Zuckerberg is every woman's nightmare. An unnattractive smug piece of trash. You encountered him in classes, in the park, wherever. He was smug and condescending while also wanting to make it with you.
He is the man that rapes women. He is the man that beats women.
With a little CIA seed money, he started one of the worst online sites. It harvested your information while pretending to guarantee your privacy. It used you. It played you.
Just so we're all clear: Trump's new national security adviser John Bolton didn't just lie about WMD's to promote the Iraq war. He stated, in 2015, that the Iraq war — which cost thousands of lives, wasted trillions of dollars, and ultimately spawned ISIS — was "worth it."
Sit your tired ass down. Just stop. The anniversary of the Iraq War
was this week and you didn't Tweet about that, did you, whore? No, you
are one of those wack jobs with conspiracy theories about Russia. You
are so embarrassing. You're worse than the flat earthers. But that's
fine, crazy, just don't try to grand stand on Iraq.
David Brock's whores always think they can pretend to care about Iraq
and that the world won't notice they only mention Iraq when they can
trash Republicans -- and only Republicans, they never use it to trust
Democrats but, hey, what cunning whore goes out of their way to trash
one of the johns?
Bolton thinks it's "worth it." Like Mad Maddie Albright thought killing half a million Iraqi kids was "worth it"?
Clearly, Caroline O, you think it was "worth it" too because you've
can't say a damn word about an ongoing war that's still resulting in the
deaths of Iraqis and the deaths of US service members (7 last week
alone -- 59 since August of 2014). How are you any different from John
Bolton? Because I'm not seeing a bit of difference between you and
Bolton. Both of you, through your actions and deeds, normalize and
condone an illegal war. Why don't you go to David and say, "Hey, be a
good pimp and don't send me out in the rain tonight?" Then you can use
that time to contemplate how whorish someone has to be to only bring up
an ongoing war when it's too her political advantage?
Scurry off now, no one wants to contract a social disease from you. No one needs to hear from you. As Jhene Aiko sings, "Yes, your mama did, she raised a fool wow" ("Never Call Me," from her album TRIP).
Or maybe Caroline O can scurry off to John Bolton?
I can’t think of anyone more dangerous than John Bolton to be the National Security Adviser. Pompeo and Bolton are standard bearers for the interventionist neocon foreign policy establishment, addicted to regime change wars, without any thought of the deathly cost or consequence
McMaster is out. Trump’s choice of John Bolton to replace him, following his pick of Pompeo, continues the extreme warhawk neocon takeover of the White House. Bolton helped build the case of WMD lies that was used to invade Iraq. Bolton still champions that war today.
Bolton’s reemergence within the
inner circle of American imperialist decision-making exposes the role
played by the Democratic Party since the run-up to the Iraq War,
launched 15 years ago this week. At each stage in the preparation,
launching, and expansion of the war, the Democratic Party sought to
divert mass opposition to war behind its own electoral campaigns,
including that of John Kerry in 2004, the 2006 midterm elections, the
Barack Obama campaign in 2008, and those of Bernie Sanders and Hillary
Clinton during the Democratic primaries and general election of 2016.
Despite the fact that the Democratic Party controlled thepresidency
from 2009 to 2017, not a single leading figure responsible for war
crimes, including the CIA officials responsible for torture, have been
punished or even fired.
Instead, Obama escalated
imperialist war around the world. Just this week, the Democratic Party
voted for a $1.3 trillion federal budget which includes massive
increases in military spending. As a result of the imperialist character
of both parties, a detestable figure like John Bolton is able to return
to the Oval Office.
Page 357. Sec. 8116 no funds can be used in Iraq in contravention of the War Powers Act
sounds good but . . . haven’t we been back in Iraq at war against new foes without any new congressional authorization?
There hasn't been a congressional authorization. Yet the war continues,
day after day, and apparently just so it can be a political prop for
posers like Caroline O.
May 12th, Iraq is set to hold parliamentary elections and no one's been
bothered by the fact that Ramadan takes place from May 15th to June
14th. Past elections in Iraq have required many deyas -- in the case
of the 2010 parliamentary elections, many months -- to settle.
Christopher M. Blanchard (CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE) notes: Prime Minister Abadi has announced his plan to lead a coalition of mostly Shia parties and
independent Sunni figures under the framework of his Victory (Nasr) Alliance. In launching his
own coalition, Abadi is competing with Vice President and former prime minister Nouri al
Maliki, who, like Abadi, is a leading member of the Dawa Party. Maliki’s State of Law alliance
has been critical of Abadi’s leadership, and some State of Law members are vocal opponents of
Iraq’s security partnership with the United States. Several former leaders of the Popular
Mobilization Force (PMF) militias organized to help fight the Islamic State are participating in
the elections as candidates under the rubric of the Fatah Alliance (see textbox below).
Other prominent Iraqi figures have organized coalitions and lists to contest the election, including
a largely Sunni list led by Vice President Osama al Nujayfi and the National Alliance jointly led
by Vice President Iyad Allawi, COR Speaker Salim al Juburi, and former deputy Prime Minister
Salih al Mutlaq. Among Shia leaders, Ammar al Hakim’s Wisdom (Hikma) movement has
formally withdrawn from the Prime Minister’s coalition, but Hakim reportedly intends to
coordinate with Abadi during government formation negotiations after the election. Shia cleric
Muqtada al Sadr is directing his followers to support the multiparty, anti-corruption oriented
Sa’irun coalition. Sadr has criticized the participation of PMF leaders in the election and is
campaigning on a populist reform and anti-corruption platform.
Barack Obama ousted Nouri al-Maliki in the fall of 2014 to make Hayder
prime minister. Former prime minister and forever thug Nouri wants to
be prime minister again despite his flunkies repeatedly insisting that is not the case. ALSUMARIA reported yesterday that Nouri has insisted Iraq is passing through a serious,
make-it-or-break-it period. Naturally, Nouri believes he's the one who
can save the country -- despite nearly destroying it in 2014.. Today, ALSUMARIA notes that he's saying Iraq needs someone who can lead the country in construction and progress. Others
who would like to become prime minister
include Shi'ite cleric and movement leader Moqtada al-Sadr who has teamed up with five other groups -- including the Iraqi Communist Party -- for this election cycle. Two others who'd like to become prime minister, Ammar al-Hakim and Ayad Allawi, have done joint photo-ops.
Ayad Allawi should have been prime minister per the 2010 elections.
But Nouri refused to step down for eight months and brought the country
to a stalemate. Barack Obama, then president, refused to back the
winner of the election and instead brokered The Erbil Agreement which,
in November of 2010, gave Nouri a second term as prime minister -- in
effect, nullifying the election results and overturning the will of the
Iraqi people.
March 7, 2010, Iraq concluded Parliamentary elections. The Guardian's editorial board noted in August 2010,
"These elections were hailed prematurely by Mr Obama as a success, but
everything that has happened since has surely doused that optimism in a
cold shower of reality."
November 10, 2010, The Erbil Agreement is signed. November 11, 2010,
the Iraqi Parliament has their first real session in over eight months
and finally declares a president, a Speaker of Parliament and Nouri as
prime minister-designate -- all the things that were supposed to happen
in April of 2010 but didn't.
If the post-election process goes even 1/4 as poorly as it did in 2010,
Ramadan will only compound that. Holding the election three days before
Ramadan was very poor planning.
#Iraqi_Elections
All want to reform, but few are sinceres.
The reformation in Iraq must be started right now via a set of Procedures are:
Cancel privileges and pensions retailed; work on rehabilitating infrastructure and balanced external relations;
The
House voted Thursday to pass a roughly $1.3 trillion spending bill to
fund the government through Sept. 30, giving the Senate just over 24
hours to pass the
bill and avert a second government shutdown this year.
The
massive spending package easily passed 256 to 167 as the House wrapped
up what may be the last major legislative achievement ahead of the
midterm elections
in November. But the
2,232-page spending bill remained mired in controversy after leaders rushed the measure to passage ahead of the Friday deadline.
The
attention now shifts to the Senate, where leaders hope to speed the
bill to a vote if they can persuade all 100 senators to sign off on the
plan. The biggest
threat to that effort comes from Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who moved to
block a similar gambit in February, leading to a brief lapse in spending
in the middle of the night.
I want to piggy back on Marcia from yesterday “Can
we get some real news? ” because she made some
really important points. This backs up what she was saying, we need
real news. Every news broadcast – or public affairs program that has
headlines at the start – should have led with
one aspect of the budget proposal. It should have explored it and
focused on it.
I do not expect, say, PBS THE NEWSHOUR
to tell me the entire details of the proposed budget – some of which
were not known too far ahead of time. But there is nothing that
prevents them, as a public service which is what they are supposed
to provide, from divvying up the budget. PBS says they’ll grab defense
and spend episodes focusing on that. CBS says they’ll grab housing.
ABC says they’ll grab agriculture. NBC says they’ll grab foreign policy
and the State Department spending. CNN can
grab science and research. Etc.
The news media in this country is a
failure. That is not by happenstance. That is planned. It is cheap to
do Rachel Maddow’s junk ‘news’ of ranting and raving then to do
investigative reporting or any real reporting.
Thursday, March 22, 2018. Cause and effect -- declare war on the world and it takes a lot more money to protect your own ass.
ALSUMARIA notes
the latest Mercer study of quality of life which surveyed 231 cities
and found Baghdad to be dead last. Since the 2003 US-led invasion,
Baghdad has been in the bottom including coming in dead last in 2017 as
well. Trillions spent on 'liberation' and that's the result?
Spending.
ALSUMARIA also notes
that US Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has declared the proposed US
budget to be the biggest spending increase for the Defense Dept in 15
years.
We are delivering the biggest increase in defense funding in 15 years. Reports of training accidents and incidents point to a readiness crisis, and this bill fulfills our pledge to rebuild the nations military.
This funding bill addresses other key priorities:
Maintains all existing pro-life policies
Provides resources to safeguard amateur athletes from abuse
Cracks down on human trafficking
Helps the IRS implement the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act
And more:
Sorry but there's nothing "pro-life" about war and, as Speaker of the
House, you should damn well be aware that the US remains at war in
Iraq. As Joshua Keating (SLATE) explained earlier this week, Iraq is one of at least seven wars the US government is currently engaged in:
Fifteen years ago today, George W. Bush announced the
beginning of the Iraq war. Two U.S. presidents, thousands of lives
lost, a withdrawal and a reengagement later, American troops are still
on the ground—and dying—in Iraq. There are no plans for withdrawal, even though the most recent foe there—ISIS—has been almost entirely defeated.
The conflict in Iraq is just one
facet of an ever-expanding and seemingly endless U.S. military campaign
across the Middle East, Central Asia, and Africa. Last week, the White
House, as required by a new provision in last year’s National Defense Authorization Act, issued a report to Congress on all the countries where ongoing U.S. military operations are taking place. According to the unclassified portion of the report, America is currently at war in seven countries:
• In Iraq, the U.S. military is
continuing to train and assist Iraqi security forces in order to prevent
the reemergence of ISIS, as happened after the withdrawal of U.S.
forces in 2011.
• In Syria, American troops are
still on the ground, ostensibly to mop up the last remnants of ISIS,
though administration officials have also mentioned several other goals,
including putting pressure on Bashar al-Assad’s government, supporting
local Kurdish allies, and countering Iranian aggression. These troops
have been in an increasingly complex and precarious position as open
warfare has broken out between Turkey and the Kurds—both officially U.S.
allies.
• In Afghanistan, where U.S. troops have been fighting since 2001, making it the longest conflict in U.S. history. Thousands of new U.S. troops were dispatched last year to support the Afghan government and security forces and fight the Taliban and ISIS. Nonetheless, the Taliban continues to increase the amount of area under its control.
• In Libya, the U.S. military conducted airstrikes against ISIS with what appear to be loosened rules of engagement.
• In Somalia, the Trump
administration has dramatically ramped up the number of drone and
special operations strikes against ISIS, al-Qaida, and al-Shabaab as
well as assisting local forces. Last May saw the first U.S. combat death since the 1993 Black Hawk Down incident.
• In Niger, around 800 troops are
working to train and assist local forces. The U.S. presence in the West
African country was little known, even to senior lawmakers, until the
firefight that killed four American troops last October. This
confrontation was apparently not an isolated incident in what was not originally intended to be a combat mission.
• In Yemen, the U.S. is carrying
out strikes against ISIS and al-Qaida targets as well as providing what
the White House report calls “limited support” to the Saudi-led
coalition fighting against Houthi forces. This last operation has proven
particularly controversial given the horrific humanitarian consequences
and unclear strategic objectives of the Saudi campaign. A bill, which
could see a vote in the Senate this week, seeks to end U.S. involvement in the conflict against the Houthis.
Meet the new El Chapo, the United States government. Terrorizing the
world, it needs to hunker down in a compound. And grasp that should
forces ever invade, the government will protect itself, not We The
People. Oh, like El Chapo, they might grab a child as they flee, but
only to prevent themselves from being shot. The arrogance and disregard
for international law, the inability to recognize the right of
self-determination when it comes to foreign lands, all of it adds up to
require that the US government spend more and more on 'security.'
Seven wars. And people wonder about school violence? What are children in America taught? That might makes right.
Strong and wrong you win--
Only because
That's the way its always been.
Men love war!
That's what history' s for.
History...
A mass--murder mystery...
His story
Strong and wrong
You lose everything
Without the heart
You need
To hear a robin sing
Where have all the songbirds gone?
Gone!
All I hear are crows in flight
Singing might is right
Might is right!
Oh the dawn of man comes slow
Thousands of years
And here we are...
Still worshiping
Our own ego
-- "Strong and Wrong," written by Joni Mitchell, first appears on SHINE.
Seven wars. The US government is engaged in (at least) seven wars.
Never-ending wars. Children raised in Iraq are suffering and have
suffered, absolutely. But don't pretend that children in the US haven't
been impacted. Many have grown up deprived because the same government
that can spend a trillion dollars -- spending away the children's
future -- can't provide for basic needs let alone the commons and shared
spaces. But also true, children in the US now grow up with no notions
of peace. It's war, war, forever war. That is normal to them because
that is all they have ever seen. The violence is normal (and Joe Biden
can't stop preaching it -- see Mike's post from last night).
Is it any surprised that the urge to resort to violence spreads into US
schools? Do we not believe in cause and effect? Do we not constantly
decry this or that personal development as a bad influence on children?
So if it's, for example, a sex scene in a movie, we're shocked and
shield the children. But when it's war, war, war carried out by the
government, the same government many children in this country pledge
allegiance to, we pretend it has no influence at all?
The Iraq War woke me up to how the media acts as an arm of the US government to sell imperial wars & reinforce world dominance. I couldn’t believe reporters repeated every lie the Bush admin told about why we needed to invade countries at random & start a global “war on terror”
I hear you, Abby. But I'm also aware that you're all over Syria and
other topics while you ignore Iraq. Glad you could check back in on the
15th anniversary but you do have a platform and you could use it from
time to time to note the Iraq War.
No one knows for certain how many Iraqis have died as a result of the
invasion 15 years ago. Some credible estimates put the number at more
than one million. You can read that sentence again. The invasion of Iraq
is often spoken of in the United States as a “blunder,” or even a
“colossal mistake.” It was a crime. Those who perpetrated it are still
at large. Some of them have even been rehabilitated thanks to the
horrors of Trumpism and a mostly amnesiac citizenry. (A year ago, I
watched Mr. Bush on “The Ellen DeGeneres Show,” dancing and talking
about his paintings.) The pundits and “experts” who sold us the war
still go on doing what they do. I never thought that Iraq could ever be
worse than it was during Saddam’s reign, but that is what America’s war
achieved and bequeathed to Iraqis.
A lot of people should have taken Tuesday off. The green rooms should
have emptied as a day of atonement. George W. Bush should have spent the
day in the stocks.
I'm not disagreeing with what Pierce's saying but, reality, Iraq is not
just an ongoing war, it's an ongoing tragedy. So maybe something more
than a once in a blue moon mention of Iraq?
ALSUMARIA also notes that 4 civilians were killed north of Erbil.
How? Turkish War Planes. Remember, the Turkish government insists
they only kill terrorists. See the bombs they drop, they have this
special ability to, in mid-flight, sniff the potential corpses and,
should they smell civilian blood, they're immediately redirected
automatically to a non-populated area. That is sarcasm. The Turkish
government has been killing Kurds for years now -- and this has been
ranchers and farmers and other civilians. It's amazing how Turkey --
like the US -- has a government that would rather attack other countries
instead of solving the problems in their own countries. AL MADA reports
that Turkish troops are on the ground in Erbil and notes that the
Baghdad-based central government is supposed to be protecting the Iraqi
borders. So Turkish troops have invaded Iraq. Northern Iraq. And done
so with the apparent permission of Iraq's prime minister Hayder
al-Abadi.
May 12th, Iraq is set to hold parliamentary elections and Hayder wants
to be prime minister again. What about what the Iraqi people want? Oh,
when has that ever mattered?
Hayder staked his future on the premature claim that he vanquished ISIS in Iraq.
Barack Obama ousted Nouri al-Maliki in the fall of 2014 to make Hayder
prime minister. Former prime minister and forever thug Nouri wants to
be prime minister again despite his flunkies repeatedly insisting that is not the case. ALSUMARIA reports
today that Nouri has insisted Iraq is passing through a serious,
make-it-or-break-it period. Naturally, Nouri believes he's the one who
can save the country -- despite nearly destroying it in 2014.. Others
who would like to become prime minister
include Shi'ite cleric and movement leader Moqtada al-Sadr who has teamed up with five other groups -- including the Iraqi Communist Party -- for this election cycle. Two others who'd like to become prime minister, Ammar al-Hakim and Ayad Allawi, have done joint photo-ops.
Ayad Allawi should have been prime minister per the 2010 elections.
But Nouri refused to step down for eight months and brought the country
to a stalemate. Barack Obama, then president, refused to back the
winner of the election and instead brokered The Erbil Agreement which,
in November of 2010, gave Nouri a second term as prime minister -- in
effect, nullifying the election results and overturning the will of the
Iraqi people.
March 7, 2010, Iraq concluded Parliamentary elections. The Guardian's editorial board noted in August 2010,
"These elections were hailed prematurely by Mr Obama as a success, but
everything that has happened since has surely doused that optimism in a
cold shower of reality."
November 10, 2010, The Erbil Agreement is signed. November 11, 2010,
the Iraqi Parliament has their first real session in over eight months
and finally declares a president, a Speaker of Parliament and Nouri as
prime minister-designate -- all the things that were supposed to happen
in April of 2010 but didn't.
Emma Sky: And that national election was a very closely contested
election. Iraqis of all persuasions and stripes went out to participate
in that election. They'd become convinced that politics was the way
forward, that they could achieve what they wanted through politics and
not violence. To people who had previously been insurgents, people
who'd not voted before turned out in large numbers to vote in that
election. And during that election, the incumbent, Nouri al-Maliki,
lost by 2 seats. And the bloc that won was a bloc called Iraqiya led by
Ayad Allawi which campaigned on "NO" to sectarianism, really trying to
move beyond this horrible sectarian fighting -- an Iraq for Iraqis and
no sectarianism. And that message had attracted most of the Sunnis, a
lot of the secular Shia and minority groups as well. Kevin Sylvester: People who felt they'd been shut out during Maliki's regime basically -- or his governance. Emma Sky: Yes, people that felt, you know, that they wanted to be
part of the country called Iraq not -- they wanted to be this, they
wanted Iraq to be the focus and not sect or ethnicity to be the focus.
And Maliki refused to accept the results. He just said, "It is not
right." He wanted a recount. He tried to use de-Ba'athification to
eliminate or disqualify some Iraqiya members and take away the votes
that they had gained. And he just sat in his seat and sat in his seat.
And it became a real sort of internal disagreement within the US system
about what to do? So my boss, Gen [Ray] Odierno, was adamant that the
US should uphold the Constitutional process, protect the political
process, allow the winning group to have first go at trying to form the
government for thirty days. And he didn't think Allawi would be able to
do it with himself as prime minister but he thought if you start the
process they could reach agreement between Allawi and Maliki or a third
candidate might appear who could become the new prime minister. So that
was his recommendation. Kevin Sylvester: Well he even calls [US Vice President Joe] Biden
-- Biden seems to suggest that that's what the administration will
support and then they do a complete switch around. What happened? Emma Sky: Well the ambassador at the time was a guy who hadn't got
experience of the region, he was new in Iraq and didn't really want to
be there. He didn't have the same feel for the country as the general
who'd been there for year after year after year. Kevin Sylvester: Chris Hill. Emma Sky: And he had, for him, you know 'Iraq needs a Shia
strongman. Maliki's our man. Maliki's our friend. Maliki will give us a
follow on security agreement to keep troops in country.' So it looks
as if Biden's listening to these two recommendations and that at the end
Biden went along with the Ambassador's recommendation. And the problem
-- well a number of problems -- but nobody wanted Maliki. People were
very fearful that he was becoming a dictator, that he was sectarian,
that he was divisive. And the elites had tried to remove him through
votes of no confidence in previous years and the US had stepped in each
time and said, "Look, this is not the time, do it through a national
election." So they had a national election, Maliki lost and they were
really convinced they'd be able to get rid of him. So when Biden made
clear that the US position was to keep Maliki as prime minister, this
caused a huge upset with Iraqiya. They began to fear that America was
plotting with Iran in secret agreement. So they moved further and
further and further away from being able to reach a compromise with
Maliki. And no matter how much pressure the Americans put on Iraqiya,
they weren't going to agree to Maliki as prime minister and provided
this opening to Iran because Iran's influence was way low at this stage
because America -- America was credited with ending the civil war
through the 'surge.' But Iran sensed an opportunity and the Iranians
pressured Moqtada al-Sadr -- and they pressured him and pressured him.
And he hated Maliki but they put so much pressure on to agree to a
second Maliki term and the price for that was all American troops out of
the country by the end of 2011. So during this period, Americans got
outplayed by Iran and Maliki moved very much over to the Iranian camp
because they'd guaranteed his second term. Kevin Sylvester: Should-should the Obama administration been paying
more attention? Should they have -- You know, you talk about Chris
Hill, the ambassador you mentioned, seemed more -- at one point, you
describe him being more interested in putting green lawn turf down on
the Embassy in order to play la crosse or something. This is a guy you
definitely paint as not having his head in Iraq. How much of what has
happened since then is at the fault of the Obama administration?
Hillary Clinton who put Chris Hill in place? How much of what happens -- has happened since -- is
at their feet? Emma Sky: Well, you know, I think they have to take some
responsibility for this because of this mistake made in 2010. And
Hillary Clinton wasn't very much involved in Iraq. She did appoint the
ambassador but she wasn't involved in Iraq because
President Obama had designated Biden to be his point-man on Iraq and
Biden really didn't have the instinct for Iraq. He very much believed in
ancient hatreds, it's in your blood, you just grow up hating each other
and you think if there was anybody who would have actually understood
Iraq it would have been Obama himself. You know, he understands
identity more than many people. He understands multiple identities and
how identities can change. He understands the potential of people to
change. So he's got quite a different world view from somebody like Joe
Biden who's always, you know, "My grandfather was Irish and hated the
British. That's how things are." So it is unfortunate that when the
American public had enough of this war, they wanted to end the war. For
me, it wasn't so much about the troops leaving, it was the politics --
the poisonous politics. And keeping Maliki in power when his poisonous
politics were already evident was, for me, the huge mistake the Obama
administration made. Because what Maliki did in his second term was to
go after his rivals. He was determined he was never going to lose an
election again. So he accused leading Sunni politicians of terrorism
and pushed them out of the political process. He reneged on his
promises that he'd made to the tribal leaders who had fought against al
Qaeda in Iraq during the surge. [She's referring to Sahwa, also known as
Sons of Iraq and Daughters of Iraq and as Awakenings.] He didn't pay
them. He subverted the judiciary. And just ended up causing these mass
Sunni protests that created the environment that the Islamic State
could rear its ugly head and say, "Hey!" And sadly -- and tragically,
many Sunnis thought, "Maybe the Islamic State is better than Maliki."
And you've got to be pretty bad for people to think the Islamic State's
better.
What we know about the #omnibus bill:
~$2B for Trump’s dumb wall
More money for ICE to deport hardworking immigrants
No Dream Act
No healthcare deal
No Dream Act + More for ICE Deportations? That's NOT a deal DC Dems should support.
Watching my good friend @ToniAtkins being sworn-in as California’s next pro Tem fills me with hope, and I can't help but reflect on the incredible work we have done together. Senate President pro Tempore Atkins will lead California with passion, integrity, and conviction.
For too long our most disadvantaged communities have borne the brunt of the most devastating effects of climate change and pollution. I look forward to working with @CEJAAction so that all Californians have a representative in D.C. who will fight for their environmental rights.
Kevin de Leόn added,
CEJA Action@cejaaction
Vote for @kdeleon for U.S. Senate to ensure we have strong leadership for environmental justice at the federal level who will champion equity and protect immigrant communities! Check out 2018 #EnvironmentalJustice…
We shall see.
Will California voters get what we deserve? We might. In June, we will
have primary and the top two vote getters in the US Senate race will
advance to the November general election -- top two regardless of
party.
I am supporting Kevin de Leon, the needed change we need after way too
many years of Senator I Voted For The Iraq War and Love Covering For The
CIA Dianne Feinstein.
The following community sites -- plus PACIFICA EVENING NEWS and BLACK AGENDA REPORT -- updated:
Maintains all existing pro-life policies
~$2B for Trump’s dumb wall
for ICE Deportations? That's NOT a deal DC Dems should support.
