion, desperate to win the primaries in 2026, but could lose the primaries to his challengers. Now that the majority of the Americans don' support Trump's Iran war. Lindsey has changed his tune and is a moron and sucks.


Bruce Vaudt
3 hours ago
"Victory to me would be regaining freedom of navigation of the Strait of Hormuz,"
So, victory would mean putting things back to where they were before the US/Israeli attacks?
Is this really the best that South Carolina has to offer?


J g
3 hours ago
So glad he is willing to sacrifice the lives of our military in this unnecessary war.
Not one senator, congressman or cabinet member that supports this war has a single child serving in our armed forces.

David Lauer
3 hours ago
Look at his eyes.  Dementia eyes.  Lights on, but nobody's home.  Just like his keeper, DJT.  When Americans finally awaken and realize the sleazebags they voted for, there will be a huge revolt.  His re-election speaks volumes about the caliber of people in SC.

Barry Wood
1 hour ago
Politicians, especially Republicans are always so brave to openly risk the lives of other people's children. I doubt that anyone will ever see a Trump in a military uniform, unless it's on Halloween night...


Lindsey Graham should be leaving the Senate this election cycle.  He's done nothing to justify his remaining in the Senate. 

"The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS): 

Tuesday, May 5, 2025.  The American people overwhelmingly say the country is headed in the wrong direction and that Chump is too weak for the job, Todd Blanche continues to speak nonsense, the Iran War continues to drag on, and much more. 



This morning on MEIDASTOUCH NEWS,  Ben gives a rundown on the ongoing war on Iran. 







A top Iranian official warned on Tuesday of an escalation in the Strait of Hormuz and accused the United States of violating the fragile cease-fire, a day after the U.S. Navy began an initiative to escort commercial ships through the strait, a vital oil shipping waterway.

As the truce appeared to falter, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s top negotiator in the stumbling peace negotiations, said in a social media post that “a new equation” was emerging in the waterway. He said that American actions had endangered shipping through the strait, which Iran has effectively blockaded since the war began in late February.

“We know well that the continuation of the current situation is unbearable for the United States, while we have not even started yet,” Mr. Ghalibaf said.

The U.S. Navy began escorting commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz on Monday. The U.S. Central Command said that two commercial ships operating under the American flag had passed through the waterway. Maersk, the Danish shipping giant, said that one of its vessels, a carrier transporting vehicles that was flying the U.S. maritime flag, had passed through the strait.

But reports of attacks from Iran in and around the Persian Gulf quickly tested the American actions and the Pakistani-brokered cease-fire that paused the war last month.


Chump makes one inane remark after another.  Erica L. Green and Zolan Kanno-Youngs (NEW YORK TIMES) note his lies regarding the domestic impact of his war of choice:

Facing pressure to address the economic fallout of his war in Iran, President Trump on Monday sought to portray his policy wins for small businesses as evidence that he was succeeding in building up the economy.

Speaking to business leaders from across the country at an event in the East Room of the White House, Mr. Trump declared that slashing taxes and regulations had yielded “record business,” and that the economy was “roaring.” The White House described the Small Business Week event as highlighting “the extraordinary revival of Main Street under his America First agenda.”

But looming over it all was a war abroad that Mr. Trump had begun, and whose economic impact is compounding cost-of-living concerns among Americans, many of whom increasingly say their economic reality has worsened under his tenure.

Mr. Trump’s comments on Monday created a sharp contrast with the economic reality outside Washington, as rising energy prices hammer families and businesses alike.


This comes as Americans look at him and judge him to be unfit to serve as president.  Ashleigh Fields (THE HILL) reports:


A new poll found that most Americans say they believe President Trump is mentally and physically unfit to serve as commander in chief. 

The Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll found that 59 percent of U.S. respondents said that Trump does not have the mental sharpness it takes to lead the country. Forty percent of respondents said the president is mentally equipped for leadership, and 1 percent of participants skipped the question. 
Comparatively, 55 percent of U.S. adults said Trump is not in good enough physical health to serve as president, while 44 percent disagreed and 1 percent of survey participants skipped the question. 

59%.  That is what you could call a landslide.  59% of Americans believe "Trump does not have the mental sharpness it takes to lead the country."  

And he doesn't.

But 59% of the American people are no longer willing to bite their tongues.  They've seen Chump and his lies and they've watched him destroy the economy.  They see him claim that he doesn't need Congressional approval to continue his war on Iran even through he does need it.  

They've grown used to the fact that he lies and then he lies some more.  

That is how he plays it. 



RealClearPolitics’ average of polls shows 61 percent of Americans believe the country is on the “wrong track” as of April 28, marking the first time public sentiment has reached that level during Trump’s second term. Some 61.6 percent of Americans thought the county was heading in the wrong direction on January 18, 2025, two days before Trump was inaugurated for a second term, according to RealClearPolitics’ average.

It comes as polls have shown the president’s approval rating has dropped in recent months, and that his rating on handling of all major issues including the economy remain underwater amid high grocery and gas prices due to the Iran war.



61% believe the country is on the wrong track.

61%.

Again, a clear majority of Americans.






In related news, AP reports:

The Pentagon announced last week that it would pull some 5,000 troops out of Germany, but Trump told reporters on Saturday that “we’re going to cut way down. And we’re cutting a lot further than 5,000.”

He offered no reason for the move, which blindsided NATO, but his decision came amid an escalating dispute with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz over the U.S-Israeli war on Iran, and Trump’s anger that European allies have been reluctant to get involved in the conflict in the Middle East.


Sam Levine (GUARDIAN) reports:


Donald Trump has threatened to withdraw more US troops from Germany after stunning European leaders and some senior members of his own party by last week announcing the withdrawal of 5,000 soldiers from Germany.

The move left 30,000 US troops still in the country, according to CNN. But Trump threatened on Saturday that more cuts were coming. “We are going to cut way down, and we’re cutting a lot further than 5,000,” he told reporters on Saturday.

[. . .]

The Republicans who chair the armed services committees in Congress, Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi and Representative Mike Rogers of Alabama, released a joint statement on Saturday saying they were “very concerned” by the possibility of reducing troops in Germany.


Republicans and Democrats in Congress are speaking out on the move.  For example, Ashleigh Fields (THE HILL) adds:


Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.) on Sunday criticized the Trump administration’s decision to withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany following a public spat with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 

Last week, the German chancellor said that Washington was being “humiliated” by Iran amid the closure of the Strait of Hormuz in remarks condemned by President Trump

Crow said, “It appears as though this decision was made because Donald Trump was upset by a comment made by the German chancellor, like he is getting emotional and angry about this, and he’s making really consequential troop decision — troop movement decisions based upon being upset by the comments of a foreign leader, which is no way to run a foreign policy,” during an appearance on CBS News’s “Face the Nation.”

“So, we’re looking into it, and we’re going to make sure that any movements, if they do occur, are actually in our interests,” the House Democrat added. 





 

This is the start of a presidential tantrum, not the end of one: Trump told reporters late Friday that he intends to cut U.S. troop deployments in Germany “a lot further” than 5,000. Hours earlier, a reporter asked whether he was considering pulling U.S. troops out of Spain and Italy, too, since its leaders also recently hurt Trump’s feelings. “Yeah, probably,” he replied. “Why shouldn’t I?”

The Pentagon reportedly didn’t see this coming: Politico reported last week that Trump’s threats, preceding Friday’s announcement, “stunned defense officials.”

The Putin angle: The same Politico report noted that Trump’s initial threat “came hours after he spoke by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has long sought to reduce the number of NATO troops in Europe.” The American president has been going to scandalous lengths to please Moscow, and the decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Germany belongs on the same list.

The pushback on Capitol Hill has been relatively bipartisan: While Democratic officials were quick to condemn the administration’s move, they weren’t alone, as some congressional Republicans agreed that the redeployments are a mistake.

This won’t help our geopolitical interests: In an opinion piece for The New York Times, Linas Kojala, the chief executive of the Geopolitics and Security Studies Center in Lithuania, argued persuasively that Trump’s move “risks weakening one of America’s best strategic investments: a military presence that deters Russia and keeps Europe’s old rivalries from becoming America’s problem again.”


As Rachel Maddow noted last night on MS NOW, the US troops he's removing from Germany?



 Rachel Maddow:  Where do you think they sent the US troops who had to be evacuated really quickly off of all those undefended bases all over the Middle East?  Where'd they send them?  They sent them to Germany because we have a really big troop presence in Germany and lots of facilities for our troops in Germany.  There have been hundreds of US troops wounded in Trump's Iran War so far. Where do US troops get evacuated to when they're wounded in the Middle East?  They get evacuated to Germany because we have such a big troops presence there and lots of military facilities there to handle those things.  Trump is now sending 5,000 American troops home from that crucial position.


As Americans suspect, he has no idea what he's doing.  Take the battleships he wants built.  Alex Henderson reports:



In December 2025, President Donald Trump announced that a World War 2-era battleship would be back in use. But defense technology has changed considerably since that war, which ended 81 years ago in 1945. And according to analysis from the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, the "Trump-class battleship" doesn't meet the needs of 21st Century defense and warfare and is absolute technologically.
Fortune's Jake Angelo, in an article published on May 3, explains, "Here's the issue: the U.S. Navy hasn't operated a battleship since the last Iowa-class vessel was retired in 1992 — a type of vessel which hasn't even been constructed since the mid-20th Century. The Trump-class battleship, which the Department of Defense is requesting upwards of $1 billion to build, will inherently be stuck in WW2, and would be rendered helpless against modern-day weapons. In fact, despite the billion-dollar price tag, Cato puts the true cost at $20 billion apiece, and it still won't be able to subvert modern-day, advanced anti-ship missiles."





Turning to acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, 



Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche made an appearance on "Meet the Press" on Sunday, where he was forced to admit that the term "8647" wasn't worth indicting someone over.

Since the arrest of former FBI Director James Comey, clothing bearing the message "86-47" has appeared all over Etsy and Amazon. During the show, host Kristen Welker pulled up the search on Amazon for such clothing and asked Blanche whether everyday Americans should expect a visit from the FBI and Secret Service for wearing such a shirt or for posting the numbers anywhere online.
Blanche was clear, no one is being targeted over "86-47" unless there is a reason to believe they are specifically threatening the president.

“This is not just about a single Instagram post,” Blanche said. “This is about a body of evidence that [prosecutors] collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury.”

CNN legal analyst and former prosecutor Elie Honig explained that the filing from the Justice Department makes it clear that it's only about the Instagram photo that Comey posted.

"If you look at the indictment, if you look at the statute that DOJ has chosen to charge here, if you look at the wording of the indictment, it's quite clear that Jim Comey's Instagram post with the seashells, that is the case. And the case is that post. So I'm skeptical," said Honig.

The legal expert doesn't think that the DOJ will find much that would materially change the meaning of the phrase "86-47" to be more threatening than what Comey posted and said.
Former prosecutor and ex-law school professor Glenn Kirschner explained that the comments dealt a blow to the Justice Department's case.

Blanche's press conference made it clear that the photo was part of a larger case involving "threatening the life of the president."

After showing the clip of Blanche promising that every post of "8647" "does not result in indictments," Kirschner asked, "Really? Todd?"

"He just admitted that there are countless, maybe thousands, tens of thousands of people posting, saying, wearing t-shirts that display that very same thing, and what did he say? 'No! They're not prosecuted for that!'" recalled Kirschner. "Why? Well, they're not Donald Trump's perceived enemies, are they?"




During his latest appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Donald Trump’s former defense lawyer, who’s launched an unsubtle campaign to persuade the president to nominate him as former Attorney General Pam Bondi’s successor, argued that people should stop talking about Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices gutting the Voting Rights Act and start instead talking about voter ID.

“Every time you walk into a restaurant or a club, you have to show your ID,” the acting attorney general told host Kristen Welker. “How about you have to show your ID to vote? That’s not anything that’s crazy, and that’s what we should be talking about.”

So, a few things.

First, treating the gutting of the Voting Rights Act as an inconvenience to be overlooked is ridiculous.

Second, I’ve been to plenty of restaurants, and I’ve never even heard of one that requires patrons to show identification at the door.

Third, the right to dine out is in no way comparable to the right to vote, as the acting attorney general really ought to understand.

But as important as these elements are, they’re not unfolding in a vacuum. Blanche is in the midst of an unannounced audition, which he’s trying nail through a series of unsubtle moves that include indicting people the president doesn’t like, advocating firing squads as a method of federal execution, releasing absurd reports critical of the Biden administration while gratuitously slamming Joe Biden himself, and intervening in support of Trump’s ballroom crusade.

So while the Republican lawyer’s “ID at restaurants” line was laughable, it wasn’t intended to persuade the public; it was intended to impress the president watching to see whether Blanche would embarrass himself in support of Trump’s agenda.


Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

The Fair Trusts for Fiscal Responsibility Act cracks down on tax avoidance and ensures that millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share

A conservative estimate projects Murray’s bill would generate $675 billion over ten years

Senator Murray: “The revenue from this bill alone could extend the ACA tax credits AND provide high quality child care for every working family in America.”

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, introduced the Fair Trusts for Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2026 to close tax loopholes used by the wealthiest Americans to avoid paying taxes through complicated trust arrangements. The legislation is co-led by Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee.

“Firefighters and nurses don’t get to hide their money in a trust fund and skip out on paying their taxes—billionaires shouldn’t get to either,” said Senator Murray. “The very wealthiest Americans hide their fortunes in a trust for generations and call it tax planning—that is absurd and those are dollars that should be going to our schools, infrastructure, and health care. In America, if you earn a paycheck, you are paying taxes—it’s time to close the loophole that lets individuals with armies of lawyers stash away billions without paying taxes. This Republican Congress has bent over backwards to rig the system for billionaires. I am simply proposing that the ultra-wealthy—people with more than $50 million sitting in a trust—finally pay what they owe and contribute their fair share back to the country that made their success possible. I’ll bet that most Americans would prefer we fund child care and pre-k for every working family in this country rather than let billionaires get a free ride on their taxes. The revenue from this bill alone could extend the ACA tax credits AND provide high quality child care for every working family in America. If you don’t have more than $50 million laying around in a trust, you don’t have to worry about this bill resulting in anything other than better funded roads and public schools.”

“We cannot allow there to be ultra-wealthy dynasties in this country hoarding all the money and power for generations on end, and we cannot have a tax system that encourages it,” said Senator Wyden. “Our budgets suffer and economic opportunity bleeds away when the ultra-wealthy dodge taxes in America, so this bill is a smart way of ensuring the highest earners are paying a fair share just like nearly everybody else.”

Most Americans will not receive an inheritance, and for those that do, only those with assets exceeding $30 million—for a married couple—are required to contribute a portion through taxes, and even then, only on amounts over that substantial exemption. Fewer than 0.1% of Americans pay estate tax at all. These funds provide revenue that can be used for essential investments in our country, like schools or critical infrastructure. Yet many of the very wealthiest Americans use special trusts to delay, minimize, and avoid paying taxes. Experts estimate that hundreds of billions of dollars and potentially trillions of dollars are held in generation-skipping transfer tax exempt trusts that are not subject to the rule against perpetuities.

The Fair Trusts for Fiscal Responsibility Act addresses tax avoidance head on by applying a 1 percent rate on trust assets between $50 million and $100 million, 1.5 percent between $100 million and $250 million, 2 percent between $250 million and $1 billion, and 3 percent on assets above $1 billion. To ensure fairness, the bill provides full refundability of the withholding against estate tax liability so that only those actively avoiding transfer taxes face increased burdens, while also capping total withholding so it does not exceed estate tax owed. The legislation further strengthens compliance through new reporting requirements and penalties for noncompliance, while exempting charitable trusts, ERISA-qualified employee benefit trusts, and other trusts not typically used in estate planning.

A conservative estimate of a similar proposal indicates that Murray’s legislation would raise approximately $675 billion over ten years, noting, “even based on our low-end estimate of $4.5 trillion in GST-exempt trusts today, if those trusts face an average annual tax of 1.5% under the withholding tax, that is approximately $675 billion over ten years.” This could fund free school lunch for every kid in America, child care for every working family, and the replacement of every lead pipe in America; alternatively, the revenue could fund the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for decades, or extend the enhanced premium ACA tax credits nearly twice over.

In addition to Senators Murray and Wyden, the bill is also co-sponsored by Senators Van Hollen, Booker, and Alsobrooks.

The legislation is endorsed by Americans for Tax Fairness, Patriotic Millionaires, Public Citizen, Groundwork, Economic Security Project Action, NETWORK Lobby, National Women’s Law Center, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Service Employees International Union (SEIU), American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and United for a Fair Economy.

“A tax system that favors the rich makes America a poorer country for everyone, including the rich themselves. Working Americans can’t wait until later to pay taxes,” said Bob Lord,Senior Vice President for Tax Policy, Patriotic Millionaires. “Taxes are withheld from every one of their paychecks. So when ultra-rich Americans use trusts to delay paying estate tax for 50 years on billion-dollar fortunes left for their grandchildren, average Americans feel cheated. Sen. Murray’s Fair Trusts for Fiscal Responsibility Act would end this outrageous preferential treatment and restore a feeling of fairness to our tax system. Ultra-rich families wouldn’t make more tax payments. They’d just make more timely tax payments, like the rest of America does.”

“ATF applauds Senator Murray for introducing the Fair Trusts for Fiscal Responsibility Act,” said David Kass, Executive Director of Americans for Tax Fairness. “For decades, the wealthy have been able to hoard massive amounts of wealth and pass it down to future generations through key loopholes. The existing estate-tax exemption is so high ($30M for married couples) that only the wealthiest 0.1% of estates owe any tax. Yet wealthy families can further reduce what they pay through strategies like GRATs and dynasty trusts, leading to losses in revenue for public investments in education, healthcare, and more. This legislation would make key reforms to curb these abuses and rein in dynastic wealth in our country.”

Senator Murray is fighting for tax fairness and closing loopholes on Wall Street. Last month, at a Senate Budget Committee hearing on Social Security, Senator Murray slammed the Trump administration for gutting the Social Security Administration (SSA) and questioned witnesses on the fact that the very wealthiest Americans have the smallest effective payroll tax rate. Murray made clear that when it comes to addressing SSA solvency, there is no reason for working people to face drastic benefit cuts when the very wealthiest could simply pay their fair share.

In 2025, Senator Murray helped introduce the Carried Interest Fairness Act to eliminate a tax loophole that benefits wealthy money managers on Wall Street. The current carried interest loophole allows investment managers to often pay almost half the tax rate compared to most other Washington workers. Over the course of her career, Murray has long championed a fair tax system—rejecting Republican efforts to cut benefits for working people and repeatedly pushing for reforms to ensure the very wealthiest Americans simply pay their fair share. Murray has always recognized that the national debt and deficits pose real challenges; however, it has been her longstanding belief that America can reduce budget deficits while still investing in national priorities that support economic growth.

The full text of the legislation is HERE.

A one pager is HERE.

###







The following sites -- plus Ruth's "Chump would love for everyone to live in a state of fear" --  updated: