Like Maria Said Paz: That awful Gina Haspel

Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "The Mother of all G-Men"

So Gina Haspel faces the Senate tomorrow. I still can’t believe she’s even being considered. The torture queen should be in prison, not heading a government agency. Good for Senator Rand Paul who has stated that he will not be voting for her. Good for Senator Martin Heinrich for saying he will not be voting for her either. On opposition to her, I also found this at THE FORWARD:

Nearly 250 Jewish clergy have signed a petition opposing President Trump’s nominee to lead the CIA, citing her role in the George W. Bush-era torture of prisoners.

“Given (Gina) Haspel’s role in the CIA’s now-defunct torture program, a vote to confirm her is incompatible with any kind of meaningful commitment to the prohibition on torture and so-called ‘enhanced interrogation,’” said the petition to be sent to the Senate, which had garnered 245 signatures by Monday evening, two days before Haspel’s confirmation hearings. “Her oversight of a CIA black site is an extreme moral offense that overrides any other qualifications she might have to serve as the head of the CIA.”

There is nothing ethical about torture. Gina Haspel has demonstrated she is unethical. She should not be allowed to lead any government agency.

Repeating, there is nothing ethical about torture or about Haspel. From THE HILL:

Published accounts by former officials or others involved in the secret detention program indicate that Haspel was not only directly involved in running Detention Site Green for a period, but in shutting it down and “sanitizing” in December 2002 in an effort to cover up the torture and disappearances that took place there and to allow the CIA to continue them elsewhere – including the treatment of ‘Abd al-Nashiri and Abu Zubaydah, whose transfer to the next “black site” Haspel would have been fully aware of if she was indeed Chief of Base at Detention Site Green.

Haspel also appears to be the individual to whom former CIA chief legal counsel John Rizzo was referring when he wrote in his memoirs that in late 2004, “José [Rodriguez] installed as his chief of staff an officer from the Counterterrorist Center who had previously run the interrogation program” [emphasis added]. By late 2004, more than 100 individuals had been held in the CIA program.

Rodriguez was himself a key player in the development and operation of the secret detention program, and an individual whose investigation Amnesty International has previously called for. A newly declassified memo outlining a disciplinary review conducted in 2011 affirms that, as Rodriguez’s Chief of Staff, Haspel was involved in the destruction in 2005 of videotapes of the detention and interrogation of Abu Zubaydah and ‘Abd al-Nashiri at Detention Site Green in 2002.

She was only following Rodriguez’s orders, according to this internal review, which found “no fault” in her conduct in relation to the destruction of the tapes. But concealing evidence of a crime may constitute criminal complicity. Complicity in torture is expressly recognized as a crime under international law. A proper investigation, applying international standards, is called for.

Her role in the destruction of evidence also means she should not be put in charge of any agency. She has no ethics.

"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

Tuesday, May 8, 2018. Only four days until Iraq hold elections.

Mohammed Ebraheem (IRAQI NEWS) reports, "Iraqi security authorities denied on Tuesday media reports about an attack against a parliamentary candidate and three policemen in Diyala governorate." Regardless of their veracity, whispers and shouts dominate Iraq as the country gears up for yet another round of national elections.

Government of Iraq‏Verified account @IraqiGovt 3 hours ago

.@ihec_offcial successfully run simulation exercises ahead of the parliamentary elections on 12 May. The tests covered the counting of votes, secrecy of the ballot and the security of the voting process #IraqVotes

1 reply3 retweets5 likes

May 12th, elections are supposed to take place in Iraq. Ali Jawad (ANADOLU AGENCY) notes, "A total of 24 million Iraqis are eligible to cast their ballots to elect members of parliament, who will in turn elect the Iraqi president and prime minister." RUDAW adds, "Around 7,000 candidates have registered to stand in the May 12 poll, with 329 parliamentary seats up for grabs." AFP explains that the nearly 7,000 candidates includes 2014 women. THE SIASAT DAILY adds, of the nearly 7,000 candidates, "According to the electoral commission, only 20 percent of the candidates are newcomers." Ali Abdul-Hassan and Sinan Salaheddin (AP) report, "Iraqi women account for 57 percent of Iraq’s population of over 37 million, according to the U.N. Development Program, and despite government efforts to address gender inequality, the situation for Iraqi women has declined steadily since 2003. According to the UNDP, one in every 10 Iraqi households is headed by a widow. In recent years, Iraqi women suffered further economic, social and political marginalization due to decades of wars, conflict, violence and sanctions." RUDAW also notes that 60 Christian candidates are competing for the five allotted minority seats. How do they elect the prime minister? This comes after the general election and is based on who won seats in the election. Abdulrahman al-Rashed (AL ARABIYA) explains, "To win the premiership, a candidate needs to win the majority of the votes, i.e. the votes of 165 MPs out of 329. Since it is a multi-party system, it is almost impossible to win these votes without sealing political alliances. The governorate of Baghdad is the most important one because it is the largest with 69 seats." The chief issues? Mustapha Karkouti (GULF NEWS) identifies them as follows, "Like in previous elections, the main concerns of ordinary Iraqis continue to be the lack of security and the rampant corruption." Sunday, RUDAW explained that the electoral commission "so far fined 210 candidates for violations of commission guidelines."

As noted in the April 3rd snapshot, pollster Dr. Munqith Dagher has utilized data on likely voters and predicts that Hayder al-Abadi's Al-Nasr will win 72 seats in the Parliament, al-Fath (the militias) will get 37 seats, Sa'eroon (Moqtada al-Sadr's new grouping) will get 27 seats, Nouri al-Maliki's State of Law will get 19 seats, al-Salam will get 18 seats (KDP and PUK parties for the Kurds), Ayad Allawi's Wataniya will get 15 seats. There are others but Dagher did not predict double digits for any of the other seats. The number are similar for the group of those who are extremely likely to vote (Hayder's seats would jump from 72 to 79 seats). Other predictions? The Middle East Insstitute's Fanar Haddad insists to Sammy Ketz (AFP) that the post of prime minister will come down to one of three people: Hayder al-Abadi (current prime minister), Nouri al-Maliki (two time prime minister and forever thug) or Hadi al-Ameria "a leader of Hashed al-Shaabi, a paramilitary network that played a pivotal role in defeating IS. Ameri comes from Diyala province and is a statistics graduate from Baghdad University. He fled to Iran in 1980 after Saddam executed top Shiite cleric Ayatollah Mohammed Baqr al-Sadr. The 64-year old is widely viewed as Tehran's favoured candidate."

Some see Hadi al-Ameria as too divisive to be prime minister yet he possess the key trait required for a prime minister in Iraq. Andrew England (FINANCIAL TIMES OF LONDON) explains:

Mr Ameri’s links to Iran date to 1981 when he left Iraq to fight Saddam Hussein’s regime in the Iran-Iraq war and helped found the Iran-backed Badr Brigade militia. Badr is the dominant force in the Hashd, which is estimated to have up to 120,000 fighters. He returned to Iraq after the US-led invasion toppled Saddam and paved the way for Iraq’s Shia majority to dominate politics. He became a MP and continued to head Badr at a time when militias proliferated in the post-invasion chaos.

No one who grew up in Iraq is good enough to become prime minister, obviously. Every person selected has been a coward who fled the country, lived outside of it for years, and only returned after the US-led invasion. Hadi al-Ameria is just as big a coward as so many others. He too can represent Iraq today . . . now that others took out Saddam Hussein.

Why do so many do like Nouri al-Maliki and nurse grudges? Because they are so pathetic -- these grown men -- that they were unable to fight Saddam and had to depend upon fighters from other countries to topple Hussein. This is an embarrassment and there's no way they can deny reality, so they nurse a grudge and try to punish others the way they wish they had been able to punish. Impotency, one of the greatest indicators of conflict.

Though 'qualified' by current standards, not everyone's buying a ticket on The Hadi al-Ameria Express. Ali Mamouri (AL-MONITOR) notes:

With Iraq's parliamentary elections around the corner, the different factions of the Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) grouped under the Fateh coalition banner face great challenges. These obstacles might eventually lead to internal divisions, decreasing the coalition’s chances of victory in the elections, to say the least.

On one level, Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the most influential religious and social leader in Shiite circles, opposes PMU participation in the elections, saying the organization’s name is being exploited for electoral gains.
Sistani’s office said in a May 4 statement, “No one is allowed to exploit the religious reference’s title or any other title dear to the hearts of Iraqis for electoral gains,” in reference to the PMU’s victories against the Islamic State (IS).
This is not the first time that Sistani has clearly opposed the PMU’s participation in elections. In his Friday sermon on April 27, Sistani spokesman Abdel Mehdi Karbalai affirmed Sistani’s position and his rejection of candidates who invoke victories against IS in the elections. The PMU was formed following Sistani's 2014 fatwa calling on Iraqis to join the security forces to stop IS after the terrorist organization occupied Mosul and moved toward Baghdad.

Turning to another issue . . .

Ruwayda Mustafah‏Verified account @RuwaydaMustafah 1 hour ago

In #Iraq’s parliamentary elections, we only hear about women in the media, not from themselves. Not a single party has started a major rally led by a female politician.

1 reply1 retweet4 likes

Show this thread

Female candidates have been targeted with smears; however, that's not an excuse for not interacting with potential voters.

Other issues including the continued lack of improvement in Iraq. ALJAZEERA notes:

The increasing poverty rate is among the campaign issues.
Years of war and political instability have left communities in ruins, and the oil-dependent economy is in decline.

But many Iraqis doubt the election will lead to changes they desire.

With no improvements, many lives are left at risk. RELIEF WEB notes:

Heavy rainfall and thunderstorms have been affecting the country over the past few days causing flash floods.
Media reported, as of 8 May, that four people have been killed in Dohuk city (Dohuk Governorate, Iraq) and 50 homes have been damaged due to the overflow of Hishkaro River. They also reported, as of the same date, that the flash floods also affected nearby refugee camps.
Over the next 24 hours, more heavy rain with local thunderstorms is forecast to affect the northern areas of the country, including the areas already affected.

When you spend no money to improve public infrastructure, when poor sewage means that rains result in flooding, you are not protecting the community. The corruption in Iraq has allowed various officials to get rich while the standard of living and safety has gotten worse. The flooding should stand as a reminder of how nothing has been achieved year after year.

In other news, Poland's Ambassador to Iraq is already an improvement over any US Ambassador.

‏ @KRG_DFR

Head of @KRG_DFR Minister @FalahMustafa, welcomed New Polish Ambassador to Iraq @PLinErbil Ms. Beata Pęksa, to exchange views on the situation of Iraq, process of dialogue & negotiations bt Baghdad-Erbil & Iraq's upcoming parliamentary elections. 

2 retweets12 likes

Every time you blinked during Barack Obama's two terms as president of the United States, he was naming another man to be ambassador to Iraq. Man. Somehow he couldn't find a qualified woman. Over and over, he couldn't find a qualified woman. This despite the changes it might have made in Iraq. Women's rights were stripped away by the fundamentalist thugs the US put in charge. Nouri al-Maliki, for example, refused to appoint women to his Cabinet at one point. A female ambassador could have made a difference. But Barack always had trouble finding qualified women -- this despite MS. Magazine embarrassing itself by insisting Barack was what feminism looked like.

Lastly . . .

‏Verified account @ACLU

BREAKING: A federal appeals court has blocked the Trump administration’s bid to transfer an American held by the US military in Iraq since September to another country. 