Joe Biden officially entered the Democratic Party primary on April 25th. The former Senator and Vice President vowed to defeat Donald Trump and rescue the “soul” of the nation. His third attempt to capture the commander-in-chief position exemplifies the decrepit state of U.S. imperial rule. After the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, U.S. and Western oligarchs celebrated the “end of history.” The oligarchs assumed that unfettered imperial rule and capitalist exploitation would permanently dominate the globe. Biden is indeed a favorite among the oligarchsto continue this project, but his very essence represents quite the opposite development.
Large numbers of people in the United States desire policies that are anathema to the Biden-Clinton wing of the Democratic Party. A new “end of history” is emerging, but this time for the empire. Majorities of voters in both parties want Medicare for All . The same goes for the Green New Deal . There is little support among the population for U.S. military expansionism , which is why it’s been cleverly cloaked as “humanitarian intervention.” The 2016 electoral defeat of Hillary Clinton was a referendum on the neoliberal imperialist agenda. Her open policy proposals to expand free trade through the Trans-Pacific Partnership, war through a no-fly zone in Syria, and corporate healthcare through the rejection of Medicare for All failed to inspire enough voters to defeat Donald Trump in the electoral college.
“Biden is indeed a favorite among the oligarchs.”
Biden is Clinton 2.0. He is an arch-conservative Democrat who encapsulates the party’s transition to Reaganism under the Democratic Leadership Council. Biden came to politics as a senator in the state of Delaware. His open support of corporate oligarchy and disdain for Black America won him the hearts and minds of the ruling class. Biden opposed desegregation early in his career. While Biden pegged himself as a champion of “workers” (building trades, cops, firefighters), he was working with Wall Street bankers to roll back bankruptcy protections for students and workers. To this day, Biden remains an ardent friend of the dictators of capital. He played a crucial role in deregulating creditors and the banks throughout the 1990s, including the repeal of Glass-Steagall in 1999. Biden has always believed that five-hundred billionaires are “patriots too” , not least because he has profited mightily from their riches.
While Hillary Clinton proudly promoted the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act (1994) which sought to bring “super predator” Black men “to heel,” Biden had been writing and sponsoring the laws that built the infrastructure of mass Black incarceration since the mid-1980s . Biden not only wrote sections of the 1994 crime bill that Clinton signed into law, but he also sponsored and wrote sections of the 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act widely known for its harsh 100-1 sentencing guidelines for crack and powder cocaine. These laws formed the core of the mass Black incarceration state. Biden and his ilk are largely to blame for the fact that over thirty percent of all Black men in the U.S. will spend one-third of their working lives either in prison or “marked” as a felon.
“Biden had been writing and sponsoring the laws that built the infrastructure of mass Black incarceration since the mid-1980s.”
Biden is also a war criminal. He eagerly supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq. This war alone caused the deaths of over one million Iraqis. Many more Iraqis have been saddled with permanent physical and psychological damage as a result of the U.S.’ use of depleted uranium. Not only did Biden support the war , but he knowingly spread lies about Saddam Hussein’s alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction (the infamous WMDs).
Those who know Joe Biden's record puzzle over how anyone could be taken in by him at this late date. He is not heroic. He is not a friend. He is someone who has repeatedly attacked and, yes, betrayed We The People to serve his corporate masters.
He is not a transition to the future, he is the past, he is everything we should want to leave behind.
"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMONILLS):
Wednesday, May 8, 2019. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo meets some
officials in Iraq, the war machine grinds on, and much more.
U. S. secretary of state Mike Pompeo scrapped a visit to Germany on Tuesday to make an unannounced trip to Iraq, pressing Iraqi leaders about what he called the increased dangers to Americans there from Iran's forces and allies.
The visit was discussed this morning on NPR's MORNING EDITION with the State Dept's Brian Hook.
Steve Inskeep: The US said the other day it's sending an aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf region. It may have been a routine deployment but the National Security Advisor paired that with talk about troubling indications from Iran And then Secretary of State Pompeo, your boss, went to Baghdad the neighboring country. What's going on?
Brian Hook: We had indications of heightened Iranian readiness to conduct offensive against US forces and our interests in the Middle East. So after we received these multiple, credible threats by Iranian regime forces forces, we repositioned our military assets accordingly. We sent the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group -- and there was a bomber just to send a clear message to the Iranian regime. And that clear message is any attack on US interests and allies will be met with force. We obviously are not looking for war with Iran but we are postured and ready to defend US forces and interest in that region.
FRANCE 24 notes:
The top US diplomat's unannounced visit marked an effort to stand up Washington's ties with Baghdad as it pushes ahead with its "maximum pressure" against Tehran -- a US arch-rival, but an ally of Iraq.
Pompeo abruptly cancelled talks in Germany and made a lengthy detour from a European tour to spend four hours in Iraq, where he met both President Barham Saleh and Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi.
"We talked to them about the importance of Iraq ensuring that it's able to adequately protect Americans in their country," Pompeo told reporters after the meetings.
ALJAZEERA adds:
Pompeo said he made the trip because Iranian forces are "escalating their activity" and said the threat of attacks were "very specific".
"These were attacks that were imminent," Pompeo said.
He declined to provide additional details to back his claims, which have been met with scepticism in numerous quarters, with many fearing that President Donald Trump's administration is seeking to prompt war with Iran.
The press should be skeptic but the US corporate media really isn't. They treat this all as normal. Over at ANTIWAR.COM, Jason Ditz does the work they refuse to:
US officials were only too willing to believe this, and the mention of Iranian proxies possibly being involved immediately led to extra tension targeted at Iraq’s Shi’ite militias, which the US and Israel have both accused of being in league with Iran.
These same militias, however, are part of the Iraqi government’s own security structure. This is likely to raise concerns within Iraq, and Pompeo’s meeting with PM Adel Abdul Mahdi doesn’t seem likely to resolve the questions.
The build up should have raised questions. The claims being put forward should raise questions. The lack of skepticism helped start the Iraq War and clearly the US press hasn't learned anything.
.@NegarMortazavi: "Media organizations and journalists have also learned a lesson from the Iraq war: that not all information and intelligence from the administration can be taken at face value, and should be treated with caution."
The first step in smashing American imperialism is radical honesty with ourselves. We don't "intervene" - we invade. That's not collateral damage" - those are the corpses of parents and children. Ours is not a Department of Defense - it's a Department of War.
The Secretary of State met with Iraq's prime minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi and with the ceremonial president Barham Salih.
Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi? Iraq? Iraq? Is there any way to protect US interests in Iraq when there is a war in the Gulf?
Hosted @SecPompeo; substantive conversation about Iraq-US strategic partnership, consolidating victory against ISIS through economic regeneration, regional cooperation. Iraq’s national interest requires promoting relations with all our neighbors, not becoming zone for conflict
You know who the US Secretary of State didn't meet with while in Iraq? The US Ambassador to Iraq. Why did Pompeo avoid the ambassador? Because there is none. The last US Ambassador left Iraq at the end of January. There US Senate has still not voted on the nominee -- the nominee US President Donald Trump named last November. The Secretary of State feels that the current situation is so important that he needs to make a visit to Iraq but apparently the situation is not so important that the US Senate feels the need to vote on a nominee for an empty position that they've allowed to remain empty by dragging their feet.
Hey everybody, we are at war in 3 different countries - Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria - and inching toward conflict in 2 more - Venezuela and Iran - AND WE HAVEN'T HAD A SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR FIVE MONTHS.
Senator Murphy is correct that there is no US Secretary of Defense. He fails to note that there is no US Ambassador to Iraq. And, let's go even further, Iraq has no Minister of Defense. They were supposed to have one last October but Adel Abdul-Mahdi didn't nominate anyone and he hasn't nominated a Minister of the Interior. US forces are on the ground in Iraq -- a country in which the security posts are empty. The last time Iraq went without a Minister of Interior and a Minister of Defense, what happened? That's right, the rise of ISIS.
These forever wars are not ending. As they continue and their costs continue, it becomes harder and harder for needs at home in the US to be met.
On MSNBC: “I’m a soldier. I’ve served over 16 years in the Army National Guard. I know first-hand the cost of war, and that is why I’m running for president.” #Tulsi2020
18 years, thousands of dead, trillions of dollars. We’re right back where we started. Our leaders have failed us. It’s time our troops in Afghanistan came home.
US House Rep Tulsi Gabbard is running for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination. Every nominee proposing something -- be it Medicare For All or whatever -- better explain how we pay for those proposals while continuing these endless wars because you can't have both.
We need to take the trillions being spent on regime change wars, the new Cold War & arms race, & reinvest those dollars in the needs of our communities--quality healthcare for all, protecting the environment, improving education, rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure, & more.
Former US Senator Mike Gravel is also seeking the Democratic Party's presidential nomination.
Most Democrats running on "peaceful foreign policies" aren't trying to stop the war machine. They're trying to tweak it - more cultural centers in Jakarta to make the bombings look good. That's not enough. Foreign policy must be fundamentally redone - that is the only option.
You cannot have a social democracy at home and imperialism abroad: the current system of savage capitalism depends on a system maintained by the imperialist project. To undo one you must undo the other. A leftist domestic policy must be complemented by a leftist international one
New content at THIRD:
- Truest statement of the week
- Truest statement of the week II
- A note to our readers
- Editorial: Expanding the Iraq War even further
- TV: Dead To All Of Us (spoilers)
- Impeachment, Nancy Pelosi, backlash and so much mo...
- Unfriend FACEBOOK
- Tweet of the Week
- Video of the Week
- This edition's playlist
- Highlights
The following sites updated:
Fallujah Forgotten
9 hours ago
Chelsea
10 hours ago
47 Tweets on spygate, Russiagate et al
10 hours ago
THE CW
11 hours ago
The trash that is Rachel Maddow
14 hours ago
Rhiannon Giddens
14 hours ago
Make a point to listen to Mike Gravel
15 hours ago
the only thing creepier than joe biden? his fans
15 hours ago
