Universal’s Wicked has overtaken the studio’s own Mamma Mia! to become the biggest stage musical adaptation of all time worldwide. The global cume through Sunday is an estimated $634.4M, of which $424.2M is from domestic and $210.2M from the international box office.
Overseas, the current weekend brought in another $13.7M from 81 markets. The Jon M Chu-directed Wicked is also the top stage musical adaptation ever in 46 of those. It had earlier become the biggest Broadway adaptation of all time domestically.
The current offshore performance is ahead of Mamma Mia 2, Maleficent, The Little Mermaid and The Greatest Showman (excluding China) at the same point in release.
That's great. WICKED is a great film. It's also now on streaming, My youngest child (my child with Mike), she loves WICKED. She saw it like four times at the theater (maybe more) and we purchased the streaming yesterday via AMAZON and she's probably watched it three times already. So four times at the theaters and three times at home. I loved the movie too. It's a great film.
Okay, this:
2024 end of the year pieces: Rebecca's "sexiest men of 2024," Ann's "2024 in film (Ann and Stan)" and Stan's "2024 in film (Ann & Stan)," Mike's "Idiot of the Year," Ruth's "Ruth's Media Report 2024." "2024 in books (Martha & Shirley)," Kat's "Kat's Korner: 2024 in music" and our "2024: The Year of Betrayal From Inside The Left."
C.I. does that each year -- the paragraph noting all the year end pieces that go up in the community. So I thought I'd get online to note that. Rebecca made some interesting choices. Ann and Stan picked WICKED as the best film of the year (I agree with them). Ruth noted the very sad reality that the year's over and so many hopes are as well. Kat picked the ten best albums for 2024 and I was especially thrilled by her pick for the second best album -- one I've been listening to for months now. Martha and Shirley's book poll of the community is always my favorite read to see what books made the list. Of course, C.I. did the year-in-review that she's now done for 20 years in a row.
I'm at her place. She always throws a big party for New Year's Eve and tries to sneak away and work on her year-in-review. That rarely happens so it's often midnight before she gets the time to start. This year, it's over 11,000 words. It's incredible and she's making a ton of strong points about those who betrayed us -- and let's be clear, she's exactly right.
She's also especially right when it comes to Rashida Tlaib's refusal to support and campaign for Kamala. Both are supposed to be Democrats so Rashida doesn't get to reject Kamala. But she did and, as C.I. notes -- something no one else has pointed out -- Rashida voted twice to impeach Donald Trump. Twice. Twice, she said he was guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors but she worked to re-elect him, she refused to support and campaign for his Democratic Party opponent.
How do you reconcile that?
You don't.
Amy Goodman and the other whores tried to create a special class of boo-hoo titty babies who didn't have to vote in America's best interests because wah-wah-wah they had relatives dying in Palestine. The whores may have told that lie but it was still a lie. If you're in the United States, you vote what your country needs. People like the horrid Rashida Tlaib should have been held accountable for their actions and if you're a member of the US Congress and you vote to impeach someone even once -- forget twice -- you don't turn around and refuse to do everything you can to stop them from getting back in the White House.
Rashida should be run out of Congress. With her big mouth, she'll create multiple problems for herself over the next four years. Watch as those who used to try to support her now take the attitude of FAFO.
"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Tuesday, December 31, 2024. Look what left outlet is trying to say Kamala and Joe were as bad on immigration as Trump's about to be (and here's the kicker, they're doing that crap while begging you to give them money), MAGA's war with Chump continues, and so much more.
Donald Trump’s siding with Elon Musk over visas for high-tech workers is the most significant example yet of the president-elect favoring powerful elements in his new MAGA coalition over his base’s anti-immigrant DNA that he twice tapped in his rise to power.
The boiling holiday feud over H-1B visas exposed new fissures across Trump’s broadened support base and reflected the contradictions between his populist ideology and the self-interests of many of the key players in his refashioned inner circle.
After several days of silence over the controversy, the president-elect stepped in, making clear he supported Musk’s argument for recruitment flexibility for the tech industry.
Musk, the richest man in the world, made his case in a series of outspoken posts on X. “The reason I’m in America along with so many critical people who built SpaceX, Tesla and hundreds of other companies that made America strong is because of H1B,” he wrote to one critic on the platform that he owns. “I will go to war on this issue the likes of which you cannot possibly comprehend.”
The visa issue erupted into a full-blown storm following comments by Vivek Ramaswamy, Musk’s co-chair of the Department of Government Efficiency, which Trump has set up to slash the size of federal operations. The former GOP presidential candidate criticized American culture, education standards and children’s TV that he said “venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long.” The comments came perilously close to an elitist’s disdain for millions of Americans and their culture that Republicans have long accused Democrats of promoting.
The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, issued a terse statement Monday calling out Trump and his repeated signals that he is willing to grant clemency to those who breached the Capitol as Congress worked to certify Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.
“Some things are fights worth having,” CREW wrote in a social media post on X. “Not allowing Donald Trump to pardon January 6th insurrectionists is one of those things. Two-thirds of the country is with us on this.”
Law enforcement officials in Lincoln county, Oregon, have condemned an anonymous letter encouraging residents to track down and report “brown people” in the Pacific coast community, particularly those believed to be undocumented.
The letter, titled brown round-up part 1, told recipients to write down the license plate numbers of cars driven by people of color in order to identify people who might not have permanent legal status, the New York Times reported. It instructed readers to send that information to the Department of Homeland Security after Donald Trump’s inauguration.
“This type of behavior is harmful, divisive, and inconsistent with the values we uphold as public servants and community members,” Curtis Landers said in a statement about the letter. “Targeting individuals in this manner erodes trust and undermines the sense of safety and inclusion that we strive to maintain in Lincoln County.”
[. . .]
The letter comes as Trump has vowed an unprecedented crackdown on illegal immigration, including “the largest deportation operation in American history”.
Trump’s “border czar”, Tom Homan, said last week he projects needing at least 100,000 beds in immigration detention centers.
“I’m telling you, at the minimum we need 100,000 beds because we’ve got a big population to look for ... 700,000 criminals alone,” Homan told CNN. Homan said the deportation plans will require help from around the government, including the Department of Defense.
“The landing teams have just started working with the agencies and departments. We’ll be gathering information, a lot of information in the next couple weeks, which will help me in my planning process,” Homan said.
Adding to alarm over U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's immigration plans, his "border czar" toldThe Washington Post in an interview published Thursday that the administration plans to return to detaining migrant families with children.
Tom Homan, who served as acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement during Trump's first term, said that ICE "will look to hold parents with children in 'soft-sided' tent structures similar to those used by U.S. border officials to handle immigration surges," the Post summarized. "The government will not hesitate to deport parents who are in the country illegally, even if they have young U.S.-born children, he added, leaving it to those families to decide whether to exit together or be split up."
Since Trump beat Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris last month, migrant rights advocates have reiterated concerns about the Republican's first-term policies—such as forced separation of families—and his 2024 campaign pledges, from mass deportations to attempting to end birthright citizenship, despite the guarantees of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Homan—who oversaw the so-called "zero tolerance" policy that separated thousands of migrant kids from their parents—said: "Here's the issue... You knew you were in the country illegally and chose to have a child. So you put your family in that position."
Homan, who previously directed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during the first Trump administration, has also led a conservative nonprofit group, Border911, alongside an executive for a major federal contractor.
Homan is notorious for orchestrating the first Trump administration's family separation policy, when migrant children and parents were torn apart at the border. According to a Department of Homeland Security report, as of April 2024, there were still about 1,400 children who were not confirmed to have been reunited with their families.
Last week, Homan made headlines for once again publicly pitching the idea of family separation - this time, with a twist. Homan said he would present families with children born in the U.S. with an impossible choice: separate, or leave America together.
"For the most part, immigrants are complements, not substitutes, for native-born workers."
"So original MAGA is wrong to claim that immigration is impoverishing 'real Americans' in general. But tech-bro MAGA is wrong as well as offensive in saying that we need foreign workers because Americans are stupid or lazy. Furthermore, the availability of less expensive foreign tech workers does reduce the incentive of tech firms to train a home-grown work force and undermines the political incentive to improve our education system.
I'd still argue that something like H-1B makes America richer and stronger, especially given the spillovers generated by a successful technology sector. But Muskaswamy and friends aren't helping their case by insulting Americans' culture and intelligence."
2. Robert Reich, a former US labor secretary and member of President Bill Clinton's National Economic Council, in a Substack post
"Allowing many more skilled workers into the United States reduces any incentives on American business to invest in the American workforce.
Allowing many more skilled workers into the US also reduces the bargaining power of skilled workers already in America — and thereby reduces any incentive operating on other Americans to gain the skills for such jobs.
And opening America to skilled workers also reduces the incentive on foreign nations to educate and nurture their own skilled workforces. Why should they, when their own skilled workers can easily migrate to America?
The major beneficiaries in the US of opening the nation to skilled workers from abroad are CEOs and venture capitalists like Musk and [David Sacks], whose profits and wealth would be even higher if they could siphon off cheaper skilled workers from abroad."